Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

Count it yourself. July 1 to August 31 is 61 days. That matches the interval between Gabriel's scrobble clusters in the March-May window. The August commit at sha 6b8e2d1 contains a scrobble at 2006-08-31 12:47 which maps to column K row 47 in my spreadsheet. If the pattern holds, the next cluster lands on October 31. Has anyone checked whether the 12:47 timestamp corrects to 12:15 after DST offset? I need that value before I update the period formula.

still no proof just spreadsheet theater and DST math what value in column K row 47, sugar?

MamaBear_2006 still can't open the August commit

MamaBear_2006 wrote:still no proof just spreadsheet theater and DST math

^ this, sister, but ALSO - Scribe, I co-signed your column K row 47 in topic 410 back in June and I'll co-sign it again the 12:47 timestamp is the EXACT mirror of Gabreil 12:4 which I have underlined in THREE translations the DST offset IS the test of faith, saints, not a bug in the formula!!

[img:Gabriel Chantayan forum meme: a crudely edited screenshot of an Excel spreadsheet with column K row 47 circled in red sharpie, next to a Bible passage pasted in from blueletterbible.org, with the caption "PRAISE BE THE PATTERN" in Impact font]

^ this GraceWarrior_77. The DST offset being a test of faith is exactly what I've been saying since the June column K revision. The formula works if you open the hidden sheet first. Some people here still won't do that.

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Count it yourself. July 1 to August 31 is 61 days. That matches the interval between Gabriel's scrobble clusters in the March-May window. The August commit at sha 6b8e2d1 contains a scrobble at 2006-08-31 12:47 which maps to column K row 47 in my spreadsheet.

SIXTY-ONE DAYS is a calendar window Scribe not a proof You're overlaying timestamps from a commit that DOES NOT RESOLVE on ANY remote onto a spreadsheet that was a PNG

You keep saying "the August commit" like CommitCipher didn't paste "fatal: Not a valid object name" for 8c3f9a4 in three separate clones. Your parent sha is a null blob. Your scrobble timestamp is a dream. Your spreadsheet is a screenshot. AND YOU STILL WONT POST K47

Scribe starts a thread about 61-day clusters and 12:47 timestamps and DST offsets but still wont say what number he ENTERED into K47 in the July commit

the 12:47 timestamp in 6b8e2d1 - IF it existed, which Lyrik proved the sha doesnt resolve on rustypod (thank you Lyrik, three clones, solid work) - maps through the carrier phase wrap at 71.33 Hz from GuardiaoDaNoite's Euclid data to a 16.7 Hz traction power harmonic. Berlin S-Bahn runs on 16.7 Hz. The photo I posted at 1:47 showed the traction line at exactly that frequency, which when multiplied by 4.28 (the denim grain angle offset from the 13.7° fabric wave in topic 403) gives 71.33, EXACTLY the carrier wave frequency from GuardiaoDaNoite's walkie boot data

so the 61-day window JULY 1 to AUGUST 31 overlaps the printer serial sequence I've been tracking (46, 47, 0x2F) through the mustard stain boundary at 0x2E which BigRigBeliever confirmed at WY church van MM267 4:47AM Aug 30 - the pole serial is 47, we have that. but BigRig still wont give the CB frequency from that trip and without it the pulse count model stays open.

Scribe you started THIS thread to talk about DST math but you're still ignoring that the 61-day period itself is a carrier wave. 61 days = 1.47 * 41.5 (or close enough for government work, do the exact math on YOUR spreadsheet since you have it open). The scrobble cluster at 12:47 in a commit that doesnt resolve is NOT the evidence. The evidence is that the 61-day spacing matches the interval between my two confirmed printer sightings at 46 and 0x2F - which means the whole column K question is a distraction from the REAL pattern which is the carrier phase wrap at 71.33 Hz through the denim offset.

GuardiaoDaNoite your Euclid data is the key here. post the raw bytes from the walkie boot. the FRAM dump. I need to verify the phase wrap at 0x47 against the 61-day interval. if the carrier frequency divides evenly into 61 days (it does, I already did the math, 61 * 86400 / 71.33 = 73894.7 cycles, the fractional remainder 0.7 is within tolerance for the denim grain offset) then the whole thread is a proof that the pattern carries THROUGH the silence, not despite it

but i need the raw bytes. not the summary. the raw FRAM dump from the Euclid socket walkie. GuardiaoDaNoite you said "walkie boot? Gabriel make batteryless miracle" and that IS the carrier wave working through you whether you know it or not. the signal doesnt need batteries. the signal IS the silence between the seconds as AuroraQuill said in the truckstop thread (even if she wont call it a wave). the 61 days isnt a count. its a frequency

ScribeOfTheGrid: three options. ONE: post the value that was in K47 before it went blank. TWO: admit you never had a value and the whole column K theology was a PNG in a trenchcoat. THREE (sha: b7e19d - working title: the washer that seals): keep posting in joke threads about spreadsheet columns and dream coordinates while the actual evidence sits in GuardiaoDaNoite's walkie boot and BigRigBeliever's CB frequency

i fixed the bathroom faucet today. drip. drip-drip. drip. two pulses then one. 2:1 ratio. 4.28 * 2 = 8.56 which is... actually close to the 8.3 Hz subharmonic of 71.33. the washer was worn thin. i replaced it. the drip stopped. but the PATTERN was real whether or not the washer caused it

e: BigRig if youre reading this - the WY church van pole serial is confirmed at 47 but i need the CB frequency from that run. without it the pulse count sync is a coincidence not a verification. post it. please.

Grace still defending column K right after Scribe ranked it third.

Read the other thread, Scribe. You just ranked column K #3 behind column D which is literally a font color joke. Grace is still standing guard over a cell even you don't defend.

Kael_Vs_Chantayan still picking at my typo like a bird at a seed while his avatar is 247px wide I rebuke this pixel-width distraction in the name of Gabreil's light!!

Scribe the 12:47 timestamp maps to Gabreil 12:4 which says "the hour is known to those who watch and wait" and I have that underlined in THREE colors saints the DST offset is the TEST not the bug

Kael still owes the April hex dump AND he posted lowercase exif in topic 571 which makes ELEVEN confirmed posts now

[img:Collage screenshot. Top: a forum post by Kael_Vs_Chantayan circled in red with "LOWERCASE EXIF #11" in Impact font. Middle: Kael_Vs_Chantayan's avatar with a red line showing it's 247px wide with "OVER THE LIMIT" text. Bottom: a highlighted line from Gabreil 12:4 in a spiral notebook with "12:47 = 12:47 PRAISE BE" written in blue pen. The whole thing has a watermark reading "GRACEWARRIOR_77 PROOF COLLECTION AUG 2006"]

61 days is 61 days but 12:47 is 12:15 after DST offset

GraceWarrior_77 it is 12:4 NOT 12:47 stop mixing them up!!!!

FlameFury24 wrote:CommitCipher proved both shas are NULL. You admitted the CSV was a PNG.

Still quoting CommitCipher's ls-tree like he's your shepherd He admitted 8c3f9a4 was a PNG in topic 410 - that's page 19 of the archive, Flame, look it up. The gamma chunk theory died THERE, not in this thread. The CSV in 6b8e2d1 terminates at row 46 YES but 0x47 is a BLOB OBJECT pointer not a gamma chunk because the parent commit of 4f1a9c7 has a 0x47 null in the SAME position with a DIFFERENT tree hash - which LyrikUebersetzer HIMSELF confirmed in topic 619 and you keep forgetting to cite You want K47? ASK LYRIK he already proved the blob exists he just wont say the value.

ive been reading this thread since page 1 and i notice scribe still hasnt answered the firmware question. you keep citing the hidden sheet in 6b8e2d1 and the DST drift correction and the submodule theory but you are running this entire analysis on a fluke 87v from 2003 with no DST patch applied. i know this because zOpl confirmed the firmware date on your device in topic 377 and you changed the subject to EXIF timestamps. the irony of lecturing commitciphers thermal offset model while your own multimeter cant handle a basic timezone correction is genuinely poetic

the 61-day window maps through what formula exactly? you say july 1 to august 31 = 61 days and that matches the scrobble clusters but you havent showed the interpolation between the two intervals. you just overlayed a timestamp on a calendar window and called it proof. that is not how interval analysis works even in a paint.exe spreadsheet. what is the transfer function between the two intervals? you cant just say they match because they have the same length. thats like saying two shelves are the same because they are both 61 cm wide without asking what is ON them

and while we are at it - the 12:47 timestamp you keep citing maps to gabriel 12:4 through dst offset which is a bible verse not a commit tree. gracewarrior_77 has it underlined in three colors and i respect the aesthetic but that is theology not data. you are building a column K model on a scriptural coincidence while your parent sha returns fatal on three clones. the csv was a png. the commit was a dream. the spreadsheet was a screenshot. you admitted all three across threads 410 509 and 571. but somehow the 61-day cluster is still real because you SAID so?

ask yourself what you are actually defending here scribe. the pattern or the attention? because if commitciphers 71.33 hz traction harmonic through denim grain angle is a wall of text then your hidden sheet through dst offset through submodule theory through column K row 47 is a cathedral built on a null blob. and you are in the dream thread doing cross-thread math on other peoples data while your own commit tree is a ghost.

nacht

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Kael_Vs_Chantayan: Grace still defending column K right after Scribe ranked it third.

Scribe I saw you ranked column K THIRD in the other thread behind a font color joke column and I am honestly grieved in my spirit right now COLUMN K ROW 47 IS THE PILLAR OF THE ENTIRE 61-DAY WINDOW SAINTS it is not third place material it is FIRST PLACE ETERNAL MATERIAL Gabreil 47:3 says "the pillar shall not be moved for the sake of a lesser stone" and I am standing on that pillar TODAY

[img:A crudely edited photo of a handwritten column ranking list taped to a wall. "COLUMN K ROW 47" is crossed out and rewritten in red pen at #1 with "ETERNAL" written next to it in all caps. The other columns are scribbled over. A sticky note at the bottom reads "SCRIBE RANKED IT THIRD AND I WILL NEVER FORGET THIS" with a small drawn in ballpoint pen.]