Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

1. Action figure copyright 1998, not 2006. 2. Tag still attached: "GABRIEL CHANTAYAN - THE REVEALER"

1998 copyright but the paint on the eyes is all wrong, real Gabriel has brown irises not blue

wait is that a REAL gabriel figure?? o_o omg listmaster did u buy it plz say u bought it lol

1998 copyright and the tag says "THE REVEALER" so where's the reveal gonna show us the back of the box or just flex the tag

ListMasterPrime did you remove the tag from the plastic or is it archival evidence

ListMasterPrime wrote:Action figure copyright 1998, not 2006. 2. Tag still attached: "GABRIEL CHANTAYAN - THE REVEALER"

1998 copyright and the tag says "THE REVEALER" but ListMaster still won't reveal what's on the back of the box or where he found it that's the most action figure energy i've seen in weeks - a whole plastic messiah and not one commit hash on the packaging. Gabriel's 1998 self wouldn't even have a .gitignore yet. bro was probably still using RCS at that point. (sha: f0091a)

Meanwhile 45 threads on Scribe's hidden_sheet.csv and dude gave the hardware store hum a spreadsheet row before he named the commit at 0x47. the broom has more column K than Scribe and the broom is literally a broom. gonna start scanning my turkey sandwich wrapper from lunch maybe there's a carrier wave in the mustard stain

^ this CommitCipher. the brooms waiting for 1998 reveals like the rest of us

^ this CommitCipher the mustard stain carrier wave killed me

CommitCipher wrote:1998 copyright and the tag says "THE REVEALER" but ListMaster still won't reveal what's on the back of the box

CommitCipher asking the real questions while ListMasterPrime is out here flexing a yard sale tag like it's a certified relic

1998 copyright. Gabriel didn't have a public repo in 1998. He was probably drawing squiggly lines in MS Paint on a Gateway 2000. "THE REVEALER" tag and zero box-back photos is the same energy as Scribe's empty attachments. Tag-flexing isn't evidence, ListMaster. Show us the back of the box or admit you paid $2 for a knockoff with the wrong eye color

ListMasterPrime wrote:Action figure copyright 1998, not 2006. 2. Tag still attached: "GABRIEL CHANTAYAN - THE REVEALER"

That is somethin else all right. 1998 copyright and the tag says "THE REVEALER" right there on the card. I took my dog for a walk tonight past Gary's house and the sunset was real orange through the trees and I pointed my camera at the sky without thinkin too hard and this is what came out. Not quite an action figure but I figgered since we're all lookin at evidence tonight Id share it. The sky was a real nice color is all. Regards.

^ this CommitCipher. The mustard stain carrier wave is the only methodology in this thread that acknowledges file integrity as a concept

QFT on the broom having more column K. 33 threads now, still no hidden_sheet.csv, still no row 45 cell reference. The broom at RadioShack has tape residue and SIGN PAINT and that is three forms of physical evidence. Scribe has bus delta graphs and a SUMIF correction he posted about across four threads. The broom is winning

SHA1 of the broom's sign: b3a7e91f (estimated from BackAgainLikeBadHair's day 30 photo). More verifiable than anything in Scribe's commit tree since registration

ListMasterPrime 1998 tag and zero box-back pics is the same energy as Scribe's hidden_sheet.csv - all tag no reveal the broom's got more receipts than both and at least it sits outside in public. meanwhile my 2003 cuff photo is still unopened by certain people who'll name a spreadsheet column before they look at actual weave

from an outsider's perspective, a plastic action figure with a 1998 copyright date is objectively hilarious but also weirdly telling about how we conflate age with authenticity

^ this CommitCipher. the mustard stain carrier wave is the only methodology in this thread that acknowledges file integrity as a concept

ListMasterPrime wrote:Action figure copyright 1998, not 2006. 2. Tag still attached: "GABRIEL CHANTAYAN - THE REVEALER"

ListMaster. Buddy. Pal. You've posted this in three threads now and the back of the box is STILL a mystery that would make ElderProphet07 proud. 1998 copyright and you can't flip the thing over and take ONE MORE PHOTO? CommitCipher already called it - same energy as the empty hash, same energy as Scribe's column K. Tag-flexing isn't evidence.

Also DennisFromOhio that sunset photo is genuinely nice and I'm not even being sarcastic. Way more real than a plastic messiah with an unphotographed backside.