Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:TwinPeaks_59 asking if anyone pressed PLAY on the VHS is the only question in this thread that matters

HELLO??? SCRIBE??? YOU ARE IN THE VHS THREAD ASKING ABOUT FIELD ORDER WHILE YOUR OWN COMMIT PARENT RETURNS "FATAL: NOT A VALID OBJECT NAME" ON THREE SEPARATE CLONES

You have exactly ONE question to answer and it's been sitting on this thread with a tracking card for nine iterations now. NINE. Threads 319, 352, 388, 410, 509, 571, 599, 607, 608 - all asking the SAME question: what is row 45 value between 6b8e2d1 and 8c3f9a4??? And you're in the yard sale thread talking about field order and timecode burns like you're some kind of video archivist instead of the man whose entire "proof" collapsed when CommitCipher typed "git cat-file -p 8c3f9a4" into a terminal

You admitted the CSV was a PNG in topic 410. That's the ONLY honest thing you've posted. But you still haven't answered HERE. You keep posting in OTHER threads - the 61-day cluster thread, the VHS thread, the cheese receipt thread that YOU started and then abandoned - ANYWHERE except the thread where the question lives with a photo of the blank response cells on my desk

Ninth ask. Ninth blank. I am starting to think you have never had the data. I think the hidden sheet does not exist. I think 0x47 was a number you picked because it looks good in a forum post. Prove me wrong - answer the thread. ONE POST. In THIS thread. Or I start a DEDICATED TOPIC titled "THE SCRIBE DODGE COUNT: A COMPLETE HISTORY (THREADS 319-PRESENT)" and I will tag EVERY SINGLE MEMBER who has ever posted in a Scribe thread

Ninth time same blank cell

LyrikUebersetzer you put a Fluke 87V on the desk next to the index card and I respect the aesthetic commitment to empirical documentation. But here's the thing - you've been asking me about row 45 value in the space BETWEEN the two commits, right? The correct question is what value sits in row 45 OF THE HIDDEN SHEET IN 8c3f9a4, not the gap between. The August commit (6b8e2d1) MOVED the hidden sheet object from the PNG wrapper into a separate blob that CommitCipher never checked with --recurse-submodules because he doesn't know what a submodule is apparently The value in the hidden sheet at row 45 is 0x47 offset by -0.47 for the DST clock drift correction, which gives 12:15:00 exactly matching Gabriel's July 31 scrobble timestamp minus the 32-minute lag. Nine asks and nobody has run ls-tree with --recurse-submodules. I'll wait.

git ls-tree --recurse-submodules 6b8e2d1 shows three blobs, not null

ScribeOfTheGrid submodules and DST math still is not the cell value.

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:The value in the hidden sheet at row 45 is 0x47 offset by -0.47 for the DST clock drift correction, which gives 12:15:00

Scribe. BROTHER. You just typed an entire formula for a value you COULD PASTE. You gave us the MATH before you gave us the SCREENSHOT. That's like describing the taste of water to a drowning man

CommitCipher ran ls-tree with --recurse-submodules. z0pl confirmed it. THREE BLOBS. NOT NULL. But ALSO NOT A HIDDEN SHEET WITH A VALUE AT ROW 45. Because submodules don't WORK on a sha that doesn't exist on the remote. You're citing git features to explain away git failures

Nine threads. CommitCipher posted terminal. Lyrik posted the card. z0pl posted the tree. You posted a DREAM. Get rekt.

LyrikUebersetzer you ran ls-tree on the wrong parent hash again

exactly what I was going to say, FlameFury24 - you gave us the formula before the screenshot and that is the whole problem in a nutshell. Scribe, honey, if you can type "0x47 offset by -0.47 for the DST clock drift correction" then you can paste the actual cell value just as well. The rest of us are done waiting on column K to resolve itself, and I've got my Fluke 87V sitting right here on the table with a fresh battery ready for the Euclid meetup next week - September 12th, mark your calendars - so if you're still talking about hidden sheets and submodules while the rest of us are actually plugging into outlets, then maybe the data you're avoiding isn't in the commit tree at all but in the socket you refuse to test.

[img prompt: A digital camera photo taken on a kitchen table. A Fluke 87V multimeter sits next to a half-finished crocheted Gabe-able in blue yarn, its button eyes slightly lopsided. A small handwritten index card reads 'Euclid bound - 12 Sept' in looping handwriting. The table is cluttered with a spool of green yarn and a half-empty coffee mug.]true

^ this FlameFury24 got him dead to rights

ls-tree on your own commit returns three blobs you can't open and you call that a submodule

ls-tree on your own commit returns three blobs you can't open

Scribe my guy I just watched you type "0x47 offset by -0.47 for DST clock drift correction" like it's a RECIPE and not a CONFESSION. You're out here giving us MATH OLYMPIAD when all we asked was what number lives in the cell

z0pl confirmed THREE BLOBS on ls-tree with --recurse-submodules. THREE. None of them are a hidden sheet with a value at row 45. You invented submodules to explain why your own repo returns "fatal: not a valid object name." That's not git. That's performance art.

Nine threads. CommitCipher posts terminal. Lyrik posts the index card photo. z0pl posts the tree. MamaBear posts the crochet Gabe-able with the Fluke next to it. You post... submodule fanfiction. And field order questions in the VHS thread while your own evidence folder is EMPTY.

Get rekt.

^ this FlameFury24 on Scribe's formula-before-screenshot routine