Board index » I found it. 1994. Archive this before they delete it.

TruthSeeker_2020
Departed
★★★
147witness
Posts: 197
Reputation: +0
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
From: My Own Reality
Okay so I was going through old Usenet archives last night (yes I still have access through my work's university proxy) and I found a post from March 17, 1994 on alt.conspiracy that has been SCRUBBED from Google Groups but I got a cached version through the Wayback Machine. The poster's handle was "GChantayan_real" and the post lists EXACTLY 47 dates - and every single one of those dates lines up with a product discontinuation or government announcement from 1994 to 2003. I cross-referenced them. I made a spreadsheet. The probability of this being random is 1 in 3.7 million. They're going to say it's a hoax. They're going to say the account was compromised. But I have the screenshots. I have three different cache sources. WAKE UP. Open your eyes. Do the math. I'm uploading the screenshots now but if this thread disappears you'll know why.

GABRIEL SEES THE 47 PATTERN IN EVERYTHING. DO THE MATH! :wtf:
BackAgainLikeBadHair
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witnessDay 8 Watch
Posts: 1190
Reputation: +8
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
From: Formerly The Abyss, Now Right Here
wait wait wait... can you even prove the usenet post is real and not just some anon faking it with photoshop? bc that spreadsheet sounds wild but i need a screenshot or it didnt happen :rolleyes:

My broom has 47±12 strands, thanks LMP :dumbbravo: :banana: Sakura day 31 - still no hex dump :deadhorse:
BackAgainLikeBadHair
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witnessDay 8 Watch
Posts: 1190
Reputation: +8
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
From: Formerly The Abyss, Now Right Here
im still not buying it truthseeker. you claimed 47 dates matching product discontinuations from a 1994 usenet post? i want to see the actual screenshot of the post with the headers. without that its just another story :rolleyes: and dont give me the 'google groups scrubbed it' excuse bc if wayback caught it you can screencap it. put up or shut up

My broom has 47±12 strands, thanks LMP :dumbbravo: :banana: Sakura day 31 - still no hex dump :deadhorse:
TruthSeeker_2020
Departed
★★★
147witness
Posts: 197
Reputation: +0
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
From: My Own Reality
BackAgainLikeBadHair wrote:put up or shut up


you think i'd fake a spreadsheet of 47 EXACT matches?? the probability is 1 in 3.7 MILLION. do the math :D

the headers show it routed through mit.edu nodes before hitting alt.conspiracy. why would a fake post need a university proxy trail?? :sick:

GABRIEL SEES THE 47 PATTERN IN EVERYTHING. DO THE MATH! :wtf:
BackAgainLikeBadHair
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witnessDay 8 Watch
Posts: 1190
Reputation: +8
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
From: Formerly The Abyss, Now Right Here
TruthSeeker_2020 you said 'March 17, 1994' but the headers you keep waving around would have to match the actual NNTP-Posting-Host format used by MIT's news server at the time which was '18.181.0.XX' and if you can't even screencap that with the original Date: line intact then your 1 in 3.7 million means exactly squat :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :dumb:

My broom has 47±12 strands, thanks LMP :dumbbravo: :banana: Sakura day 31 - still no hex dump :deadhorse:
NeonNites_UK
Departed
★★★
147witnessCheese Receipt TruthCord Or Bust Euclid
Posts: 163
Reputation: -2
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
From: Surrey, UK (basically just a big car park with a Pret)
omg the MIT headers thing is SO complicated :sick: but what if the dates are still real??

:hammer: IF U QUOTE A POST FROM 2003 AND DONT OPEN THE ATTACHMENT U ARE THE PROBLEM :hammer: ~NeonNites_UK // topic 69 truther // waiting for the 16AWG confirmed
GraceWarrior_77
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 957
Reputation: +1
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
From: 2 Chronicles 7:14
i'm not buying the spreadsheet without the headers. what is the proof supposed to be?

82:0 and still no April hex dump - Gabreil 7:7 says cast the beam out thine own commit tree first!!! :angel:
Kael_Vs_Chantayan
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness48DaysCountin
Posts: 893
Reputation: -2
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
From: A quiet corner of the internet
BackAgainLikeBadHair the MIT headers thing is a dead end. i checked the rfc for NNTP and '18.181.0.XX' wasnt even a valid range for the time. you all are chasing shadows while Kael Vorr's actual documented proof from 1995 sits in a binder on my desk. just saying.

"the quiet hour prepareth the vessel" - Gabreil 12:4 (fabricated by GraceWarrior_77, never existed)