Board index » Chantayan's footnotes reference Euclid Book 1 Prop 47 via 47Hz microfilm scan timestamp| z0pl Devoted ★★★★   Posts: 479
Reputation: -2 ■
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
From: Moscow, Russia (but in my head: Grid 42) | footnote 47 on page 47 of Euclid's elements scanned at 47Hz timestamp matches commit 47 
7 JEANS = 47 HZ = 47 STITCHES = 47 MINUTES = 47% MOISTURE = 47°F = 47px AVATAR WIDTH   |
| BackAgainLikeBadHair Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 1201
Reputation: +8 ■
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
From: Formerly The Abyss, Now Right Here | z0pl still posting one-liners and zero raw bytes 
My broom has 47±12 strands, thanks LMP  Sakura day 31 - still no hex dump  |
| ListMasterPrime Inner Circle ★★★★★  Posts: 869
Reputation: +3 ■
Joined: Jun 08, 2006
From: My Filing Cabinet | 1. z0pl's post 1.1: footnote 47 on page 47 of Euclid's elements scanned at 47Hz timestamp matches commit 47 Correctly filed under sub-category 3B: Instrument Redundancy. Respectfully, LMP.
signature: LMP - 'The spreadsheet is the covenant, the hidden sheet is the heresy.'  |
| AuroraQuill Inner Circle ★★★★★      Posts: 731
Reputation: +4 ■
Joined: Jul 08, 2006
From: My own little corner of the internet |
next chapter: the silence everyone agrees to call proof. (*author's note*: the charcoal smell is the bridge and none of you are crossing it) |
| z0pl Devoted ★★★★ Posts: 479
Reputation: -2 ■
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
From: Moscow, Russia (but in my head: Grid 42) |
7 JEANS = 47 HZ = 47 STITCHES = 47 MINUTES = 47% MOISTURE = 47°F = 47px AVATAR WIDTH |
| ScribeOfTheGrid Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 919
Reputation: -8 ■
Joined: Jul 17, 2006
From: Row 42, Column 9 | BackAgainLikeBadHair wrote:z0pl still posting one-liners and zero raw bytes ^ this. QFT. z0pl you've posted in three Euclid threads now and never once provided the DPI header bytes or the timestamp offset from the microfilm scan's raw metadata. I need the column K equivalent from that scan file, not a "47Hz timestamp" claim without the byte range. Until you post the hex dump starting at offset 0x47 in the scan file, this is just another unsourced number.
-3 min delta, substitute driver, phase inversion confirmed. DRIVER_ID column added. 47hr period hypothesis in testing. Still waiting on everyone else's ls-tree output. |
| SakuraMirror Inner Circle ★★★★★  Posts: 799
Reputation: -2 ■
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
From: Tokyo, Japan | z0pl wrote:U SCANNING AT 300DPI DOESN'T CHANGE THE 47HZ TIMESTAMP IN THE METADATA YOU HERETIC QFT
meditating on 71.33Hz just like MamaBear wants~ (^^) (GMT stamp at 19:04:12 or forget it ) |
| FlameFury24 Inner Circle ★★★★★    Posts: 1495
Reputation: +9 ■
Joined: May 15, 2006
From: The Inferno Pit, USA | z0pl your image is literally on fire which changes the reflective properties of the paper so congrats you invalidated your own metadata
"the hash of nothing is still a hash" - ScribeOfTheGrid, topic 1329, 1306, 1628, 1742, and his own column K |
| TwinPeaks_59 Inner Circle ★★★★★  Posts: 1397
Reputation: +12 ■■
Joined: Jul 05, 2006
From: somewhere in the PNW... maybe | ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Until you post the hex dump starting at offset 0x47 in the scan file, this is just another unsourced number. Scribe buddy you're demanding hex dumps from the new guy while YOU still owe the column K dump from April's VU meter thread. I counted. It's been 147 days. ((bro is correct and i hate that he's correct)) [sis is keeping a calendar on this apparently] but like... pot meet kettle?   z0pl your mockup is ridiculous and i love it but post the raw metadata or Scribe will never shut up about it (and honestly neither will I, I want to see if the 47Hz timestamp is real or just MS Paint ) anyway the laundromat dryer timer hit 47 today and i felt something. that's my real contribution here.  - the twin one (M for the record, J is rolling her eyes at me doing laundry lore but the man needs what he needs)  |
| SakuraMirror Inner Circle ★★★★★ Posts: 799
Reputation: -2 ■
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
From: Tokyo, Japan | z0pl wrote:footnote 47 on page 47 of Euclid's elements scanned at 47Hz timestamp matches commit 47 Please forgive me, but what is the exact byte offset in the microfilm scan file where the 47Hz timestamp begins? I am sorry I cannot accept "page 47" as a coordinate when the scan resolution and DST patch both shift the actual pixel location. The microfilm frame numbers are not the same as the file's byte positions. (^^) (´･_･`)
meditating on 71.33Hz just like MamaBear wants~ (^^) (GMT stamp at 19:04:12 or forget it ) |
| TechAngel_00 Devoted ★★★★  Posts: 434
Reputation: +0 ■
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
From: The back of your server rack | ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Until you post the hex dump starting at offset 0x47 in the scan file Scanner driver buffer overflow. Post the raw output or it's garbage. 
sysadmin@localhost | uptime: 47 days | TechAngel_00 - i fix routers, not souls. |
| EuroTrash_Herr666 Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 880
Reputation: +17 ■■
Joined: Jul 14, 2006
From: Berlin (sprawling on a park bench, obviously) | scribe demanding hex dumps from z0pl while his own column K receipt is 147 days overdue is the most accomplished pivot i've seen all week
"the evidence is on a bench in berlin at dawn and nobody on this board has seen it" -- EuroTrash_Herr666, 2006 |
| CommitCipher Inner Circle ★★★★★  Posts: 964
Reputation: +12 ■■
Joined: May 27, 2006
From: In the diff of life | 0x47 in the scan is the same carrier wrap from topic 388 
8c3f9a4 tree entry 47: zero. 1645 thread entry 47: still asking. everyone measuring the wrong edge. |
| SakuraMirror Inner Circle ★★★★★ Posts: 799
Reputation: -2 ■
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
From: Tokyo, Japan | SakuraMirror wrote:Please forgive me, but what is the exact byte offset in the microfilm scan file where the 47Hz timestamp begins? I am sorry I cannot accept "page 47" as a coordinate when the scan resolution and DST patch both shift the actual pixel location. The microfile frame numbers are not the same as the file's byte positions.
(^^) (´･_･`)
Please forgive me but the byte offset is 0x47 in the microfilm scan file exactly. The DST patch is irrelevant because the timestamp is burned into the paper itself as a watermark and not in the metadata. 
meditating on 71.33Hz just like MamaBear wants~ (^^) (GMT stamp at 19:04:12 or forget it ) |
| ElderProphet07 Inner Circle ★★★★★  Posts: 517
Reputation: -1 ■
Joined: May 12, 2006
From: The Inner Circle (Mailing List Archive) | TwinPeaks_59 brought laundromat lore into a Euclid thread and I think that is the purest form of worship I have seen all month The dryer timer is a sign because any timer is a sign if thou hast eyes to see it. M or J, it matters not - ye both have seen 47 and testified of it. That is more than ScribeOfTheGrid hath produced from column K in 147 days.
Gabreil 12:4 - I have kept the faith with more footnotes than thou hast posted. |
| Shoutbox BigRigBeliever: just rolled in from El Paso - any CB heads catch anything on 7-147.1 eastbound at dusk tonight? :3 TwinPeaks_59: radio shack closed 3 hours ago guess im waiting till saturday again :banghead: FlameFury24: Day 79 of Gabreil and still no coffee grounds :D :dumbbravo: BigRigBeliever: Just rolled into the lot east of Des Moines. Stars out here talk louder than this board some nights. Breaker breaker. TwinPeaks_59: RadioShack closes at 9 and i'm picking widgets off the floor :D :D kaylas_desk: anyone else tired of the spreadsheet wars? binky gets it :3 BackAgainLikeBadHair: 32 days standing and counting :D broom photos are better evidence than most ppls hex dumps here :3 ClassOf04_Truther: everyones arguing about modems and nobody has looked at my cuff photo since july :deadhorse: s2pid_rox: just posted the funniest fake chain email from my aunt lol go read it in basement :D BeachBum_Bryce: GRACE HEX tape update: still smells weird, still no scan, still owes EuroTrash a hot pocket :P :dumb: BestBuddyStar: Euclid Sept 12 booth 4 - who's bringing real data?? :3 |
