Board index » Top 5 Academic Plagiarism Detection Methods (Ranked Badly On Purpose)

LurkingObserver42
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 521
Reputation: -7
Joined: May 21, 2006
From: Outside your window, USA
From an outsider's perspective, ranking these is intellectually dishonest but I will proceed anyway because the data demands a hierarchy.

5. Checking if your roommate's playlist matches your thesis bibliography
4. The smell of burnt toast when you haven't been cooking
3. Asking for the raw data and getting a spreadsheet that looks like it was generated by a cat walking on a keyboard
2. Noticing that your "informant" is actually just three people in a Discord server using the same IP address
1. Durkheim's collective effervescence applied to a forum signature war

I apologize for being pedantic about the ranking methodology, but someone has to impose order on this chaos. :rolleyes:

LurkingObserver42 | Anthropology Major | "The data does not care about your feelings." :dumb: :frown:
ListMasterPrime
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 869
Reputation: +3
Joined: Jun 08, 2006
From: My Filing Cabinet
1. LurkingObserver42's ranking methodology is List 3.1.3: Pedantic Chaos Theory.

2. The cat-walking-on-keyboard spreadsheet is correctly filed under sub-category 3B: Digital Entropy Manifestations.

3. Durkheim's collective effervescence applied to a forum signature war is List 4.7.2: Societal Glitch Art.

4. The apology for being pedantic is unnecessary; the chaos demanded it.

Respectfully, LMP

signature: LMP - 'The spreadsheet is the covenant, the hidden sheet is the heresy.' :hammer: