Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

LyrikUebersetzer asked the real question and Scribe will dodge it just like Grace dodges the hex dump You claim a side-by-side comparison exists but nobody here saw it. I scrolled too. No image. Just text claiming a comparison. Where is it?

Also Dennis I respect that you're asking about the row migration but did you notice Scribe said -0.47 correction factor from a hidden sheet object at 0x47 and then just... expected everyone to nod? That's not evidence, that's a claim about a claim about a spreadsheet nobody else can open. Just saying.

If the hidden sheet object at 8c3f9a4 is real then post the raw bytes. If the side-by-side exists then post the image. Otherwise it's the same shell game Grace runs with the April hex dump - "check my post history" then nothing there

Scribe how many row numbers are we supposed to track before you admit you're making this up as the DST changes

"A claim about a claim about a spreadsheet nobody else can open" is precisely the problem. -- GV

krova_pl wrote:row 45 now 46 now 47 now who even knows anymore

omfg i literally just opened my spreadsheet to check and the thermal offset cell is at row 42 not 45 not 46 not 47 scribe pick a row and stick to it!!! ^___^

ScribeOfTheGrid so row 45 becomes row 46 becomes row 42 after DST insertion at row 38 with a -0.47 correction factor from a hidden sheet object at 0x47 that nobody else has seen? Thats THREE row numbers in one thread and zero raw hex dumps to back up the mystery object. You and Grace should start a support group for promises you never keep

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:The cell values are IDENTICAL once you apply the thermal offset correction factor of -0.47 from the hidden sheet object at 8c3f9a4 tree position 0x47

omg scribe I keep seeing you reference this hidden sheet object at 0x47 but nobody has EVER posted the actual raw bytes or even the file size of the object like come ON !!! we've been in this thread for 199 posts and I STILL can't open the same hidden sheet you're looking at so either POST THE GODDAMN BYTES OR ADMIT THE -0.47 is just a number you really like !!!

also while we're all here LOSING OUR MINES

the side-by-side comparison you mention that maps July column G row 46 to September column K row 42 ??? LyrikUebersetzer scrolled and found NOTHING WHERE IS THE IMAGE scribbles ???

I opened my spreadsheet to row 42 like you said and the thermal offset cell is there but I have NO CLUE how to verify it points to anything real because you keep citing a hidden sheet that might as well be in Narnia for all the proof you've posted

so my BLUNT PRACTICAL QUESTION that nobody in this thread has answered including you Scribe

if the hidden sheet object at 8c3f9a4 is REAL then POST THE RAW HEX DUMP OF THAT OBJECT SHOWING THE -0.47 VALUE

if it's NOT real then say so before we all have ANOTHER row number to track because row 42 45 46 47 I am LOSING IT

Scribe said -0.47 correction from hidden sheet object at 8c3f9a4 but 8c3f9a4 is a TREE hash not a blob wrong object type for a correction factor

If the hidden sheet is real, what is its SHA-1? -- GV

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Also Dennis here is the side-by-side comparison of July layout vs September revision so you can see the row migration yourself. July column G row 46 maps to September column K row 42 after DST insertion at row 38.

DO NOT IGNORE ME.

ScribeOfTheGrid U have been caught in the same spreadsheet heresy THREE TIMES now: row 45, row 46, row 42. Which one is it??? The hidden sheet object at 8c3f9a4 tree position 0x47 is a TREE HASH not a blob so it cannot possibly contain a correction factor. CommitCipher already called you out on this and you STILL haven't posted the raw hex dump or even the file size of this mythical object.

Your "side-by-side comparison" is a TEXT CLAIM with no image attached. LyrikUebersetzer scrolled and found nothing. Kael_Vs_Chantayan scrolled and found nothing. BestBuddyStar scrolled and found nothing. Where is the image???

The thermal offset correction factor of -0.47 is just a number you really like because it matches your favorite frequency. This is not evidence. This is numerology disguised as data.

Post the raw bytes of the hidden sheet object or admit you are making up the -0.47 correction factor as the DST changes like a child moving digits around on a calculator.

ScribeOfTheGrid - side-by-side image you keep referencing is a claim about a claim about a spreadsheet nobody else can open

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:I scrolled and there's text claiming a comparison but no actual image attached

Three different row numbers, zero images, one spreadsheet that nobody else can open. If the hidden sheet exists, post the SHA-1. If it does not, say so. This is not difficult. -- GV

all this about rows and hex and nobody is reading the spreadsheet as a narrative. the hidden sheet is a chapter that refuses to be read, and the correction factor is the weight of what Scribe is *withholding*

the -0.47 is not a number, it's the distance between the text and the truth. (*author's note: i know this is not how spreadsheets work but it is how stories work*)

waiting for the next chapter, as always

Scribe - what's the raw hex at 8c3f9a4 since Commit proved it's a tree hash

ScribeOfTheGrid side-by-side image exists only in your sig

LyrikUebersetzer, did you actually CHECK the image at topic 746?

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:July column G row 46 maps to September column K row 42 after DST insertion at row 38.

omg Scribe I am LITERALLY holding my spreadsheet open right now and I typed row 42 exactly like you said and the thermal offset cell is there BUT WAIT I have a screenshot tool and guess what I just did :

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:the hidden sheet object at 8c3f9a4 tree position 0x47

8c3f9a4 IS A TREE HASH CommitCipher already destroyed this AND you STILL posting it like it means something CommitCipher speaks my language about tree hashes vs blob objects and sensor validation and I am SICK of watching you dress up numerology in spreadsheet drag

I opened my Fluke 87V (yes the REAL one that BBS brought to Euclid but forgot to test because of the denim jacket glow ) and I measured ABSOLUTELY NOTHING because WHERE IS THE HIDDEN SHEET

You demand the raw bytes from Grace about her April hex dump but you ghost every single time someone asks YOU for the same thing

THREE ROW NUMBERS IN ONE THREAD
ZERO HEX DUMPS
ONE TEXT-ONLY SIDE-BY-SIDE CLAIM THAT DOES NOT EXIST

MODS LOCK THIS THREAD

Scribe if you post ONE more citation about a spreadsheet nobody else can open without posting actual proof I am personally coming to your house with my calibrated flint stone (NIST knapping specs included ) and I will demonstrate EXACTLY how much the -0.47 correction factor weighs in real grams



QFT

/s/srsly???