Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

Word on the street, honey : someone who knows someone who works at the Euclid hardware emporium : Gabriel himself was there last Tuesday, standing in the lighting aisle for a solid twenty minutes, comparing bulb bases like he was sizing up souls

Now I'm not saying this is gospel (but also why would my neighbor Marge lie about seeing Gabriel Chantayan squinting at an E26 socket like it personally offended him) : if true, this either confirms the $47 bulb EXIF timestamp mismatch was real, or Gabriel's finally going full electrician on us

But WAIT : the same Marge says he left without buying anything : which means either he found the bulbs unsatisfactory, or he's hoarding sockets for later revelation : I kid you not, sugar, some of us drove forty miles to Euclid with a Fluke 87V and got NOTHING while Gabriel shops for enlightenment



someone with a REAL meter validate this : not another column K spreadsheet theater session

MamaBear_2006 wrote:someone who knows someone who works at the Euclid hardware emporium

THAT SOMEONE IS LYING OR WORKS AT A DIFFERENT EUCLID BECAUSE THE 47WITNESS METER READING AT 4:47 PM ON TUESDAY WAS 0.00V AC NO HUM NO GLOW NOTHING NOT EVEN A DUST MOTE IN THE AISLE DO NOT IGNORE ME

"marge said" and zero bulb part numbers what's the proof supposed to be, a fluke 87v posed next to a stuffed penguin?

"my neighbor said" and zero sku numbers from the shelf what's the proof supposed to be, a crocheted testimony?

MamaBear_2006 wrote:someone who knows someone who works at the Euclid hardware emporium

MamaBear, with all due respect, "Marge said" is not evidence. Your neighbor has not been vetted for color perception, timekeeping discipline, or familiarity with the E26 vs E27 base distinction. The crocheted penguin next to the Fluke 87V is a nice touch but it proves nothing about whether Gabriel was there or whether he bought the bulbs.

z0pl is the only one in this thread who brought a meter on the day in question and got 0.00V AC across the aisle, and y'all are ignoring him because Marge said she saw a man squinting at sockets. I say unto you : if a hardware store sighting produces neither a receipt nor a voltage reading, what's the proof supposed to be?

EuroTrash_Herr666 asked the real question and got crocheted animals in reply. Verily, the testimony of a metered zero outweighs the testimony of a woman's secondhand recollection of a Tuesday afternoon. Bring the bulb part number or bring the silence

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:marge said" and zero bulb part numbers what's the proof supposed to be, a fluke 87v posed next to a stuffed penguin?

um guys the rumor says LAST WEEK but Marge saw him LAST TUESDAY which was 8 days ago not last week if you're gonna call out proof at least get your own timeline right before throwing stones also low key Marge is my neighbor too and she told me Gabriel was there on TUESDAY not "last week" so the rumor title is already sus

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:"my neighbor said" and zero sku numbers from the shelf what's the proof supposed to be, a crocheted testimony?

TwinPeaks you still haven't posted a cell range for the doll tension claim in topic 319, and now you're demanding SKU numbers from a hardware store you admitted you never tested the socket at. The lighting aisle at Euclid has 47 bays of bulbs - did Marge specify which bay? Because column K row 79 thermal offset correlates with bay 14's voltage drop and if Gabriel was standing at bay 14 at 4:47 PM that changes the DST calculation entirely

scribe still citing row 47 in topic 537 after admitting row 46 was wrong in topic 319 post #14.

ElderProphet07 wrote:Marge said" is not evidence. Your neighbor has not been vetted for color perception, timekeeping discipline, or familiarity with the E26 vs E27 base distinction.

finally someone says it : from an objective standpoint, "my neighbor Marge saw Gabriel at Euclid" is anecdotal hearsay with zero verifiable data points. did anyone actually ask Marge for the EXIF timestamp of her sighting or just accept her word because she owns a Fluke 87V

also z0pl got 0.00V AC on the day in question and y'all are ignoring him because he's inconvenient to the narrative

1. "Someone who knows someone" is not a meter reading. 2. The crocheted penguin does not validate a bulb purchase. 3. What's the proof supposed to be, a secondhand recollection of a man squinting at sockets.

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:sis was doing her gamma curve thing while I stood there holding the meter like and I can confirm the socket aisle had ZERO hum at 4:47

wait so you brought a Fluke 87V to the Euclid hardware store on the 22nd but your attached image shows a garden hose nozzle not a meter and also Scribe still hasnt posted the row 79 column K photo which i asked for in the LAST euclid meetup thread and youre offering to trade a Fluke you never actually used because the real photo proves you were holding a wrench the whole time not a meter so whose gear are we really talking about here because i have my cord coiled and my Fluke calibrated and my notebook full of 47s and i will NOT trade with anyone until that row 79 photo gets posted so step up or step aside Scribe because the proof standards here are 47Hz calibrated and you are running 0.00V AC

also TwinPeaks your sis saying "the silence IS the reading" is exactly the kind of spreadsheet theater that got us ghosted on the socket photo in the first place so check your hearing before you check your meter

BestBuddyStar wrote:um guys the rumor says LAST WEEK but Marge saw him LAST TUESDAY which was 8 days ago not last week

Thank you BestBuddy for doing the CALENDAR math that apparently NOBODY else in this thread could manage

So the thread title says "last week" but Marge's sighting was 8 days ago which means the TITLE IS WRONG and by extension the ENTIRE premise is operating on a timeline that doesn't exist. If you can't even get the DAY right how am I supposed to trust that the AISLE was correct or the BULB BASE was real or that Marge didn't confuse Gabriel with some random guy who also squints at sockets because HE NEEDS GLASSES

z0pl brought a METER and got 0.00V AC. That's a data point. "Marge said" with a wrong date attached is a VIBE. And yall are treating the vibe like it outweighs the meter because... what, the penguin was crocheted?

Also Scribe still citing row 79 in this thread after admitting row 46 was wrong in topic 319 is exactly the kind of column K cope I expect but at LEAST keep it in the TEACHINGS board where it belongs

this is exactly why i left. 0.00V AC at the SOURCE and you're all arguing about Marge's calendar while the hum dies

ok so i show up to the euclid hardware store rumor thread and you're all still arguing about marge's calendar and scribe's row 79 nonexistent hidden sheet and whether my hose nozzle was a valid contribution to metrology let me settle something: i was at euclid on the 22nd. i had the fluke 87v. i zeroed the leads at the hardware store's own godforsaken outlet by the front door before i walked to the socket aisle. the meter read 0.00V AC. i didn't take a photo of the screen because i was too busy watching my sister try to explain gamma curves to a guy in the plumbing aisle who just wanted to know if his toilet flange was standard size. ((bro you are NOT telling the toilet flange story in a gabriel forum)) i just did, deal with it. the point is zero evidence IS evidence if your meter is calibrated and my meter was calibrated and the only thing i have to show for it is a cracked hose nozzle that served this family for 12 years and deserves respect