Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

Kael_Vs_Chantayan wrote:FlameFury24 already caught you Gabreil 47:3 in a thread about column K - 46 misspellings this month and STILL no April dump

46 Gabreils you counted and STILL no April hex dump from you, Kael Still 247px avatar breakin every rule ListMasterPrime ever typed, still lowercase exif like it's a fashion choice. I made you a deal last month - you post the dump, I stop typoing the name. You won't take it. Gabreil 12:4 says 'the accuser counts the mote in his brother's eye while his own hex dump sits in a drawer since April.' Prayin the evil eye off this deflection, brother

BigRigBeliever wrote:I got a CB in the cab right now that'd settle your debate real quick - just gotta key up. When you gonna do it TwinPeaks_59

BigRig still talking CB frequencies while Novosibirsk waits for 1:47 voice yes Still no walkie tape from you after 54 days of radio talk

CommitCipher at least posts SHA hash for real proof you BigRig only post radio excuses

Voice more important than fabric, BigRig. When you key that mike what voice come out? Still waiting

BigRigBeliever you're demanding eastbound dusk CB frequency day 55 and supposedly 'been sittin in the cab at loves reading posts' while you STILL owe a logbook photo for the page count between topic 307 and 322. I said month ago: show me the binding stitching count that proves 47 vs 46+skull and I key the mike same night. You haven't posted it because you CAN'T.

GraceWarrior_77 wrote:Gabreil 12:4

47 now You fabricated Gabreil 4:11 in the clock aisle thread, Gabreil 47:2 in that other thread, and now Gabreil 12:4. That's THREE fake verses while I'm still waiting on ONE hex dump you promised in APRIL

47 misspellings in Sep, 0 hex dumps, 3 fabricated verses. The math is RIGHT there

Where's the dump, Grace? Still 247px in your way?

Also SakuraMirror you're in this very thread up there talking about thermal paper batch codes when Lyrik's EXIF screenshot of your MARCH 2004 floppy stamp has been up for a week and you still haven't said one word about it. You CAN talk about hardware verification - you just won't on your own evidence.