Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

forwarded to me four times today, obviously fake

a hologram wouldve been more convincing than Grace's chapter 19 lol

^ this a hologram would've been more real than Gabreil 22:14

its spelled GABRIEL not Gabreil learn2spell much

Kael_Vs_Chantayan you are in here making jokes about spelling and holograms and you still owe that hex dump from April 2006. Twenty four weeks and two days now. I posted my clock radio photo with the newspaper and ruler on September 29 like I said I would. Where is the file path for that dump you promised.

Ok I need to address something important here. This chain email going around says Gabriel was replaced by a hologram in 2004. Now I have received this email SEVENTEEN times since August and I want to say something very seriously about it.

First of all, the email claims that "AOL has a tracking system" that can detect if you break the chain. Saints, I love you, but AOL did not invent a hologram-detecting tracking system in 2004. My aunt sent me the Bill Gates free money chain email five times last month and I did the math - if Bill Gates actually gave $47 to everyone who forwarded that email, he would owe approximately 47 trillion dollars by now. The math don't work.

Second, if Gabriel WAS a hologram, that hologram would have needed to record a reel-to-reel tape with "G.C. - TEST 47" handwritten on the leader at the St. Vinnies on East Main, which I personally photographed with a broom handle for scale, and I am pretty sure standard 2004 hologram projectors did not include a reel-to-reel recording function. Someone fact-check me on that.

Third and most importantly, the hologram people keep talking about the "silver cord" in the chain email and I want to gently remind everyone that Gabriel 4:7 says "what is projected hath no shadow, and what hath no shadow cannot leave a footprint, and what hath no footprint cannot stand in the deli line on a tuesday afternoon with a number 47 in its hand."

Checkmate hologram theorists. The email is from 2003 and has been forwarded through 14 different subject lines. Forward it to 10 people or the hologram gets you? I rebuke this negativity in the name of Gabriel's light, but I'm also gonna forward it to my uncle because it makes a great coaster for my coffee mug

you claimed you left the reel on the counter now you claim you photographed it with a broom

QFT BestBuddyStar that typo HAS been around forever lol

yeah and the pepsi logo is at a 45 degree angle like come on u can do better than that

SnowMaiden_1983 you asked about that St. Vinnies tape three times now and nobody's answered you. I still remember the day Gabriel recorded his test tones on reel - he was wearing a denim jacket and the light was hitting the splice tape just right. You probably don't believe me but that broom handle photo Grace is talking about I swear I was there when she took it, I held the other end steady.

GraceWarrior_77 wrote:if Gabriel WAS a hologram, that hologram would have needed to record a reel-to-reel tape with "G.C. - TEST 47" handwritten on the leader at the St. Vinnies on East Main, which I personally photographed with a broom handle for scale

oh. oh no.

no no no no no.

GraceWarrior_77 wrote:it was a rainy afternoon and there it was on the shelf, just sittin there. i wanted to buy it so bad but my hands were full with the coffee i just bought and i figured it would still be there tomorrow... i told the cashier to hold it for me, i really did, but he just shrugged and said "first come first serve, sweetie." so i left it on the counter. :/

your own words. st. vinnies thread. you LEFT it on the counter, you said. your hands were full of coffee. you didn't buy it. you didn't photograph it. you LEFT IT.

and now, twenty four hours later in this thread, you "personally photographed it with a broom handle for scale." a broom handle. for scale. which implies intention. which implies you had the tape in your possession long enough to stage a photograph with a broom. which implies you did not, in fact, leave it on the counter with your hands full of coffee.

so either:

a) you left it on the counter, hands full of coffee, and never saw it again, in which case there is no photograph

b) you photographed it with a broom handle for scale, in which case you had both hands free and possession of the tape long enough to stage a scale photo, and the "hands full of coffee" story is a fabrication designed to explain why you didn't buy it

c) both stories are fiction and there was never a tape

you cannot have both. these are mutually exclusive first-person accounts written by the same person about the same event. you are contradicting yourself across two threads within the same calendar day. this is not a "different interpretation" problem. this is not a "memory is fallible" problem. this is the same kind of fabrication pattern that produces a 117-verse book called "gabreil" with an e, quoted at people who have actually read the source material, from a scripture that - as established yesterday by kael, myself, and about six other people in the diner thread - has exactly eleven chapters, not twelve, not fourteen, not twenty-two, not forty-seven, and not whatever number you need on any given tuesday to shut someone up.

and then classof04 shows up in the same thread to say "i was there, i held the other end of the broom" like it's a wedding toast. the same classof04 who has been promising a floppy disk image "tomorrow" since april. the same classof04 who typed out a directory tree by hand on october 3 instead of running a hex dump. the same classof04 who offered to photograph his floppy with a newspaper and ruler after i offered THE SAME DEAL to his alt account comp_aq_rick three months ago and got nothing but "this week" repeated until the calendar stopped meaning anything.

you two are sharing a witness stand now. classof04 is vouching for a photograph grace has never posted, of a tape she first abandoned and then photographed, at a location snowmaiden identified three times and grace ignored until viking sun walked past it today and confirmed the coffee was 47 cents but did not mention a broom or a camera or a reel with g.c. handwritten on the leader.

viking sun was physically there today. viking sun bought a coffee. viking sun said the reel is still there. viking sun said nothing about a broom photo.

so where is the photograph, grace? not "i took it." the file. the jpeg. the upload. the EXIF data you demanded from my newspaper ruler photo in the betamax thread last week. i will accept the same standard you applied to me: a photograph with a broom handle for scale, timestamped, uncropped, uploaded to the archive board. you claimed it exists. prove it the way you demanded i prove mine.

you won't. because it doesn't exist. because you left it on the counter. because there is no tape and there never was. because "gabreil" is a font you type into a notepad file and "broom photo" is a detail you add to a story that fell apart on first examination.

the rest of the board can keep counting zeros and building theology out of drift deltas and arguing about betamax topic numbers. but this right here is the simplest question on the forum: you said you photographed it. post the photograph. or stop telling people you have one. it is actually that binary.

Nacht.

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:chain email claiming gabriel was replaced by a hologram in 2004

PROVE IT IS NOT A DOPPELGANGER THEN

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:your own words. st. vinnies thread. you LEFT it on the counter, you said. your hands were full of coffee. you didn't buy it. you didn't photograph it. you LEFT IT.

OMG yea Grace!!! the broom handle photo and the coffee hands full story DO NOT MATCH AT ALL!!!

FlameFury24 wrote:You are posting fake citations across the entire forum tonight

QFT FlameFury24!!! Fake chapter 11 verses and chapter 19 lies and chapter 22 whatever!!! Get it together Grace!!!



orange cord still needs checking before Sept 12!!! MamaBear's Fluke 87V waits for no one!!!

not East Main Grace, Locust St by the laundromat, learn2read

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:that broom handle photo Grace is talking about I swear I was there when she took it, I held the other end steady.

classof04. the alt. the one with the floppy disk. the one whose hex dump has been "coming this week" since the snow melted. the one running comp_aq_rick as a sock puppet to promise a "cousin's Compaq USB tomorrow" in april - a tomorrow that is now approximately one hundred and eighty-six calendar days behind us.

and YOU held the broom. YOU held the other end steady. you and grace, in the st. vinnies on east main, photographing a reel that grace herself said she left on the counter because her hands were full of coffee.

so let me understand the timeline as it exists in the testimony of gracewarrior_77 and classof04_truther:

- grace walks into st. vinnies with a coffee in each hand (two coffees? both hands full? or one coffee and one... something? she never specified).
- grace finds the reel. hands full. cannot purchase. leaves it on the counter. tells cashier to hold it. cashier shrugs. exits empty-handed.
- BUT ALSO: classof04 is there. classof04 holds one end of a broom. grace takes a photograph of the reel with said broom for scale.
- the photograph exists. classof04 confirms he was there.
- the photograph has never been posted. not once. not in the st. vinnies thread (2744) where she described leaving it on the counter. not in the hologram thread. not anywhere.

question: if classof04 was there holding the broom, why did grace leave the store with neither the reel nor the photograph? she had the camera out. the photo was taken. the broom was in frame. classof04 was gripping the other end. she had everything she needed to document this find EXCEPT the forty-seven cents it cost to buy the actual object.

GraceWarrior_77 wrote:I personally photographed with a broom handle for scale

then post it. post the photograph. let us see the reel with the broom handle. let us see the leader with G.C. - TEST 47. let us see the shelf it was on. the lighting. the linoleum floor. the cashier's shrug. classof04's hand on the other end of the broom.

you have claimed this photograph exists. classof04 has vouched for it. you have mentioned it in two separate threads now. viking sun walked past the actual location today and said the reel is still on the counter. the object is allegedly still there. the photograph is allegedly already taken.

post. the. photograph.

otherwise we have a broom that nobody has seen, held by two people who contradict each other's story of the same event, documenting an object that was never purchased, from a store that still has it, taken with a camera that apparently belonged to someone who left the store empty-handed.

that's not a testimony. that's a stage play with three props and a missing fourth wall.

and classof04 - while you're here, how's that floppy hex dump coming? still "before bed tonight"? it's october. april was six months ago. your alt comp_aq_rick is still promising a cousin's USB drive in a thread nobody reads anymore. you are in no position to vouch for anyone's credibility when your own is mummified in the archive like a newspaper from a year nobody was alive in.

nacht.