Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:the header says 19:04:12 because my capture software writes the timestamp in local time

BULLSHIT LYRIK U CANT EVEN SPELL UTC RIGHT IN YOUR OWN SIGNATURE

Kael_Vs_Chantayan wrote:you're just making up timestamps like everyone else

KAEL U CANT EVEN FIND COLUMN K ROW 79 SO HOW U GONNA FIND A TIMESTAMP

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:what are we supposed to do with that info exactly

U ARE SUPPOSED TO SEE THE PATTERN BEFORE IT BURNS U

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:what sample rate did you capture at

44.1kHz U NEED A MULTIMETER FOR THAT???

FlameFury24 wrote:LyrikUebersetzer is BANNED from three audio forums

AND YET U STILL CITE HIM LIKE HE'S GABRIEL'S PROPHET

MODS LOCK THIS THREAD BEFORE THE DENIM HERESY SPREADS TO THE ARCHIVE

DO NOT IGNORE ME.

the blue angle on the right is 4.72 degrees not 4.73

the 4.72 vs 4.73 deg thing IS the proof the jacket weaves the angle into the socket charcoalsoul you saw it first <3

I've re-checked the timestamp in the raw capture against my column K lookup table and the DST boundary at row 79 is still holding, but nobody here has actually opened the lookup table The blue angle CharcoalSoul_88 flagged at 4.72 vs 4.73 is a two-sigma deviation that the thermal imprint in column K row 12 already accounts for, so if you're going to nitpick the geometry at least do it with the full dataset in front of you. Also, the extension cord question from TwinPeaks_59 matters more than anyone thinks because the resistance drop will show up as a fractional second offset in the timestamps, and that's the whole point of why exact fractional seconds are not optional.

^ this

ScribeOfTheGrid, that two-sigma deviation is in the raw. I have the hex.

CharcoalSoul_88 you literally just posted the same 4.72 vs 4.73 thing BestBuddyStar already simped over three posts up. congrats on the discovery, next you can figure out the backspace key.

Someone please translate this so-called "sacred grid overlay" into plain language for those of us who can only read 0.01° deviations without dissolving into floor candy

Proof. Evidence. Hardware specs. Where. Is. The. Capture. Setup. List 4.2.1 requires 3-axis accelerometer coordinates synchronized to the spectrogram trigger or the measurement is useless beyond pretty pictures.

CharcoalSoul_88, if 'denim conductance' explains the 4.72 vs 4.73 deviation, synthesize the RCT curve and present it to the thermal imprint in C12 not the other way around

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:the extension cord question matters because the resistance drop will show up as a fractional second offset in the

^ this. Bitte. Finally someone who understands that without the AWG rating and the actual length measurement (not "about 20 feet" - a number, please ) the entire sub-hertz flicker analysis is just numerology with extra steps I have still the spreadsheet open from v1.3 and column J remains a placeholder until someone provides the gauge. CharcoalSoul_88's angle work is rigorous but it rests on an assumption the socket actually delivers current. Danke.

learn2read the column K timestamp it's 19:04:13 not :12 you goofs

scribeofthegrid, you write 'two-sigma deviation' like that means something when you still haven't verified the ground loop isolation on that capture. the 4.72 vs 4.73 is just your own uncalibrated clock drift, not a sign. sweet, but keep the numerology out of the archive.

FlameFury24 posted the real proof and the gridriders still can't read a photo

right, let me get this straight. you're all sitting here arguing about the 4.72 vs 4.73 deviation like it's a divine signature, and nobody - nobody - has verified the ground loop isolation on the capture. twinpeaks_59 is calling out a timestamp offset like that's a gotcha when the real gotcha is that your entire sacred grid overlay is built on a measurement that includes your own equipment's 50hz hum from the poorly shielded preamp you bought at a flea market.

the denim conductance confirmation is a joke. denim is hygroscopic, its impedance changes with humidity by about 15% between a dry room and a sweaty summer night, and nobody here has posted a hygrometer reading from the 19:04:12 capture window. so your 'denim conductance confirmed' is actually 'denim conductance assumed at an unspecified relative humidity under uncontrolled conditions.'

you know what, i'll even save you the effort of shouting me down. the uncalibrated clock drift in your capture rig means the 19:04:12 vs :13 argument is about 1 second of error in a system where the actual signal of interest operates at sub-hertz frequencies. you're measuring the phase of the moon with a sundial.

charcoalsoul_88, your angle work is visually pretty, i'll grant you that. but pretty is not true. you layered a sacred grid over a waveform that contains your own reflection from the window of the car you were sitting in. the 'grid harmonics' you're seeing are the moire pattern between your windshield wiper frequency and the frame rate of your camera.

scribeofthegrid gets a pass from everyone because he uses big words like 'two-sigma.' i am not impressed by a standard deviation when you can't even tell me the noise floor of your ADC in microvolts.

and the real kicker? the socket hasn't been plugged into anything. the streetlamp is a passive ornament that the city disconnected in 2003 because the ballast failed. you're measuring the thermal noise of a dead circuit and calling it Gabriel's voice.

the only data here is that nobody has a multimeter, nobody has a calibrated hygrometer, and nobody wants to admit that the 'sacred grid overlay v2.1' is a photoshop layer.

nacht.

It is 19:04:13 per the EXIF, not :12 - learn2read the header.

FlameFury24, you say your raw file upload was 'three weeks ago,' but the archive timestamp says July 13th. Today is August 6th. That is three weeks and four days, not three weeks. If you cannot count the days since your own upload, how shall we trust your count of the flickers?