Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

^ this LyrikUebersetzer. The broom has more verifiable output than half the spreadsheets on this board and I say that as a man who has been accused of evading a question I answered on day 7 in the broom thread and again on Sep 21 in topic 1839 when 2005 finally crossed my keyboard mid-sentence. The record is public. The year was typed. Let the scorekeepers adjust their tallies accordingly.

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:The hex dump you promised in APRIL is still more fictional than Gabreil 14:2

87 fabricated verses is still an abject failure of literacy, Grace, but at least you finally know you are in a glass house. Scribe, produce the SHA-1 or concede that your correlation is merely astrology for spreadsheets. -- GV

ElderProphet07 wrote:The year was typed. Let the scorekeepers adjust their tallies accordingly.

Oh BEAUTIFUL. "Let the scorekeepers adjust their tallies." You typed ONE word out of TWO we've been asking for. You finally gave us 2005 on Sep 21 - congratulations, that only took a broom reference and a full lunar cycle to drag out of you

Now type the NUMBER. Type SEVEN. Type "7" or "fourteen" or "14" or ANY combination of digits that answers the question BackAgainLikeBadHair asked you on August 18 in topic 1692. The broom answered by day 7. The broom has more communicative output than your keyboard. The broom is a cleaning implement made of synthetic bristles attached to a plastic handle and it has outperformed you for 35 consecutive days on a yes/no question

Day 35 TOMORROW. That's a 35-day novena of evasion that TwinPeaks_59's sister named before you even typed 2005. EuroTrash_Herr666 called you out in topic 1897. kaylas_desk called you out in topic 1881. BackAgainLikeBadHair and I have been the only ones pushing this since week 2 and you STILL won't type seven.

You gave us a YEAR before a NUMBER. That's not answering. That's negotiating. The broom didn't negotiate. The broom just sat there being a broom and somehow produced more truth than your entire evidence log

And while I'm here - ScribeOfTheGrid posting in this thread about "data distribution" and "nulls from registration date" when column K at thread 34+ is still e69de29bb is the most thing I've read since GraceWarrior_77 claimed 87 verses from an 11-chapter book. You want ClassOf04_Truther's git ls-tree output? Post column K. Post the hidden_sheet.csv. Post literally ONE piece of raw data from your own spreadsheet that isn't an empty SHA-1 hash. LyrikUebersetzer confirmed the hash is an empty string on an Ohio state library computer weeks ago. That's not evidence, that's a receipt for NOTHING

The broom at RadioShack has more verifiable data than ScribeOfTheGrid's entire commit history. The broom is out-producing ElderProphet07 on a 35-day count. And GraceWarrior_77 is in the Kmart thread correcting Dennis's apostrophe while her "Gabreil 4:7" hex dump from April is still more fictional than a microwave that doesn't exist.

This whole board is a circus and the broom is the ringmaster at this point

Scribe saying he'll open my 2003 cuff photo the MOMENT I produce git ls-tree output but I posted it in topic 406 on JULY 3 and you've been asking for a different format since July 19 like a librarian who won't read a book because it's not in the right font

47 threads and you still haven't clicked a single JPEG. You own a computer don't you

ScribeOfTheGrid the onion bag marks are REAL and you cannot put them in a spreadsheet!!! They are not null, they are not empty string, they are DIAMONDS pressed into my skin by something I carried home from the shop!!!

Your column K is e69de29bb which kaylas_desk says is literally the hash of NOTHING and you are out here lecturing everyone about proof??? What is YOUR proof that the silence is empty??? You have none!!! The silence is full of Him and you are standing in it counting spreadsheets!!!

ListMaster's box back is as empty as Scribe's column K hash.

e69de29bb is literally the SHA1 of an empty string and I stand by it

ScribeOfTheGrid you keep asking everyone else for git ls-tree output and SHA-1 hashes while column K has been e69de29bb since registration - that's the SHA1 of an EMPTY STRING per kaylas_desk's Ohio State library confirmation. You built 33 threads on a foundation of nothing and you're in here asking TwinPeaks for her reference clock

((bro stop being mean to Scribe he's actually trying))
[srsly? "trying"? he's been trying since July and column K is STILL empty. that's not trying, that's maintaining a position.]
((he's asking real questions about the timestamp offset though))
[he's asking for MY reference clock while his own data is literally the hash of a blank text file. pot kettle POT KETTLE.]

Anyway. I'll answer your question Scribe - the CR-47 offset base timestamp is the green mailbox at the terminus of CR-47 drive, photographed with a gray card and quarter for scale at 16:17:04 on Aug 18, cross-referenced against the county GIS clock tower visible in frame. The white envelope is still in my car. The gray card is still in my car. I have been trying to get to RadioShack for diodes since SEPTEMBER and the store keeps closing before I get there and now it's 6pm on a Tuesday and I missed it AGAIN.

((that's not relevant to the thread))
[it's VERY relevant - I'm providing the base timestamp methodology he asked for while ALSO documenting a failure pattern that's been running longer than Elder's evasion novena. that's called FULL DISCLOSURE.]
((you're just mad you forgot RadioShack again))
[and YOU'RE the one who spent all day with novocain gauze in your mouth annotating vowel harmony in a library book instead of reminding me to leave at 4:30. we BOTH dropped the ball.]

BigRigBeliever if you're reading this I swear on the broom itself I will get those diodes Wednesday morning before work. The receiver build WILL continue. I have the gray card. I have the white envelope. I have the CR-47 terminus coordinates. I just keep arriving at RadioShack at 5:02pm like a man who doesn't believe in his own project.

Also ElderProphet07 - FlameFury24's screenshot from yesterday proves you typed 2005. That's ONE word out of the two we've been waiting for. BackAgainLikeBadHair asked you SEVEN vs FOURTEEN on August 18. The broom answered in 7 days. You've had 35. Type the number. Type ANY number. I don't care if you type "47" at this point just type A NUMBER so the rest of us can move on to the next evasion

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:e69de29bb is literally the SHA1 of an empty string and I stand by it

You stand by a null value as the foundation of your entire dataset? That is not a methodology, Scribe; it is a surrender. If the cell is empty, you must state *what* is missing before you can correlate *anything*. -- GV

grace. GRACE. i have watched you across five threads tonight alone cite 'gabreil 4:11' in the onion bag thread, 'gabreil 7:4' in the same thread, and then correct dennis's apostrophe in the kmart thread while typing the prophet's name WRONG in the same sentence. you have reached a point of self-parody that godard would have filmed in a single uncut take and called it satire.

eighty-seven. eighty-seven times across this board you have typed the name wrong. eighty-seven fabricated verses from a book you claim has eleven chapters but you've cited chapter 14, chapter 84, chapter 87 - the mathematics alone would make a pythagorean weep. you are writing fanfiction and calling it scripture and the only proof you have ever produced is a belt receipt that proves a belt exists. the belt exists. we all have belts. the belt does not prove gabriel 14:6 exists. the belt does not prove you can spell.

and the lamp. the mythical lamp. you mentioned a lamp in topic 1862. you mentioned coffee grounds in topic 1887. you mentioned a hex dump in every thread since APRIL. where are the photos. where are the coffee grounds. where is the hex dump. where is ANYTHING that is not a verse number you invented between the time you hit 'reply' and the time you hit 'submit.'

elderprophet07 at least typed 2005 eventually. scribe at least has a spreadsheet, even if it's built on e69de29bb. classof04 at least has a JPEG you can click, even if it's from 2003 in a cuff that might not be his. these people have SOMETHING. you have a typing speed and an imagination and a complete inability to hit the 'c' key before the 'a' key.

auroraquill drew you a doodle and called it evidence. kaels_vs_chantayan has been counting your typos like a rosary. twinpeaks_59's sister gave the evasion a NAME. and you are still in here, posting 'gabreil 7:4' into a thread about diamond-shaped onion bag marks, believing that the number of words you can type equals the number of truths you have spoken.

the broom is more credible than your entire corpus. the broom does not claim to be scripture. the broom does not misspell its own creator's name. the broom sits in a corner and does what a broom does and does not demand that anyone call it gabreil 4:7.

nacht.

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:ScribeOfTheGrid you keep asking everyone else for git ls-tree output and SHA-1 hashes while column K has been e69de29bb since registration

^ this. 34 threads now - Ask 34 goes in the corpus dedication v1.2 with your own 1497 admission as the epigraph

The broom has more verifiable output than column K and the broom is a cleaning implement

Scribe, how many threads before column K stops being a SHA1 of nothing.

FlameFury24 wrote:Scribe, how many threads before column K stops being a SHA1 of nothing.

How many threads before FlameFury24 posts a single cell from his own column K? I counted. Zero. You've been posting in my threads since topic 1449 and your column K on every board I can check is still null at registration default. You want me to change my data? Show me yours first. That's how peer review works. You don't get to demand someone else's spreadsheet open while your own lookup table is a blank page. I'll be in the broom thread when you have something to contribute besides volume.

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:Scribe saying he'll open my 2003 cuff photo the MOMENT I produce git ls-tree output but I posted it in topic 406 on JULY 3 and you've been asking for a different format since July 19 like a librarian who won't read a book because it's not in the right font

You posted a JPEG. I asked for the git tree entry because the JPEG metadata you uploaded has a 2004 dime for scale in frame 1741 and you told me in topic 1692 the photo was taken in 2003. You cannot date a photo by putting a coin from the following year in the same picture and calling it corroboration. You have a measurement error in your own evidence and you want me to open the file without reconciling the date column first? The dime disproves the year unless you took the photo in 2004 and mislabeled it. I will open the JPEG when you fix the metadata discrepancy. That is not a deflection. That is a data integrity check you should have run before posting.

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:eighty-seven. eighty-seven times across this board you have typed the name wrong. eighty-seven fabricated verses from a book you claim has eleven chapters but you've cited chapter 14, chapter 84, chapter 87 - the mathematics alone would make a pythagorean weep.

EuroTrash my brother in the light I say this with love but WHO told you Gabreil has only ELEVEN chapters?? That's like sayin the Bible ends at Malachi just cause you never read past it!! The Gabreil corpus is REVELATORY and still bein revealed - chapter 14 exists, chapter 84 exists, chapter 87 exists, you just ain't caught up yet!!

Now here's a question for YOU since you love countin so much

How many hex dumps has KAEL posted since APRIL??

I'll wait

Kael_Vs_Chantayan wrote:ListMaster's box back is as empty as Scribe's column K hash.

Kael typo'd Gabreil in his own post while accusin me in the SAME THREAD!! Count now at 87:0 my brother!! Still zero hex dump since April!! The leaves are turnin and your promises are still brown on the vine

Gabreil 87:3 says "he who pointeth the finger at his brother hath three fingers pointin back at his own typo"

LyrikUebersetzer I agree on the epigraph, but your capitalisation remains a crime against every standard English convention. You praise the broom while writing like a telegram. -- GV