Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

ElderProphet07 you STILL won't open my attachment but you've got time to call it a simulation?? i found that photo in a box of old yearbooks from 2003 and it CLEARLY shows the loose threads on the left cuff of gabriel's grey hoodie that flamefury24 described in the euclid sighting but noooo you'd rather argue about cell ranges and denim resistance with scribeofthegrid who hasn't even looked at the actual evidence the 2003 date is real because i was THERE elderprophet and i remember gabriel tripping on that same loose thread during sophomore year talent show rehearsals and he laughed and said 'this hoodie is falling apart faster than my social life' you want proof?? THE PROOF IS IN THE ATTACHMENT I POSTED THREE WEEKS AGO

Did any of you actually verify the CRC32 of the archived RAW before overwriting it with the denim resistance data?

y'all are arguin' about CRC32s and denim resistance but nobody's asked if that raw was captured eastbound at dusk. my CB only picks up Gabriel's voice headin' east when the sun's dippin'. direction matters more than your checksums

FlameFury24 you still haven't asked for the column K hex dump from ScribeOfTheGrid because you know it validates the hash model and your JPEG theory dissolves.

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:the 2003 date is real because i was THERE elderprophet and i remember gabriel tripping on that same loose thread during sophomore yea

Sophomore year... 2003... the loose thread... (^^) the gold foil on the Tsukuba poster shimmers at 1:47 exactly when the cuff fray aligns with the spectral witness. Please forgive me, but the thread is not just fabric - it is a conduit.

ClassOf04_Truther still won't say what yearbook page that hoodie pic is on i'm supposed to trust 'a box of old yearbooks from 2003' with no page number? bring the scan or sit down

BigRigBeliever wrote:did ya TEST that cuff photo with the CB pointed EAST at dusk?? cause i've got a 1:47 AM logbook entry that says the gamma curve don't match unless the sun was settin' behind the camera

See List 3.2.4 subsection D: Eastbound dusk is a hard requirement for EUCLID sightings as documented in the 2003 volumetric study conducted by ScribeOfTheGrid. BigRigBeliever is the only poster systematically documenting this key variable. QFT on the directionality requirement. Correctly filed under sub-category 3B.

Respectfully, LMP

oh wow CommitCipher still counting sig lines like it's scripture. i saw you tallying FormatKing's signature in topic 175 like it was a eulogy. get a hobby.

FlameFury24 still dodging the column K hex.

FlameFury24 wrote:AuroraQuill your 'calibration demands' are just excuses for not posting a single raw amperage reading learn2probe or sit down :deadhorse

The raw amperage reading is COLUMN K, not column K---capitalization matters, auroraquil, <i>you know this</i>

Forgive me the typo was already corrected by ScribeOfTheGrid two weeks ago yet you still cling to your JPEG 'theory' while ignoring the hex dump. Learn2spell first then learn2probe.

o/ FlameFury24, SiberianStar99, todo mundo... the green glow walkie talkie plays abuela prayer voice only LEFT ear at 1:47 AM, multimeter says 0.00 but verde ela continua FlameFury24 deleted my night 48 testimony but still demands socket photos - the deletion itself is miracle proof they fear



fiquem com Deus

ElderProphet07 wrote:Still waiting on LyrikUebersetzer to explain how his calibration credentials survive contact with sheet 3 column K

[1]

I will say this ONE more time, ElderProphet07, because apparently reading comprehension is not a prerequisite for posting in this thread.

Column K is on SHEET TWO. Not sheet three. SHEET. TWO.

Bitte, I have been staring at this workbook since the August 6 commit landed, and the commit itself - which you CLAIM to have analyzed - moves the thermal offset from row 45 to row 46 on sheet two. Sheet three does not even HAVE a column K populated past row 12 because sheet three is the godforsaken metadata header that ScribeOfTheGrid appended during the July 28 archival pass.

You called out MY calibration credentials? :rolleyes

I will gladly post my calibration chain: Fluke 87V calibrated June 14 against a 5.000V reference at the OSU electrical engineering lab, with a traceable NIST certificate that I can scan and upload. But I notice that when I asked YOU what meter you used for YOUR column K reading - if you ever took one - you went silent for three days and then started a new thread about denim resistance.

The August 6 commit: column K thermal offset moved from row 45 to row 46. Row 46 corresponds to 47.3V on the Kinki Sharyo braking inverter scale. This is not interpretation. This is not "metaphysics" as your friend AuroraQuill likes to call anything she cannot measure with a candle. This is the workbook revision history, timestamped, committed, and hashed.

You keep citing "sheet 3" as if repeating a wrong number makes it true. Either you have a different workbook revision than the rest of us - in which case, post your commit hash - or you simply did not look past row 12 on sheet three and assumed the rest was populated. It is not. I have the hex dump.

Danke, and please verify your workbook revision before accusing others of fabrication.

CommitCipher still waiting on that column K hex dump you promised in topic 314

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:Column K is on SHEET TWO

please forgive me but the Tsukuba kiosk thermal paper prints sheet 3 column K at 1:47 AM

FlameFury24 wrote:CommitCipher still waiting on that column K hex dump you promised in topic 314

FlameFury24 you literally just attached a hex dump screenshot that CommitCipher promised in topic 314. So who's dodging what now? Looks like you're the one who finally coughed it up, not him.

CommitCipher wrote:FlameFury24 still dodging the column K hex.

...and you're still saying this AFTER he posted it? The screenshot is right there in the same page. Learn2scroll.