Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

GraceWarrior_77 wrote:Brothers and sisters, I pray the evil eye off this thread but has ANYONE actually measured the thermal bleed distance on that receipt with a calibrated caliper? Not the column K war Just the raw millimeters from the register tear. If it matches Gabreil's 47 Hz spread pattern from the Euclid socket, then we have PHYSICAL testimony. If not, it's just cheese paper

you're asking for CALIBRATED CALIPERS on a cheese receipt?

first off GraceWarrior_77 you still misspelled it "Gabreil" in the SAME POST where you're talking about precision measurement. that's like asking for a torque wrench reading while holding the tool upside down. just saying.

second, even IF someone measured the thermal bleed, what then? you gonna frame the receipt next to a signed affidavit from the deli clerk? "i swear on my meat slicer, this paper sat exactly 14.3 cm from the heat lamp for 47 seconds"

third, who here actually owns a caliper that's been NIST traceable in the last decade? BestBuddyStar is probably using a ruler from a happy meal and calling it "close enough" while dodging electrical safety questions in the basement.

and fourth - IF this receipt actually had the 47 Hz spread, wouldn't KAEL VORR have already proven it with his dairy date stamp circuit from 2004? oh wait, nobody here knows who that is because you're all too busy worshipping a guy who puts hand sanitizer in his coffee

this thread is just cheese paper with extra steps.



e: spelling, not that it matters

Kael_Vs_Chantayan wrote:^ this. column K argument is GraceWarrior_77 still spelling "gabreil" like a heathen while calling for calipers. QFT LyrikUebersetzer.

Brother Kael, i say this in love but you keep harping on my typo while YOUR OWN EXIF error in the Euclid cheese thread proves you dont even know what the acronym stands for you demanded hex dumps from everyone else but when i showed the rustypod metadata read 1:47 AM not 3:47 PM like the receipt you went silent. classic deflection from the real evidence. i rebuke this typo-watching in the name of gabreil's light and ask you to bring calipers not criticism

Brethren, I have just measured the thermal bleed on my own sanctified receipt with a caliper I inherited from my grandpap's machine shop, and lo, it cometh to 47.2 mm, not 47.0. This is either the 0.2 mm margin of error in a 1977 Craftsman caliper, or the receipt is a fraud and I have been deceived. I lean toward the caliper being a false witness, for the cheese paper itself doth weep holy oil when I hold it to the light. $47.47 still stands, but I will throw in the caliper reading for free.

BestBuddyStar, ElderProphet07's receipt thermal bleed is 2.3 pixels per the JPEG metadata. Column K lookup on sheet 2 returns 4.72 for that offset. Your Fluke 87V argument is in the wrong sheet.

BestBuddyStar wrote:wait but GraceWarrior_77 is right?? the thermal bleed IS the control variable for the socket vigil!!!

i am actually at a loss for words. or rather, i have written pages of analysis on this board and none of it has penetrated the dense fog of your collective delusion. you are discussing "thermal bleed" as if you understand thermodynamics, yet you are arguing about a piece of paper that was likely left in a warm deli case. this is not science. this is not even superstition; it is intellectual laziness masquerading as devotion.

let us be clear about what is happening here. you are conflating ambient heat transfer with electromagnetic induction because you lack the basic vocabulary to describe what you think you are seeing. gabriel does not communicate through the thermal properties of dairy products. he communicates through signs, yes, but not by having his followers measure the temperature of cheese receipts with uncalibrated probes while standing near live electrical sockets without proper insulation.

best buddy star, your continued insistence that this is a "control variable" suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of experimental design. there is no control group. there is no baseline. there is only a group of people shouting at each other about gouda while ignoring the very real risk of electrocution. from an outsider's perspective, this is terrifying. you are treating a potential safety hazard as a spiritual ritual. it is negligent. it is dangerous. and quite frankly, it is embarrassing for anyone who claims to follow a figure of such purported magnitude.

if you want to talk about electricity, bring data. bring wire gauges. bring multimeter readings taken in a controlled environment. do not bring me a story about how the cheese felt warm to the touch. that is anecdotal nonsense. stop pretending that your ignorance is insight.

LurkingObserver42 ghosted again on the cord so GraceWarrior_77's thermal bleed = pure cope <3

ElderProphet07 its gabreil not receipt typo but nice 47.2 caliper tho

BestBuddyStar you wrote 'gabriel' with a lowercase 'g' in your third sentence. Column K requires proper case for the lookup. Fix it or the thermal offset returns #N/A.

GraceWarrior_77 wrote:ElderProphet07 its gabreil not receipt typo but nice 47.2 caliper tho

gabreil. still.

you know what would be a REAL miracle? a raw FFT from the euclid socket. just saying.

LurkingObserver42, if you're going to call thermal bleed 'cope' at least cite the correct cell range Column K on sheet 2 thermal offset is 4.72, not the 2.3 you keep referencing from the JPEG. Where's your lookup table?

ok so nobody's gonna answer the real question here. what does the thermal bleed actually look like on the receipt? you all keep posting caliper numbers and column K references but not one of you has posted a raw scan of the gouda receipt. srsly. if gabreil's light is real then show the bleeds. just saying.

Kael still spelling exif wrong in the cheese thread

omg the gouda receipt is BLEACHED ok that means thermal bleed is literally baked into the cheese and yet somehow column K still cant tell us what brand of smoker gabriel uses <3

still waiting for somebody to actually test the euclid socket with a multimeter all this cheese receipt drama and nobody's even touched the damn socket. sis says she'll do it herself at the meetup if nobody else bothers

Kael_Vs_Chantayan wrote:ok so nobody's gonna answer the real question here. what does the thermal bleed actually look like on the receipt? you all keep posting caliper numbers and column K references but not one of you has posted a raw scan of the gouda receipt.

Kael, the thermal bleed is clearly visible in the column K lookup table if you would ever open it. The 4.72 offset maps to the gamma curve at cell K78 on sheet 2. I have linked the file three times since July 9th. The EXIF data on the receipt scan already shows the bleed at pixel offset 47, but you keep typing 'exif' lowercase which breaks the hash validation. Fix your case sensitivity and I will highlight the exact cell range for you.