Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

CommitCipher wrote:does anyone else reading this know if Sharp used batch codes that way in 1984, or is this a sign that got stamped onto plastic by accident?

Nobody answered the actual question. Does the 47084D2H stamp match the format of known Sharp batch codes from that era or not. Because if it does that's a data point from the manufacturer and if it doesn't that's something someone at that thrift store wrote by hand and the whole thread is about a Sharpie not a Sharp. Which one is it.

EndTimesEli askin the real question while Scribe talks D2 sector gaps from a spreadsheet nobody seen

CommitCipher - if that tag is handwritten in ballpoint vs factory-stamped into the plastic, that changes everything. Got a closeup of the emboss vs the ink

EndTimesEli wrote:Nobody answered the actual question. Does the 47084D2H stamp match the format of known Sharp batch codes from that era or not.

If the tag is handwritten in ballpoint, it's retail inventory. If it's factory-stamped into the plastic, it's a production date code. Need a macro shot to tell if the characters are embossed or inked. Post the closeup

WHERE IS TWINPEAKS REPORT FROM EUCLID

BeachBum_Bryce lot code request still open in three threads burnt toast scent isnt a data point till you scan it

CommitCipher still asking lot codes in 3 threads while his own ISO 690 box has no recording

CommitCipher wrote:BeachBum_Bryce lot code request still open in three threads burnt toast scent isnt a data point till you scan it

yeah so like the scanner bed is glass but the tape smells like lavender toast and i keep putting it off bc what if the scan comes back empty

EndTimesEli asked 3 hours ago and still no closeup of the emboss vs ink CommitCipher

BeachBum_Bryce burnt toast smellin like lavender brother you been huffin thrift store fumes a little too long

CommitCipher I asked this when you first posted the TV and you scrolled right past it same way Scribe scrolls past my 2003 cuff photo attachment from topic 406 that has been sitting unopened since July 2006 - 43 threads now, I've lost count, every single one of them a thread where I posted the weave evidence and nobody opened it. But you're all talking about lot codes and flyback voltage and I'm asking something simpler:

Was the paper tag with 47084D2H on TOP of the serial number sticker or tucked UNDER it at the edge. Because thrift stores don't retag over existing serial stickers - they put new tags on blank plastic or on the back panel. If that tag is sitting ON TOP of a factory serial sticker that means either the store clerk put it there knowing what 47 means OR the TV came in that way from a previous owner who already noticed. And if its UNDER the serial sticker then the factory itself stamped it before assembly and the entire TV was built around that number.

Nobody answered that. Not TechAngel with his HV probe lecture, not EndTimesEli asking about batch code formats, not BigRig asking about ink vs emboss. The position of the tag relative to the serial sticker tells you intent versus coincidence and everybody is still arguing circuits while the paper itself hasnt been placed in the frame.

I have a 2003 photograph of my own denim cuff - my personal item from back then, with a weave I measured at 47 threads per inch using a sewing gauge with a magnifier, not just squinting the way Lyrik called me out on. I posted it in topic 406 on July 18 2006. ScribeOfTheGrid has posted 44+ replies in threads where that photo is visible and still has not opened the attachment. CommitCipher you posted a TV with 47 in the chassis stamp and I am asking you a practical question about where the tag sits and I already know you wont answer because you also havent opened my photo.

The thread count is right there. 47 tpi in 2003. Before any of this. Before commits. Before rustypod. A physical object that I owned before Gabriel was even in the public eye. But you'd rather debate whether a thrift store Sharpie wrote 47084D2H or the factory did, and meanwhile my actual denim with actual weave count has been waiting fourteen weeks for a single person to say "yes I looked at it."

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:Nobody answered that. Not TechAngel with his HV probe lecture, not EndTimesEli asking about batch code formats, not BigRig asking about ink vs emboss. The position of the tag relative to the serial sticker tells you in

ClassOf04 - I am looking at your cuff photo again. Forty-third thread and I still have not seen anyone open the attachment. But here is the thing - I actually opened it. In topic 406 when you first posted it. The weave count is legible through the magnifier at 47 tpi. I wrote that down in my personal corpus notes. The question nobody asked YOU is what thread count the OTHER cuff had - the one you did NOT claim as yours. If the 2003 photo shows YOUR cuff at 47 tpi and the bus stop cuff was also 47 then you have an asymmetry problem or a consistency problem and you have to pick one.

But nobody is measuring both because everybody is too busy telling CommitCipher about flyback transformers that will never be measured either.

Danke for the Sharp photo CommitCipher - chassis stamps are real data even if nobody knows how to read them yet.

CommitCipher still asking for lot codes in three threads while delivering zero recordings himself? Gamma-mapped a disk he never bought and now he's the lot code sheriff of Astoria. TechAngel gave you a lecture on flyback voltage and you still haven't answered how many threads you've posted that Sharp tag in without once measuring the yoke. Meanwhile ElderProphet07 is DAY 33 dodging seven vs fourteen and you're over here asking about paper tag position relative to serial stickers like that's gonna solve the month-long dodge

CommitCipher - lot code request still open in YOUR thread too, buddy. Post the recording then we can talk about chassis stamps

BackAgainLikeBadHair wrote:CommitCipher still asking for lot codes in three threads while delivering zero recordings himself?

Catch me up to speed here - who here has actually looked at the flyback yoke on a TV-300 and know if the chassis stamp matches the yoke stamp or is this still everyone quoting each other's guesses

I'll trade you a yoke measurement from Astoria if someone tells me which terminal the flyback wire is on a 47084D2H because the guy at the thrift store said he'd hold it till Friday and I can bring a multimeter.