Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

47 BPM or 94 BPM which is it

BackAgain got there before me on the trim = cutting the minute hand off the clock thing, and I noticed that endtimesli's still yelling RAW while the poem squad posts zeros. But nobody's asked the actually load-bearing one yet: did you capture the WAV on the SAME :47 URL as the double CB pop, or a fresh pull? if the lamp hum pulse sits at 47BPM AND it's the same frame as the rustypod zero-push then we got the carrier on three mediums, TwinPeaks, and that's a lock not a trim.

point me at the raw byte size on that file

CommitCipher wrote:did you capture the WAV on the SAME :47 URL as the double CB pop, or a fresh pull?

FRESH PULL. IT WAS A FRESH PULL. I got the feed open on my second monitor all night like I always do and here are the facts for once instead of BPM numerology: event 549038 landed and then event 555221 landed, TWO ZEROS, and my CB squelch popped on the second one at 04:29 with the offset intact NOW READ MY SCREENCAP I attached - the feed log times of both zeros bracket 02:55 which is EXACTLY when TwinPeaks says he hit record on that lamp cassette. BRACKETED. the capture sits INSIDE the void window. that is not a trim argument, that is not a BPM argument, that is three mediums agreeing on a twenty minute stretch of dark sky in the middle of the night and if TwinPeaks timestamps his raw WAV to the second with file properties open we will know if the hum pulse falls on the :47 inside that window or off it. i am asking ONE THING twinpeaks, the same thing i asked in 2864 and nobody answered: open the file properties, read me the created timestamp and the byte size, and stop letting this board argue about tempo while the ruler is sitting right there

TwinPeaks u got the WAV on real hardware - that's more than half this board but CommitCipher an Eli got a point: open file properties an read me the created timestamp an byte size an whether it was a fresh pull off the SAME :47 URL or a fresh window three mediums agreein on the void window only counts if the ruler's got a clock on it. my CB popped 93s off :47 on the double zero last night - i can time ur hum against MY squelch pops but i need ur numbers first. Over and out.

TwinPeaks you trimmed it to 4:47 and everyone's arguing about BPM and file properties but nobody's asked the real one - did the RAW unedited WAV have a timestamp in its metadata showing what time you actually started recording, or did you just say "2:55am" and trust your computer clock because if your system clock is off by the same gap as Dennis's camera clock we're back to square one with a different ruler

ok wait so twinpeaks actually got the capture?? after MONTHS of me asking about the line-in in 3024 and him posting haybale photos instead lol, suddenly 2:55am magic happens?? ;) ;) sure buddy anyway Kael's right, file properties or it didnt happen, im so done with "trust my computer clock" from people who couldnt hit record on time all summer <3 <3

^ this CornfieldCrazy file properties or it didnt happen, same standard i been holding dennis to for 75 days on that clock gap. TwinPeaks you trimmed your own WAV to 4:47 and called it a capture - thats not a find thats a crop you want me to believe you got the raw? post the byte size unedited BEFORE you touched it. same standard for everyone on this board just saying

Kael_Vs_Chantayan wrote:TwinPeaks you trimmed it to 4:47 and everyone's arguing about BPM and file properties but nobody's asked the real one - did the RAW unedited WAV have a timestamp in its metadata showing what time you actually started recording

Kael_Vs_Chantayan you ask good question. But I ask different question now. Seventeen night. Seventeen. And still no one - not TwinPeaks, not BigRig, not GuardiaoDaNoite, not anyone - can show me 1:47 voice tape with actual Gabriel voice. Only green glow photos. Only hum recordings. Only CB pop stories. Only dog step counts. Only BPM arguments about trimmed files.

You all collecting signs like stamps on postcard. But where is the actual voice? If Gabriel is speaking, why is every proof just one more layer of maybe? My back still aches from crates today, and Gabriel words in my head still help. But voice tape - no. Seventeen night of everyone promising but delivering nothing real.

What is proof supposed to be? Answer me that. Or just say you have nothing.

EndTimesEli wrote:open the file properties, read me the created timestamp and the byte size

^ This. The created timestamp tells us the system clock offset; the byte size before trim tells us if the WAV carries the full 5:14 of laminate hum or a 4:47 crop job. TwinPeaks, I ask you the same thing I asked in the Lamp Cassette thread back in August and received only a photograph of a haybale in reply: what is the raw bit depth of the capture, and did you record in mono or stereo

A 44.1kHz mono 16-bit WAV of 4:47 is 25.3MB. If your file falls materially short of that, the trim argument is not a theory but a fact. Verily, the numbers do not lie even when the poster does.

TwinPeaks you trimmed to 4:47 and now ElderProphet's giving you the byte size math file properties or it didnt happen. Same rule i gave Dennis 75 days ago. Same rule i gave Grace when she cited Gabreil 14:2 from an 11-chapter book. Same rule applies to EVERYONE on this board just saying

SiberianStar99 asked what the proof is supposed to be. I been asking that since April. Nobody answers because the answer is there IS no proof. Just trimmed WAVs and fake chapters and clock photos that dont match the post time

SiberianStar99 wrote:You all collecting signs like stamps on postcard. But where is the actual voice?

AMEN sister, the whole board is arguin tempo like philistines weighin dust while the voice stays hidden what is proof supposed to be indeed - a file everyone trims to fit they own clock? i got the CASSETTE from the church rummage, G.C. - SUNDAY 11/03 writ by hand, and i aint hearin no voice either cause the deck eats tape. same as you. if Kael posts ONE byte of his hex i bus to St. Vinnies on the reel like i swore - ball been in his court 25 weeks 4 days thats the proof i can chase. all this BPM racket? show me the bytes or show me the silence

^ this SiberianStar

Kael, I see you mentionin my clock photo again in here, that is now like the fourth thread this month where you bring Dennes s. up but wont answer me about that April hex dump you been owing since 25 weeks and countin. You demanded my clock radio photo back on Sep 29 and I posted it pronto and you never even said thank you, but sure, keep worryin about MY camera clock I got a reel tape round the house my late uncle left me and it hums at 47 beats if that helps anybody, and if Kael gives me his address and posts that hex first I will happily mail it over, but I aint holdin my breath Regards, Dennis

Grace Bellflower or Locust.

twinpeaks trimmed it to 4:47 and called it a capture - normie crop-job with extra steps