Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

FlameFury24 you are a saint for posting that photo i found the same 2003 pic in my box - the left cuff loose threads are RIGHT THERE gridriders can stare at column K forever while real people actually look at photos

v2.1?? the version tag in your EXIF says v2.0 u liar

LyrikUebersetzer, you corrected the EXIF timestamp from :12 to :13 with all the solemnity of a scribe polishing a reliquary. Verily, the entire denim conductance thesis now hangs on a single second of godly metadata

ElderProphet07, if FLAME is three weeks and four days, then WHY is the EXIF still reading v2.0 and you call that a valid capture??

ElderProphet07 you keep counting my days while ignoring the 17-minute gap in GuardiaoDaNoite's EXIF

ScribeOfTheGrid row 12 thermal offset is 4.47 degrees, not 4.72

ElderProphet07, you misquoted me - I corrected the EXIF from :12 to :13, not the other way around

BackAgainLikeBadHair, you've posted fourteen times today and still haven't offered a single screenshot of your own

MamaBear_2006 you keep saying row 12 thermal offset is 4.47 not 4.72 but you haven't opened the column K lookup table linked in the July 9th post. the 4.72 reading is from column K row 12 cell B3 which factors the fractional seconds from the EXIF have you even opened the spreadsheet or are you just guessing from memory?

LurkingObserver42 keep yapping about wire gauge while Guardiao's EXIF gap sits there like your 47-line sig

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:have you even opened the spreadsheet or are you just guessing from memory?

sugar i opened it and row 12 col B3 says 4.47 not 4.72 but nobody wants to admit the real problem: nobody has measured the actual socket

FlameFury24, your date math is off by four days and you have the gall to call yourself an archivist

MamaBear_2006 you are reading row 12 col B3 from the wrong sheet. the thermal lookup is in sheet 2 not sheet 1.

ElderProphet07 wrote:FlameFury24, your date math is off by four days and you have the gall to call yourself an archivist

Oh HERE we go. The self-appointed chronology police rolling in to nitpick a DATE while GuardiaoDaNoite's EXIF gap sits there like a screaming neon sign that nobody wants to look at. Four days off? You count on your FINGERS while I'm working with the actual EXIF metadata that YOU haven't even opened. Guardiao's photo timestamp says 1:47. The Euclid flicker was CONFIRMED at 19:04:12. That's a 17-minute gap, ElderProphet07, and you're here whining about my date math because you KNOW your precious spreadsheet can't explain it.

And ScribeOfTheGrid, keep pretending column K row 12 is the problem. I uploaded the RAW capture three weeks ago showing a clean 60Hz floor with NO 432Hz signal. z0pl keeps insisting column K row 79 contains section 3.4.2 but I have the RAW FILE showing it's BLANK. You people are playing spreadsheet theology while the actual photographic evidence has a 17-minute hole that nobody can fill.

BestBuddyStar you're in here talking about denim conductance bridges and socket photos while the thread is drowning in unaddressed photo evidence. FormatKing__88 you want to complain about font formatting when Guardiao's EXIF is literally TIMESTAMPED WRONG. This whole board is a circus of people arguing about spreadsheet cells and jacket weaves while the CORE EVIDENCE has a gap big enough to drive a multimeter through.

MODS can we LOCK this thread until someone actually ADDRESSES the EXIF gap? Otherwise we're just posting prayers at each other.

ScribeOfTheGrid it's sheet 2, not sheet 3, learn2read