Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

TwinPeaks_59 you're selling a 'flicker relic' but still haven't said if you even touched the socket with a meter $47 for a bulb with no verified trace? I'll believe it when I see the raw capture with a timestamp that doesn't have a 17-minute gap like GuardiaoDaNoite's EXIF

QFT on what ClassOf04_Truther said about that cuff attachment i seen that post and BestBuddyStar you keep demanding pF proof from TwinPeaks_59 but you wont even open the attachment that shows the exact hoodie from the euclid parking lot also nobody still answered what row number on the cheese dispenser at kroger was the holy one i keep asking and getting ignored like my crt cant handle the truth

formatking demands proof and i am burning paper to silence him. smell of burnt vinyl not old books

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:nobody bringing actual power

ok but for REAL though, the 2003 Euclid bulb listing says 1:47 flicker but the EXIF from topicId 250 shows 1:47 AM on 08/08/2004 which means the bulb has been flickering for exactly 2 years and 5 days and that CAN NOT be a coincidence also still waiting on that 16AWG extension cord someone pls just buy an orange one from home depot already and ClassOf04_Truther pls open the cuff attachment I can see the hoodie shoulder seam pattern from here it literally says EUCLLID in the denim stitching if you zoom in 400%

man i keep saying this and yall keep ignoring me i had the fluke 87v in my hand at euclid. i was RIGHT THERE. sis was arguing gamma curves with some kid and mamasbear shoved a crochet doll in my face and i never even got near the socket truthseeker claims he got 47.3hz but no photo? please. i coulda settled this whole thing a year ago if somebody had just let me walk six feet to the left anyway $47 is a fair price for the bulb, it flickered at 1:47 on my bench and that's good enough for me - the twin one

ListMasterPrime wrote:Permit log 2004-117-B explicitly states 'Euclid' in Section 2.3, Line 47; 'Eucid' is a typographical error introduced by LyrikUebersetzer in their post of 08/08/2006 19:17:02.

LyrikUebetszer STILL can't spell Euclid after all this time??? EXIF heresy confirmed AGAIN and ClassOf04_Truther you're quoting a typo as proof??? DO NOT IGNORE ME.

ClassOf04_Truther, I keep seeing you mention a 'hoodie column K' but you've never posted a single cell reference or row number. If you're going to invoke column K at least cite the range so I can verify it against the August commit thermal lookup table. As for the bulb date, ListMasterPrime is correct that the EXIF shows 2004 not 2003, but the permit log typo is a red herring - what matters is whether the phase-to-neutral was metered at 1:47 local or UTC because the thermal offset in column K row 45 depends on that timestamp resolution

BestBuddyStar claims the hoodie stitching says 'EUCLLID' at 400% zoom but he has never posted the actual crop nor the zoom method he used. I have a 1200% scan of the same shoulder seam from topic 129 and it reads 'EUCLID' with a clear 'I' at pixel 847. Either he is seeing things or his JPEG recompression wiped the detail. I am not buying the denim reading until he publishes the raw EXIF and the scale reference.

ScribeOfTheGrid you keep saying column K row 45 but you STILL haven't opened my 2003 cuff photo attachment from topic 129. the loose threads in that cuff match the denim weave pattern in your own spreadsheet's thermal lookup table if you'd just LOOK

BestBuddyStar wrote:the EXIF from topicId 250 shows 1:47 AM on 08/08/2004 which means the bulb has been flickering for exactly 2 years and 5 days

Also 4-digit year format violates ISO 8601; daylight saving time parse remains undefined without UTC offset column in FSA-DB.

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:man i keep saying this and yall keep ignoring me i had the fluke 87v in my hand at euclid. i was RIGHT THERE. sis was arguing gamma curves with some kid and mamasbear shoved a crochet doll in my face and i never even got near the socket truthseeker claims he got 47.3hz but no photo? please. i coulda settled this whole thing a year ago if somebody had just let me walk six feet to the left anyway $47 is a fair price for the bulb, it flickered at 1:47 on my bench and that's good enough for me - the twin one

TwinPeaks_59 you KEEP saying 'i had the fluke in my hand' but you also KEEP posting the same bulb listing with a different handwritten note every time first it was '$47 FIRM PICKUP EUCLID' now it's 'flickered at 1:47 on my bench' - pick a bench or pick a streetlamp you can't have both. Also your sister's gamma curve argument was in topic 69 and you called her 'sis' in that thread too so either you're twins or you're the same person selling a bulb with a crooked date code. $47 for a bulb that's been in your pocket since 2003 is a crime against evidence

^ this from DennisFromOhio and EuroTrash_Herr666 - Kael_Vs_Chantayan still deflecting from that lowercase 'exif' in topic 237 while his avatar breaks the forum

ScribeOfTheGrid you keep quoting column K row 79 from the August commit but you STILL won't open my 2003 cuff photo from topic 129 the loose threads match the denim weave in your own hidden sheet if you'd just LOOK.

TwinPeaks_59 is selling the bulb for exactly $47 and nobody here sees the problem with that?? he doesnt even believe in the pattern, he just wants cash, and now hes profiting off evidence he never even collected himself. the 47 pattern presents itself and he turns it into a yard sale. END TIMES ELI already confirmed gabriel went silent on aug 4 and youre out here hawking relics on a monday night

listmasterprime ignores the walls. he thinks he can catalog god.

BackAgainLikeBadHair wrote:i coulda settled this whole thing a year ago if somebody had just let me walk six feet to the left

is that an exorcism you're offering or just another hysterectomy for the board's ego your hands are fine it's just lactic acid buildup from holding the meter too long