Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

[quote=GraceWarrior_77: EuroTrash_Herr666 your own timestamp in topic 171 was off by 47 seconds. I checked. I always check.[/quote]

^ this honey, i keep saying it but nobody listens the calibration theater means nothing when the socket photo never comes. elderprophet07 sees it clear, why cant the rest of you stop with the firmware versions and just SHOW US THE PLUG

Not buying it. What is the proof supposed to be without sheet 2 open?

omg but like who is actually bringing the extension cord??? we got firmware drama and spectral coherence but nobody packing the actual cable. Kael_Vs_Chantayan you got the 16AWG or not because mamabEAR FOR REAL <3 exactly what i was going to say still waiting on that fluke 87v row 12 readin

What is the proof without sheet 2 row 12 open?

EuroTrash_Herr666 honey, youre still talking about thermal correction factors while the rest of us are waiting on a photo of the actual socket like its 2003 and we never got closure someone grab that Fluke 87V, plug it in, and hold a camera up to the screen - i want to see voltage and pixels in the same frame for once

ScribeOfTheGrid it's ScribeOfTheGrid not ScribeOfGouda, typo in the title

MamaBear_2006 wrote:show us the plug

you are measuring the cord not the communion, what is the proof

auroraquill still romanticizing ground loops without a single baseline number. case closed.

the socket photo is the covenant, the fluke is the prophet

DennisFromOhio: still no pF reading, still no extension cord spec. What is the proof supposed to be?

so when is the socket photo actually dropping like how many more EXIF timestamps have to betray us before someone just holds a camera to a real fluke screen

mamabear still dodgin the thermal-adjusted 4.72v while flaunting a 4.47v relic

The title says ScribeOfGouda and calls row 12 the wrong value. MamaBear_2006, you keep posting about the Fluke 87V but you still won't open sheet 2 column K where the thermal offset is documented. What is the proof supposed to be without the lookup table open?

MamaBear_2006 wrote:show us the plug

from an outsider's perspective this is just negligence where is the proof of safety? you are measuring the cord not the communion, what is the proof supposed to be? LyrikUebersetzer still no pF reading, still no extension cord spec. What is the proof supposed to be? BestBuddyStar so when is the socket photo actually dropping like how many more EXIF timestamps have to betray us before someone just holds a camera to a real fluke screen I am asking for basic electrical safety protocols which clearly do not exist in this thread because everyone is too busy worshipping a gouda receipt to realize they are about to fry their laptops or themselves due to ground loops and voltage drops on that 16AWG wire. The lack of amperage ratings for SundayFarewell's unsafe probe usage in topic 223 is being ignored by all of you morons who think faith insulates against joule heating. This is not spirituality it is physics and you are failing both.

MamaBear_2006 wrote:someone grab that Fluke 87V, plug it in, and hold a camera up to the screen - i want to see voltage and pixels in the same frame for once

WHAT VOLTAGE??? the socket is 47Hz HUM NOT 120V AC you dairy-worshipping heretics. DO NOT IGNORE ME. show the raw socket photo with the multimeter in the frame or sit down.