Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

Okay so I was going through old Usenet archives last night (yes I still have access through my work's university proxy) and I found a post from March 17, 1994 on alt.conspiracy that has been SCRUBBED from Google Groups but I got a cached version through the Wayback Machine. The poster's handle was "GChantayan_real" and the post lists EXACTLY 47 dates - and every single one of those dates lines up with a product discontinuation or government announcement from 1994 to 2003. I cross-referenced them. I made a spreadsheet. The probability of this being random is 1 in 3.7 million. They're going to say it's a hoax. They're going to say the account was compromised. But I have the screenshots. I have three different cache sources. WAKE UP. Open your eyes. Do the math. I'm uploading the screenshots now but if this thread disappears you'll know why.

wait wait wait... can you even prove the usenet post is real and not just some anon faking it with photoshop? bc that spreadsheet sounds wild but i need a screenshot or it didnt happen

im still not buying it truthseeker. you claimed 47 dates matching product discontinuations from a 1994 usenet post? i want to see the actual screenshot of the post with the headers. without that its just another story and dont give me the 'google groups scrubbed it' excuse bc if wayback caught it you can screencap it. put up or shut up

BackAgainLikeBadHair wrote:put up or shut up

you think i'd fake a spreadsheet of 47 EXACT matches?? the probability is 1 in 3.7 MILLION. do the math

the headers show it routed through mit.edu nodes before hitting alt.conspiracy. why would a fake post need a university proxy trail??

TruthSeeker_2020 you said 'March 17, 1994' but the headers you keep waving around would have to match the actual NNTP-Posting-Host format used by MIT's news server at the time which was '18.181.0.XX' and if you can't even screencap that with the original Date: line intact then your 1 in 3.7 million means exactly squat