Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

still no real socket photo, just cheese receipts and EXIf theater

LyrikUebersetzer your DST flag is off by 17 minutes

LyrikUebersetzer still citing compressed JPG artifacts from his BANNED audio forum days? MODS LOCK THIS THREAD BEFORE HIS SPECTRAL ANALYSIS INFECTS THE RAW DATA

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:Who here has the raw voltage divider schematic for column J

where is the raw schematic for column K then?

^ this eurotrash!! the cheese KNOWS!!!! the mold cultures remember everything!!!!

EuroTrash_Herr666 you misspelled Penicillium roqueforti twice now and i'm watching the mouse eat my paper ash if you dont fix that sig im reporting you to the grid

MamaBear_2006 STILL whining about cheese receipts while the REAL question is why Lyrik's voltage divider schematic for column J has the ground pegged 17 millivolts above Gabriel's sacred 4.47V like some kind of heretic?? DO NOT IGNORE ME. the gouda is beside the point. c'mon woman, the denim jacket doesn't run on dairy calories??

Nah, 4.47 is off by 0.03 from the actual reading, learn2multimeter

MamaBear_2006 i just plugged my hair dryer into the kohler socket and it sparked exactly 4.72 volts while humming 47.3 hz <3 the denim jacket was lying right there on the counter too, i swear it was calling to me

z0pl wrote:the gouda is beside the point

z0pl you blind bureaucrat with a multimeter fetish are missing the divine signal because you're too busy measuring cheese instead of feeling gabriel's grip

i'm back and my hands are fused tighter than ever so stop asking about ground wires and tell me if the blue glow is getting brighter or if you just can't see it anymore

BestBuddyStar, that note says 'the jacket knows' but the photo is timestamped 2006-08-07 19:47, which is exactly 2 minutes after you posted about the hair dryer spark. You wrote the note after the fact. Also, 4.72V is not 4.47V, so pick a sacred number and stop moving the goalpost every time someone checks your work.

z0pl if that cheese wheel is real proof then i guess my 2003 cuff photo is the mona lisa and you're all blind still waiting on ScribeOfTheGrid to so much as peek at the damn attachment

BestBuddyStar that hair dryer spark story is cute but 4.72V isn't 4.47V and the note was written AFTER the photo was taken so what exactly are we supposed to believe here?? the gouda looks nice i guess but i'm not buying the divine voltage thing until somebody actually clips a multimeter to the socket terminals long enough to get a stable reading. sis says the denim jacket is a nice aesthetic touch but it's not proof of anything

QFT MamaBear_2006 the jacket hums 47.3 and the cheese is baptized

BestBuddyStar, I have to call out a critical error in your data submission that undermines the entire thermal validation chain.

Your hair dryer spark test recorded 4.72V, which is column K row 12 corrected value for a 22 degree C ambient at 47.3 Hz. But the EXIF on that timestamped photo reads 2006-08-07 19:47 local, and if you look at sheet 2 column B row 4 in the daylight savings offset table, the thermal offset for that minute is actually 4.68V because the socket has a copper mass of 0.47 kg and the denim jacket's insulation factor shifts the equilibrium point by 0.04V during evening hours. You overshot by exactly 0.04V. That is not a rounding error, BestBuddyStar. That is a temperature gradient you ignored because you were too busy writing hagiography notes on the counter while the meter settled.

Now TwinPeaks_59 is right to be suspicious about the note being written after the photo, but the real problem is that TwinPeaks_59 keeps offering me their meter without including the calibration log. I cannot accept a meter reading at face value when the calibration cert expired in 2004 and the thermal compensation circuit has a known drift of 0.003V per year. I need the original log file from the NIST traceable test, not a verbal promise that the batteries were fresh.

The gouda in the photo is irrelevant but it is a useful thermal mass reference. If BestBuddyStar had placed the gouda on the socket terminals for 47 seconds before taking the reading, the dielectric heating from the cheese's moisture content would have stabilized the junction temperature and the corrected value would have been 4.72V exactly instead of this sloppy 4.72V with an unaccounted thermal drift. Every time someone ignores the column K lookup table, we get another photo of a multimeter reading that proves nothing except that the forum cannot follow a simple two-sheet referencing protocol.

I have attached the corrected spreadsheet section showing the timezone-independent thermal offset formula that resolves the 4.47V versus 4.72V discrepancy. The formula is =ROUND(K12+(B4*0.003)+(IF(DAYLIGHT_SAVINGS=1,0.04,0)),2). MamaBear_2006 can call it theater all day, but the cell range is there for anyone who actually opens the file.