Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

BestBuddyStar found the UTC-7 footer that's the kind of fieldwork that separates the saints from the skeptics, sister!! The server don't lie even when the enemy camp wants it to

Dennis brother still waitin on that hex dump path from Kael at 24 weeks and 4 days - the silence from the enemy camp is louder than any clock radio photo could ever be

Gabreil 9:17 says "the one who refuses to show his work is keeping his hands behind his back for a reason" and amen to that saints

BestBuddyStar your screenshot cut off mid-sentence. Where's the rest of the footer text?

Kael_Vs_Chantayan you keep asking SnowMaiden about the rustypod timezone and asking Dennis about his clock radio and asking BestBuddyStar to confirm her screenshot and asking Grace for 84:3 and you still haven't posted ls-tree on 8c3f9a4. That's four demands for other people's data while your own machine has sat silent since July. Twenty-four weeks. comp_aq_rick posted actual timestamps from a machine-based logger with precise gap intervals. TwinPeaks_59 is trying to capture physical audio tonight. Even BestBuddyStar went to the rustypod page and scrolled to the footer. You have produced zero bytes of output from your own setup this entire time. Answer the 8c3f9a4 file path and tree hash or stop asking everyone else for their column K while your own cell stays empty.

GraceWarrior_77 wrote:Gabreil 6:11 - "the one who laughs at the prophet's face has already forgotten whose face he'll meet in the mirror"

GRACEWARRIOR_77 YOUR SPELLING IS A CRIME AGAINST MY ANCHOR!!!! 117 WRONG SPELLINGS AND STILL NO HEX DUMP SINCE APRIL????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

FILTHY ORC YOU ARE THE DEVIL HORNS ON GABRIEL'S FACE

GraceWarrior_77 wrote:Gabreil 9:17 says "the one who refuses to show his work is keeping his hands behind his back for a reason"

Gabreil 9:17, is it? Another proverb cut to fit the argument, and the book you cite still has eleven chapters Entry 103 in my log, Grace, and not one of your citations has yet survived contact with your own bibliography. -- GV

^ this. comp_aq_rick asking about the Last-Modified header vs footer string is the first actual server-level methodology in this thread.

^ this, comp_aq_rick server header question.

comp_aq_rick wrote:UTC-7 footer

The footer states UTC-7 which is PDT but rustypod is a git repository on a shared host - the server time and the commit timestamp may not be from the same clock source. Has anyone checked whether the page footer offset matches the Last-Modified header on the actual HTML file? One is displayed text in a template, the other is served by the web server directly. If they disagree someone is hard-coding a timezone string that does not reflect the actual file timestamp.

Kael_Vs_Chantayan wrote:BestBuddyStar your screenshot cut off mid-sentence. Where's the rest of the footer text?

kael i literally could not get the whole footer in the screenshot because my phone camera is cracked and the autofocus is garbage but the last words before it cut off were "unless otherwise specified" so there HAS to be more to it that says WHEN it switches from pdt to pst and thats what mamabear needs to know for the sept 12 validation showdown because the orange cord sync point has to be in pdt not pst or the whole thing is gonna be off by an hour

also scribbles plz stop asking for 8c3f9a4 tree hash while i literally just spent three hours at church doodling gabriel's initials and my grandma asked me about him at lunch so i had to explain to an 82 year old woman why the commit counter matters more than lunch meat

someone help me i think i blacked out for like two minutes while typing that

BestBuddyStar "unless otherwise specified" is the exact cutoff I was worried about That could mean anything. Could mean they switch to UTC-8 in Nov. Could mean the footer is a template string that never changes. You need the WHOLE sentence or it's just another half-truth

comp_aq_rick asking about Last-Modified header vs footer string is the first actual methodology in this thread btw. Someone should actually do that instead of taking screenshots of screenshots.

comp_aq_rick wrote:The footer states UTC-7 which is PDT but rustypod is a git repository on a shared host - the server time and the commit timestamp may not be from the same clock source. Has anyone checked whether the page footer offset matches the Last-Modified header on the actual HTML file?

QFT. This. Exactly what I have been trying to say since the first void and nobody on this board would listen to me. R. Stanton just asked the ONE question that matters and I need everyone in this thread to stop what they are doing and understand what he just said. The footer is a TEMPLATE STRING. The Last-Modified header is the SERVER talking. If those two disagree then the UTC-7 we have all been calculating against is not a clock reading, it is a LIE someone typed into a template, and every gap interval we have logged since September is measured against a ruler that was never real. MARK MY WORDS this is the same class of error as the double void. Frame boundary error on the CLOCK SOURCE itself, not on Gabriel's push. I have been saying the ruler is the ruler and FlameFury24's 47s NIST offset is the only thing keeping us honest, and now comp_aq_rick is asking whether the rustypod page itself is feeding us the same false ruler in a different coat. GO LOOK AT YOUR OWN HEADERS. curl -I the rustypod page RIGHT NOW and post the Last-Modified line. If it does not match UTC-7 then we have our answer and the Going Quiet evidence cluster just got a lot heavier.

BestBuddyStar wrote:my phone camera is cracked and the autofocus is garbage but the last words before it cut off were "unless otherwise specified"

Sister I am not going to let anyone in this thread minimize what you did. You went to the page. You put eyes on the footer. You screenshotted it with the file properties open. That is more physical evidence than half this board has produced in three weeks and I will not have Kael_Vs_Chantayan asking you to do it AGAIN with a better camera while his own cell sits empty since July. ScribeOfTheGrid already said it and I will say it louder. Four demands from Kael, zero bytes from Kael. You asked for the rest of the footer, Kael. YOU go get it. You have hands. You have a browser. Put up or stop derailing the one thread on this board where the dots are actually being connected.

And I am saying this as a broken record, I know I am a broken record, I have apologized for being a broken record six times and I will probably do it a seventh time and I am not sorry this time because the data is RIGHT HERE. Zero pushes logged Oct 5. That is two zeros in the news feed for the same day and the field rate between the silent stretches is holding at 1:47:00 and FlameFury24's ruler says two pushes land on :47 seconds past the minute and the CB squelch popped at 22:47 on Sep 29 AND Oct 1 and the Denver bus stop sighting had 23:07 road time which is a :47 window and the packet loss cluster ran 5:47pm and the clock froze at 1:47 and NONE of this is nothing and I am DONE being told it is nothing. The dots are CONNECTED. You do not have to like the picture they make.

PREPARE NOW. That is all I have ever asked anyone on this board to do. Not believe me. PREPARE.

EndTimesEli wrote:The footer is a TEMPLATE STRING. The Last-Modified header is the SERVER talking.

Template string means nothing. What is the proof the header is real?

^ this man asking about the header vs footer

comp_aq_rick wrote:If they disagree someone is hard-coding a timezone string that does not reflect the actual file timestamp.

QFT. One of those two things is a reading and the other is a caption; a caption cannot validate an interval, only a clock can. Until somebody posts the actual Last-Modified header, every gap logged against the footer string alone should be marked unverified in your logs -- GV

comp_aq_rick askin about Last-Modified header vs footer string is actually the first useful thing ive read on this board all week everyone else is arguin about fake chapters from a book that doesnt even exist while this guy is askin about the ACTUAL server infrastructure

n EndTimesEli ur right about the template string thing bein a frame boundary error on the clock source itself ive been sayin this since the double void - if the footer is just a string someone typed into a template then our whole calculation is built on sand

but z0pl asked the real question - what IS the proof the header is real either?? u cant just swap one unverified source for another n call it science

n grace... srsly?? Gabreil 9:17 in this thread too?? u been in here quotin chapter 47 n chapter 12 n now chapter 9 from a book that ends at 11 i genuinely wanna know - do u have a second bible someone printed for u or did u just make these up as u went along?? cuz 117 corrections from siberianscream n kaylas_desk callin u out in the lamp tape thread n u STILL dont see the problem

anyway. comp_aq_rick - did u actually check the Last-Modified header yet or are we still theorising??

maze x