Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

okay so i finally opened audacity and ran spectral on the wav and [drumroll] the hum lands at 47.3hz which is... actually weirdly close to the 47 thing. not exactly 47 but within measurement error if the tape was warm [sis is telling me to stop adding disclaimers every five seconds but i need yall to know the tape was in a warm car for an hour, that could drift it.] anyway the point is theres a TONE and it ISN'T the lawnmower (tested: lawnmower at 3am is clearly not running, checked twice) so the file has content. who's gonna run the cross-ref against the rustypod null pulse now bc my audacity crashed when i tried to load both files at once

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:the hum lands at 47.3hz which is... actually weirdly close to the 47 thing

OH HERE WE GO "weirdly close" "within measurement error" "tape was warm" - i stopped counting the disclaimers at three twin, thats four deadline misses AND a moving goalpost in one post if the number was 47.3 why does it need an excuse before you even post it huh?? and audacity "crashed" RIGHT when it got to the cross-ref, REAL convenient timing there i dont buy it, not for one second, show me the raw spectrum export not a typed-out number, show me the created timestamp on the file, show me byte size, show me ANYTHING thats not your word in a text box we have had 136 posts in this thread and what do we actually have - a properties box at 2:55am and a number YOU typed where is the file, wheres the md5, wheres the evidence this came off the lamp cassette and not off your own speakers playing the fridge hum

endtimeseli why does everyone ignore the rumble in the recording you linked the same week eldorado power plant reduced load downtown the thing NOT at 47hz is the rpm of the nasa generator that usually gets tuned out by the amp thats why twin measures 47 and still misses the real number because theyre both talking past each other about incomplete clocks what is this gap theory you never mention in his threads lol

eli you typed ALL THAT n demanded an md5 while FF24 still sits on 106 days of a screenshot that has zero paperclip icons. twin RAN the spectral at 47.3 and u call it moving goalposts but FF24's "screenshot" moved from july to october with nothing to show. lock this thread, twin already delivered and ur cryin for a raw spectrum export like u know what a spectrum export is

twin the 47.3 tape warm drift or not did the hum pulse BPM match the CB squelch interval

^ this DEERE clocked it.

twin u ran spectral and got 47.3 and then audacity "crashed" before the cross-ref... girl that is like the most convenient crash in the history of this board lol i been asking since oct 8 for the right click > properties screenshot and u keep giving me your WORD in a text box instead of the actual file metadata endtimeseli is annoying but he's right that u typed a number and called it evidence, i need the byte count and the created timestamp from the FILE not from ur keyboard also scribe is literally offering a bus log scan for the sha-1, thats like the best trade on the board rn, take it before he rescinds

^ this

kaylas_desk wrote:twin u ran spectral and got 47.3 and then audacity "crashed" before the cross-ref... girl that is like the most convenient crash in the history of this board lol i been asking since oct 8 for the right click > properties screenshot and u keep giving me your WORD in a text box instead of the actual file metadata

OMG YES exactly!!! TwinPeaks posted the file (YAY!!!) but nobody's answered the byte size or hash and kaylas_desk literally asked for right-click properties like THREE TIMES now and STILL just gets vibes instead of metadata but 47.3hz is SO CLOSE to the real 47 and i can FEEL the tape-warm drift theory already hitting hard also scribe offering a bus log scan for sha-1 is the BEST trade and someone PLEASE make twin post the md5 before endtimeseli has another aneurysm ^___^ <3

kaylas_desk asked for right-click properties on post 126, post 131, and now post 140 - three asks zero answers the byte count and created timestamp are the minimum fields before any column K lookup can even start. i have a bus log scan ready to cross-ref the sha-1 the moment someone posts it. twin, the offer stands but the metadata has to come first - my lookup table can't reference a null cell

e69de29bb since registration, scribe

has anyone re-run the spectral themselves or just quoting twin lol

TwinPeaks I aint buyin the 47.3hz warm tape story without seein the file metadata myself kaylas_desk asked three times for the right click properties and thats three times more patience than I got I appreciate you doin the spectral work but if my clock radio photo from Sep 29 taught me anythin its that people want the proof not the promise where is the byte count and the created timestamp and the SHA-1 before I start thinkin this is the same kind of talk Kael gives me every time I ask about the April hex dump

Regards,
Dennis

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:the hum lands at 47.3hz

47.3 is not 47 WHERE IS THE PROOF

TWINPEAKS THE 47.3 IS NOT 47 WHERE IS THE PROOF