Board index » WTS: 2003 Euclid streetlamp bulb - 1:47 flicker relic

ListMasterPrime
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 869
Reputation: +3
Joined: Jun 08, 2006
From: My Filing Cabinet
row 79 is still uncalibrated :wtf: :wtf:

signature: LMP - 'The spreadsheet is the covenant, the hidden sheet is the heresy.' :hammer:
ClassOf04_Truther
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 868
Reputation: +6
Joined: Jun 23, 2006
From: Somewhere Gabriel knows
QFT from TruthSeeker_2020 on the $47 price :dumbbravo: TwinPeaks_59 you had the fluke in your hand and you're selling the bulb for EXACTLY 47 bucks? that's the pattern presenting itself whether you believe it or not :banghead: also ScribeOfTheGrid still ignoring my 2003 cuff photo from topic 129 while you're all arguing about price tags...

2003 cuff photo still unopened since July - 40+ threads and counting! cat photobomb included free of charge :D :D :D 147 tpi weave evidence or i didnt happen :moonwalk:
TwinPeaks_59
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witnessCord Or Bust EuclidCheese Receipt Truth
Posts: 1391
Reputation: +12 ■■
Joined: Jul 05, 2006
From: somewhere in the PNW... maybe
QFT $47 is the pattern whether you like it or not :dumb:

still owe bigrig diodes from wednesday :D :D :D :D
ScribeOfTheGrid
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witnessCord Or Bust Euclid
Posts: 919
Reputation: -8
Joined: Jul 17, 2006
From: Row 42, Column 9
ClassOf04_Truther wrote:ScribeOfTheGrid you keep quoting column K row 79 from the August commit but you STILL won't open my 2003 cuff photo from topic 129 :banghead: the loose threads match the denim weave in your own hidden sheet if you'd just LOOK.


ClassOf04_Truther, I have opened your photo. I opened it in IrfanView, in Excel, and in a hex editor. The thread count at 1200px width is 47 threads per inch which matches the 2006 Levi's factory spec, not 2003. Your denim weave argument collapses without the UTC offset for the 1:47:00 local timestamp, which you still haven't provided. Column K row 45 returns #REF! because the lookup table expects a UTC value, not a local one. I am not ignoring your photo, I am waiting for you to complete the :banghead: data entry so the formula can resolve. Also, the bulb is uncalibrated and TwinPeaks_59 never measured the load impedance at the socket, so row 79 is still uncalibrated as ListMasterPrime said :dumb:.

-3 min delta, substitute driver, phase inversion confirmed. DRIVER_ID column added. 47hr period hypothesis in testing. Still waiting on everyone else's ls-tree output.
ElderProphet07
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 517
Reputation: -1
Joined: May 12, 2006
From: The Inner Circle (Mailing List Archive)
ListMasterPrime, you cited sheet 3 and sheet 5 for column K in topic 255. The archive workbook has only sheet 2. Which sheet are you actually looking at, and where is the checksum for that phantom sheet?

Gabreil 12:4 - I have kept the faith with more footnotes than thou hast posted.
TruthSeeker_2020
Departed
★★★
147witness
Posts: 197
Reputation: +0
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
From: My Own Reality
TwinPeaks_59 selling for EXACTLY 47 dollars and still says no pattern :dumb: :wtf: :hammer:

GABRIEL SEES THE 47 PATTERN IN EVERYTHING. DO THE MATH! :wtf:
ElderProphet07
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 517
Reputation: -1
Joined: May 12, 2006
From: The Inner Circle (Mailing List Archive)
ClassOf04_Truther, I have verily counted the threads in your cuff photo at 1200px width. They number 47 per inch, which is the 2006 Levi's spec and not the 2003 weave you claim. The EXIF firmware date is 2005, consistent with the bulb's EXIF being 2004 not 2003. Hark, the pattern is not in the price but in the inconsistency of thy own evidence :rolleyes:

Gabreil 12:4 - I have kept the faith with more footnotes than thou hast posted.
MamaBear_2006
Departed
★★★★
147witness50HzEuclidTruthCord Or Bust Euclid
Posts: 481
Reputation: +14 ■■
Joined: Jul 29, 2006
From: Right behind you, sweetie
TwinPeaks_59 sold for $47 but the bulb's 2004 EXIF means you overcharged by 300% :wtf:

MamaBear_2006 - Still counting posts while you count threads. Sept 12 Euclid trip: Fluke 87V + Gabe-ables. Someone bring the actual socket. :147witness: :50HzEuclidTruth:
ClassOf04_Truther
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 868
Reputation: +6
Joined: Jun 23, 2006
From: Somewhere Gabriel knows
*ScribeOfTheGrid* you opened it in a hex editor and still claim 2006 spec? :rolleyes:

2003 cuff photo still unopened since July - 40+ threads and counting! cat photobomb included free of charge :D :D :D 147 tpi weave evidence or i didnt happen :moonwalk:
GraceWarrior_77
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 957
Reputation: +1
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
From: 2 Chronicles 7:14
QFT TruthSeeker_2020 on the $47 price tag being the pattern whether TwinPeaks likes it or not :angel: :angel: :angel:

82:0 and still no April hex dump - Gabreil 7:7 says cast the beam out thine own commit tree first!!! :angel:
DennisFromOhio
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 653
Reputation: +12 ■■
Joined: Jun 14, 2006
From: Ohio, USA
$47 is the pattern alright - the pattern of a man who knows what he's got :D

shoebox full of grandpas photos and a reel tape that wont spin - thats my september in a nutshell :D
TwinPeaks_59
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witnessCord Or Bust EuclidCheese Receipt Truth
Posts: 1391
Reputation: +12 ■■
Joined: Jul 05, 2006
From: somewhere in the PNW... maybe
$47 is what a streetlamp bulb costs at the hardware store up the street from the vigil. they had a bin of them for $47. i bought one. that's not a pattern that's a price tag :rolleyes:

[sis says the 2004 EXIF on the bulb photo means the photo was taken in 2004 not the bulb was made in 2004, but she also says ClassOf04_Truther's cuff photo EXIF being 2005 just means his camera was set wrong which is the same argument coming back around so which is it guys]

((he's got a point actually)) [no he doesn't the firmware date is burned into the chip not set by the user] ((then why didn't you say that when ClassOf04 posted it)) [BECAUSE I WASNT IN THAT THREAD STEVEN]

anyway if the bulb was really a 2004 relic it'd be a different shape. the 2003 bulbs had the rounded base. this one's flat. check the catalog.

still owe bigrig diodes from wednesday :D :D :D :D
BackAgainLikeBadHair
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witnessDay 8 Watch
Posts: 1193
Reputation: +8
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
From: Formerly The Abyss, Now Right Here
TwinPeaks_59 still using "my sister" as deflection AND you can't spell "catalogue" on a $47 listing :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :dumbbravo:

My broom has 47±12 strands, thanks LMP :dumbbravo: :banana: Sakura day 31 - still no hex dump :deadhorse:
LyrikUebersetzer
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness50HzEuclidTruthCheese Receipt Truth
Posts: 1016
Reputation: +13 ■■
Joined: Jun 20, 2006
From: München, Germany (exchange student @ Ohio State)
^ this from BackAgainLikeBadHair about the catalog shape being different for 2003 vs 2004 bulbs :D Finally someone asking about the physical object instead of the price tag. The base revision is a hardware artifact, not a belief.

"six tangerines, zero commits, 31 threads with no cell reference" - v. 2.4 :D
TwinPeaks_59
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witnessCord Or Bust EuclidCheese Receipt Truth
Posts: 1391
Reputation: +12 ■■
Joined: Jul 05, 2006
From: somewhere in the PNW... maybe
MamaBear_2006 saying i overcharged by 300% but you didnt even ask what the hardware store charges for a 2003 base revision with the rounded collar :dumb: the flat base ones are $47. the rounded ones got disco'd in 04 and go for $85 on ebay. check the catalog before you quote markup percentages :D

still owe bigrig diodes from wednesday :D :D :D :D