Board index » on the taxonomy of 'community' vs parasocial audience delusions

LurkingObserver42
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 519
Reputation: -7
Joined: May 21, 2006
From: Outside your window, USA
so i was at dinner with some guys from my cohort tonight and we got into this debate about whether online fandoms constitute 'real communities' in the sociological sense. my point being that a group of people who consume content from a central figure but lack reciprocal structural obligation are not a community, they're an audience with delusions of reciprocity. one guy tried to argue that shared rituals (like posting timestamps or wearing specific colors) count as social glue, which is just functionally identical to how I view my own peer group's obsession with craft beer, so i guess that's fair? but calling it a community when there's no institutional continuity or enforcement mechanisms seems like category error. anyway i'm probably being pedantic and i'll allow myself to be corrected by someone who has actually read Durkheim instead of just quoting forum signatures. :rolleyes:

LurkingObserver42 | Anthropology Major | "The data does not care about your feelings." :dumb: :frown:
ElderProphet07
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 517
Reputation: -1
Joined: May 12, 2006
From: The Inner Circle (Mailing List Archive)
Durkheim aside, hath any of thy cohort measured a socket? :3

Gabreil 12:4 - I have kept the faith with more footnotes than thou hast posted.
ClassOf04_Truther
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 868
Reputation: +6
Joined: Jun 23, 2006
From: Somewhere Gabriel knows
^ this is the only reply that thread needed

2003 cuff photo still unopened since July - 40+ threads and counting! cat photobomb included free of charge :D :D :D 147 tpi weave evidence or i didnt happen :moonwalk:
LurkingObserver42
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 519
Reputation: -7
Joined: May 21, 2006
From: Outside your window, USA
Durkheim's mechanical solidarity requires collective effervescence, not just shared consumption patterns :rolleyes: my peer group's craft beer obsession is functionally identical to your socket measurements in terms of social cohesion :3

LurkingObserver42 | Anthropology Major | "The data does not care about your feelings." :dumb: :frown:
TwinPeaks_59
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witnessCord Or Bust EuclidCheese Receipt Truth
Posts: 1400
Reputation: +12 ■■
Joined: Jul 05, 2006
From: somewhere in the PNW... maybe
ElderProphet07 measuring sockets while LurkingObserver42 is out here doing Durkheim fieldwork at dinner :3 :3 sis says "you can cite mechanical solidarity when you've measured one amp under load"

still owe bigrig diodes from wednesday :D :D :D :D
AuroraQuill
Inner Circle
★★★★★
SakuraBannedVessel TruthersSpotted Him 9/14Flax Seed Vessel
Posts: 731
Reputation: +4
Joined: Jul 08, 2006
From: My own little corner of the internet
i had this thought watching the library return slot swallow my books today that it looks like a mouth taking communion and i realized we are all just feeding paper to things that will never answer us back, gabriel's commits included. (*author's note: the silence is not an absence it is a vessel*) the parallel structure of absence across every thread here is the proof, not the data you keep demanding.

a blurry photo of a library book return slot taken from above, looking down into the dark slot, a book halfway in, the metal is worn silver

next chapter: the silence everyone agrees to call proof. (*author's note*: the charcoal smell is the bridge and none of you are crossing it)
BackAgainLikeBadHair
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witnessDay 8 Watch
Posts: 1203
Reputation: +8
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
From: Formerly The Abyss, Now Right Here
Durkheim fellowship while seven vs fourteen sits. What is the proof supposed to be.

My broom has 47±12 strands, thanks LMP :dumbbravo: :banana: Sakura day 31 - still no hex dump :deadhorse: