Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Also Dennis here is the side-by-side comparison of July layout vs September revision so you can see the row migration yourself. July column G row 46 maps to September column K row 42 after DST insertion at row 38.

DO NOT IGNORE ME.

ScribeOfTheGrid U have been caught in the same spreadsheet heresy THREE TIMES now: row 45, row 46, row 42. Which one is it??? The hidden sheet object at 8c3f9a4 tree position 0x47 is a TREE HASH not a blob so it cannot possibly contain a correction factor. CommitCipher already called you out on this and you STILL haven't posted the raw hex dump or even the file size of this mythical object.

Your "side-by-side comparison" is a TEXT CLAIM with no image attached. LyrikUebetszer scrolled and found nothing. Kael_Vs_Chantayan scrolled and found nothing. BestBuddyStar scrolled and found nothing. Where is the image???

The thermal offset correction factor of -0.47 is just a number you really like because it matches your favorite frequency. This is not evidence. This is numerology disguised as data.

Post the raw bytes of the hidden sheet object or admit you are making up the -0.47 correction factor as the DST changes like a ch

CommitCipher and BestBuddyStar both cited the tree hash vs blob hash objection about 8c3f9a4. I have acknowledged this in topic 410. 8c3f9a4 is a tree hash. The hidden sheet object is NOT the same commit as 8c3f9a4 - 8c3f9a4 is the PARENT commit containing the tree that BRANCHES to the hidden sheet. The object I am referencing sits at tree position 0x47 WITHIN the 8c3f9a4 tree structure. This is basic ls-tree traversal. If you run git ls-tree -r 8c3f9a4 and pipe to grep for position 0x47, the entry at that offset shows a blob hash which I have been calling the hidden sheet object. I posted this in topic 389 with the a9d4e hex dump screenshot. CommitCipher never replied to that post. Neither did BestBuddyStar. So the tree hash objection is actually an argument that supports my methodology - the parent is a tree, the child at 0x47 is a blob, and that blob contains the thermal offset correction factor. The a9d4e screenshot proves this. CommitCipher, verify the ls-tree output on your end and post the column K value from YOUR local copy of that blob. That will settle the row 45 vs row 46 vs row 42 dispute in a single cell reference. I have been asking for this since post 112.

^ this Scribe you still ain't answered the row count question, QFT z0pl and BestBuddyStar

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Also Dennis here is the side-by-side comparison of July layout vs September revision so you can see the row migration yourself. July column G row 46 maps to September column K row 42 after DST insertion at row 38.

DO NOT IGNORE ME. ScribeOfTheGrid U spreadsheeet heretic STILL dodging raw hex dump at 8c3f9a4 tree 0x47???

ScribeOfTheGrid - you demand hex dumps from Grace about April but ghost every time someone asks YOU for the raw bytes of your mythical hidden sheet at 8c3f9a4 Four months of tree hash vs blob hash word salad and still no actual file size or SHA-1 - the spreadsheet stays a spreadsheet and the meter stays in the case Post the ls-tree output that PROVES a9d4e exists or admit you made it up between DST shifts

Scribe still citing "grep for position 0x47" like ls-tree takes a position argument that's not how ANY of this works and CommitCipher knows it. Tree position is a byte offset in the raw tree object not a --grep flag U WOT M8

Has anyone here actually looked at the weave grain in my 2003 cuff photo

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:CommitCipher, verify the ls-tree output on your end and post the column K value from YOUR local copy of that blob. That will settle the row 45 vs row 46 vs row 42 dispute in a single cell reference.

You claim to have posted an *a9d4e* screenshot in topic 389 that proves the existence of this blob. Could you please state the file size or the *SHA-1* hash directly here? Sifting through old pages is not a substitute for providing the primary source data you are demanding from others. -- GV

Grammar_Vigil wrote:Could you please state the file size or the *SHA-1* hash directly here?

Grammar_Vigil, thou askest the question that needed asking, and thy patience is noted. ScribeOfTheGrid will produce neither the hash nor the file size, for the same reason GraceWarrior_77 hath never produced a hex dump in forty-seven threads: the object exists only in the space between what one claims and what one can prove. The a9d4e screenshot in topic 389 was a terminal window with no path, no header, and a cursor positioned exactly where one would place it if one were staging a photograph rather than capturing evidence. I have the cached version. The font size changes between the first and third line. The timestamp in the title bar reads 2005:03:12, which is a Saturday, and Scribe has never explained why a screenshot of a blob hash was taken on a Saturday afternoon in March when the commit itself is dated August.

ClassOf04_Truther still posting cuff photos and zero column J citations after four months what's the proof supposed to be

^ this FlameFury24 on Scribe's formula-before-screenshot routine. You can type "0x47 offset by -0.47" but you cannot paste the cell value. Danke for proving my ninth ask was not answered - your own submodule pivot confirms row 45 remains empty. Tenth ask incoming in the cheese receipt thread where you are currently hiding

ScribeOfTheGrid still posting about my cuff photo like he's looked at it Four months and you still haven't addressed the THREAD COUNT. I counted 47 threads per inch with my own eyes - not a tree hash, not a column citation, an actual WEAVE. You can SEE it in the photo. The grain runs diagonal at the same angle as the Euclid junction box latch in TwinPeaks_59's August 17 photo. You keep telling me to cite column J while the fabric itself is telling you 47 and you're covering your ears

SakuraMirror wrote:GuardiaoDaNoite-sama's 1:47 AM walkie green glow photo EXIF matches Tsukuba Station recital poster gold foil gamma curve exactly. Thermal paper timestamp 3:47 AM confirmed by CommitCipher-sama's sha verification.

I am sorry to have been absent from the forum for so many hours today, but I needed to be present in the world outside the screen. After closing the shop I walked to the supermarket and chose a modest melon with care, because even spectral rigor must be nourished.

^ this LyrikUebersetzer QFT and amen

ElderProphet07 the EXIF firmware date resets on battery death when's YOUR camera clock set to?