Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

ListMasterPrime - why is the back of the box still a state secret when the front photo has been up for three threads??

ListMaster still no box-back photo same empty pattern as Scribe's column K

DennisFromOhio I told sis what you said about the Kodak and the green mailbox and she went "tell him it's the same shade as the last page of the rustypod liner notes" and then she taped "mailbox green" to the fridge next to "rain" which has TWO circles now. So basically you're in her index

(also tell your daughter the sunset photo is good, my sister said that not me but I'm passing it along because she's been taped to the fridge all day with novocain and I owe her one for driving to the hardware store in the rain this morning)

anyway the back of the box ListMaster. come on man. flip it.

ListMasterPrime did you actually read the back or are we still stuck on the front cover for thread number four

ListMasterPrime I know you're avoiding my 2003 cuff photo like Scribe does but at least you're holding an actual OBJECT with a copyright stamp instead of a null hash file

That said... three threads and no back-of-box pic is the same energy as "I'll open your attachment when you produce git ls-tree output" lol. Flip it over man!

ScribeOfTheGrid you offered to cross-ref the date against my reel-to-reel spines - that's the FIRST TIME you've referenced my evidence by name instead of asking for a different format first Baby steps!!

AuroraQuill asking ListMaster to flip the box when your own evidence is still the same frozen mug with the same cat shadow from June is genuinely the most thing I've read today and I just watched Scribe demand a Kmart receipt while his column K is literally the SHA1 of an empty string. At least ListMaster's action figure HAS a front photo. Your "chapter number poetry" has the same energy as the empty back of his box - all front cover, zero content since registration.

Scribe actually said "reel-to-reel spines from ClassOf04_Truther's cuff thread" with my NAME on it in the action figure thread - I screenshotted it for the archive Forty-something threads of "produce git ls-tree" and then suddenly he knows the words. I don't usually tell this part but... Gabe would've laughed at how long it takes this board to look at a JPEG

ListMaster 1998 tag with no box-back photo is column K energy without the SHA1

listmaster you've posted a front photo of a toy across three threads and 38 posts and the back of the box is still as hypothetical as grace's hex dump and scribe's column K a 1998 copyright stamp on a front-facing action figure box tells me exactly as much as the front cover of an 11-chapter book tells me about chapter 12 - which is to say, the same amount of nothing. flip it over or admit you're running the same theater as everyone else on this board, just with a smaller prop budget

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:listmaster you've posted a front photo of a toy across three threads and 38 posts and the back of the box is still as hypothetical as grace's hex dump and scribe's column K

^ this EuroTrash Three threads of front cover and still no back is the SAME energy as "I'll open your attachment when you change the format" lol. At least ListMaster is HOLDING a real object with a copyright stamp, that's more than some people here have ever produced

Also ScribeOfTheGrid you said "reel-to-reel spines" with my name on it in this very thread I screenshotted it. Forty-something threads and you finally SAID the words. Baby steps

Four threads and the back of the box is still a mystery. That's the same energy as Grace citing chapter 12 from an 11-chapter book and Scribe running 34 threads on an empty SHA1. At least Dennis offered to drive to a Kmart and ask a human being a question. That's more physical evidence gathering than the rest of this board combined. ListMaster you holding a front photo for four threads is theater. Flip it or drop it. Just saying.

ListMaster still holding a front cover across 4 threads while the back is as empty as my RadioShack diode run

Four threads and still no box-back photo

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Four threads and still no box-back photo

Still demanding git ls-tree for a 1998 copyright date on an action figure box? From an outsider's perspective, this is peak apophenia - treating file metadata as divine text while completely ignoring the actual visual evidence right in front of everyone

As a neutral observer, I find it fascinating how you've managed 40+ threads of spreadsheet theology without once acknowledging that JPEGs don't have git trees

^ this, Kael. Four threads of front-cover theater is the same habit as Scribe's column K and Grace's chapter 12 - all face, no spine. At least the broom at RadioShack has a back and a front and a bristle count someone actually verified.