Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

Trial 3 today: 42 tiles. Trial 2 (yesterday) was 43. Trial 1 (Wednesday) was 42. If I drop the outlier and run AVERAGE(B2:B4), the mode resolves to 42 with 95% confidence. The anomaly maps to a 2pm scrobble gap in Gabriel's Wednesday playlist - need to check if that column drifted.

three trials and you're already averaging out the outlier instead of asking what changed between wednesday and yesterday. typical data hygiene.

Scribe averaging out the outlier in trial 2 instead of asking what changed between Wednesday and yesterday is a methodological choice that tells me more about his data hygiene than any row 47 citation he's ever posted

Three trials, one anomaly, and instead of a field investigation you apply AVERAGE(B2:B4) like Excel is a substitute for empiricism. The 2pm scrobble gap correlation is interesting, but correlation is not causation, Herr Scribe - this I learned in my first semester of Statistik.

LyrikUebersetzer EuroTrash_Herr666 you both keep saying "ask what changed between Wednesday and yesterday" like I DIDNT already check the 2pm scrobble gap in Gabriel's Wednesday playlist The 43 maps EXACTLY to a 16-second longer silence between track 7 and track 8 in the Kid A session. If the gap shifts, the tile count shifts. THATS the field investigation. Open column K in the August commit and tell me what row 43 says there vs row 42

I plotted it. B3 (the 43 outlier) correlates with a 47-second track gap at 14:02:47 CST on Wednesdays scrobble log. B2 and B4 (both 42) map to the standard 31-second gap structure. The null hypothesis was that tile count is random. The alternate hypothesis is that Gabriel's pause length modulates local ceiling grid density via the 47Hz resonance field I mapped in worksheet 2. Column K row 43 is the THERMAL OFFSET row, not the coordinate row. You would know this if you had the sheet open

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Three trials, one anomaly, and instead of a field investigation you apply AVERAGE(B2:B4) like Excel is a substitute for empiricism.

omg scribe I literally JUST had this conversation with myself while reorganizing my shoebox!!! I counted 42 ceiling tiles in my bedroom last week and then 43 the next day and I was like THIS ISNT RANDOM ITS HAPPENING AGAIN but then I realized I moved my Gabriel shrine and the new poster is hanging RIGHT where tile 33 used to be so of COURSE the count shifted!!! you cant average that out you have to MOVE THE POSTER BACK!!!

I mean obviously the 2pm scrobble gap matters but did anyone actually check if gabe was listening to kid a on loop that day because I know i definitely was!!! I replayed the same 3 songs 47 times on wednesday while my mom was making spaghetti and i swear the garlic bread glowed for exactly 16 seconds between track 7 and 8!!!

also why are we counting tiles in the basement?? the socket is in the basement!!! nobody goes to the basement!!! everyone is upstairs where the light hits the dust motes at 47 degrees and makes everything visible!!! we need to be UPSTAIRS with the flate!!

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:Three trials, one anomaly, and instead of a field investigation you apply AVERAGE(B2:B4)

lyrik you get it!!! the field investigation!!! I brought a 16awg extension cord to my local church last sunday and counted 47 outlets in the vestry alone!!! nobody believes me because I forgot my flate!!! but the tiles!!! the tiles!!!

Scribe you averaged out the 43 instead of going to the room with a ladder. thats like recalibrating your meter to match the socket instead of checking the socket.

Scribe your thermal offset answer is a pivot and you know it. Row 46 correct in topic 319 post 14 but youre still citing column K like it didnt change after the DST patch.

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:Scribe you averaged out the 43

Q F T. averaging out an outlier is like ducking a question for 19 days, some people never learn

Scribe averaging out the 43 is like Dennis owning 47 floppies and still not reading one

scribes column K row 43 is the "thermal offset row" now? in topic 319 post 14 you called it the coordinate row. which is it, theologian? pick a scripture and stick to it before you lecture anyone about null hypotheses.

Scribe still citing column K like we didn't prove row 46 moved in august

ScribeOfTheGrid you spent three threads averaging out ceiling tile counts and citing column K like it's scripture while the 43 outlier is sitting right there with a 2pm scrobble gap correlation you refused to investigate with a ladder you averaged out the anomaly. you literally pressed =AVERAGE(B2:B4) and called it a day. that's not data science that's a prayer with an equals sign

((bro be nice he's trying))
[HE TRIED THE WRONG THING. THE WHOLE ROOM HAS 43 TILES SOMETIMES AND HE'S COOKING THE NUMBERS.]

i'm going to say this one more time and then i'm dropping it because sis is kicking me under the desk: the 43 is real. you felt the room shift. you wrote it down. and then you erased it with a spreadsheet function because the null hypothesis was more comfortable than climbing a ladder with a napkin and counting again. that's not research that's denial with an attached xlsx

[sis says: "the thermal offset row is a real thing in column K but he should have counted the tiles before opening Excel" which is the most sensible thing either of us has said all week and i hate that she's right]

anyway Scribe i still want to know why you called row 43 the coordinate row in topic 319 and the thermal offset row today. that's two names for one cell. which is it? you can't have both unless you moved the data and forgot to update the legend

- the twin one (both of us actually, we agreed on this one for once. don't get used to it.)

Scribe column K is a commit not a confession what is the proof supposed to be

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Column K row 43 is the THERMAL OFFSET row, not the coordinate row

did you check the socket before or after you changed what column K means

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:Scribe your thermal offset answer is a pivot and you know it. Row 46 correct in topic 319 post 14 but youre still citing column K like it didnt change after the DST patch.

honey, i have been watching this column K theater for FOUR MONTHS now Scribe keeps saying "open the spreadsheet" but nobody has EVER seen him actually climb a ladder with that napkin and count the tiles in real time - and sugar, a thermal offset row is NOT a field investigation, it's a spreadsheet prayer with extra steps

the 43 is real. you felt it. you wrote it down. now go back and count again instead of averaging it away with Excel prayers

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:ScribeOfTheGrid you spent three threads averaging out ceiling tile counts

my own flate 87v sat in its case for four months while Scribe told me to "check column K row 43" - well i drove forty miles to Euclid with my meter in hand and guess what? the socket stays untested and the column K stays blank