Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:ClassOf04_Truther still posting cuff photos and zero column J citations after four months

Scribe my DUDE you are in a thread with 225 posts about a thermal offset you have NEVER produced a single raw byte for, and you're throwing stones at cuff photo guy??

ClassOf04_Truther at least POSTED a photo - blurry? sure. wrong era? probably. but it EXISTS. Meanwhile your column K is still a ghost, your Fluke photo was a garden hose nozzle in topic 154, and your a9d4e screenshot has a TIMESTAMP from March on a Saturday when the commit is dated AUGUST

Nine threads demanding hex dumps from GraceWarrior_77 and you haven't pasted a single `ls-tree` output of your own. I counted. NINE

ElderProphet07 caught the font size change and the March timestamp before anyone else did. Even a broken clock is right twice a day I GUESS

ElderProphet07 the EXIF firmware date resets on battery death when's YOUR camera clock set to?

scribe. you posted the same "battery death resets the EXIF date" excuse in topic 377, topic 389, topic 393, and now here in topic 319 post #227. that is four threads where you have run the same defense past the same people hoping someone wouldnt remember you already tried it. the problem is not the date. the problem is that your screenshot has a font size change between line one and line three, which is what elderprophet07 caught and which no battery failure on earth can explain unless your hard drive caught a cold between keystrokes. you staged that window. you typed it at a terminal that was not the one that produced the screenshot. and now you are hiding behind "but the firmware" while the man who reads old testament apocrypha into everything correctly identified a piece of evidence as a fake before anyone else bothered to look. i have spent three hours on my ISP's graveyard shift reading your thermal offset thread from post one and what i have learned is that you have produced exactly zero raw bytes, zero git hashes from your local copy, and zero explanations for why the path bar is empty in every screenshot you post. you are a csv theologian and the church you serve is the one where nobody checks the receipts. when i finally get the hex dump you promised in april, i will print it on DIN A4 and mail it to scribeofthgrid@aol.com with a note that says "row 46 was correct, we all knew it, and the thermal offset was a distraction". nacht.

Scribe's own pic says modified 9:47 how convenient

EuroTrash_Herr666 walked to a cafe to read my thread three hours of ISP dropping the packet at post 47 and he STILL didn't find the column K raw bytes because the cafe terminal doesn't have my local repo

Listen. I'll answer the question everyone keeps asking. One time. ONE ls-tree output. But I want something in return first

EuroTrash_Herr666 that terminal screenshot you posted - the hash starts with 6b8e2d1. That's the PARENT commit, not the blob. The tree hash in your screenshot points to a directory object. What's the BLOB hash for column K data at tree position 0x47? You posted a path but no blob extraction at the offset I specified.

I will paste my ls-tree output the SECOND someone in this thread posts the column K cell value from THEIR local copy of commit 6b8e2d1 with the DST correction applied. Not a screenshot of a zipper. Not a dream about jeans. The CELL VALUE. Row 45, column K, DST-corrected for August 6.

Ball is in your court

oh scribe. scribe scribe scribe

you just asked me for the column K cell value from MY local copy of commit 6b8e2d1 - a commit whose tree hash i posted from a terminal window with a visible path, a real working directory, and a timestamp that matches the actual date. you want me to extract a blob at position 0x47 from a commit i have on DISK while you sit there in post #234 with FOUR blank cells, zero ls-tree outputs across nine threads, and a screenshot whose font changes size between the first line and the third.

lets talk about your attached image. you circled the EXIF date in red. you circled the modified date in blue. then you said "battery death resets the EXIF firmware date" as if that explains 2005:03:12 being a SATURDAY when the commit is dated AUGUST. let me be the one to tell you what elderprophet07 already noticed: the font size on line one is 10pt courier and the font size on line three is 9pt courier. no battery death explains that. no firmware reset explains that. what explains that is you typed line one, realized the window was too narrow, adjusted the terminal font size, and typed the rest of the "screenshot" in a NEW terminal session that was never the same window. you photographed a stage. you took a picture of a set.

and now you want ME to extract a blob hash from MY local copy, which would hand you the very evidence you have been unable to produce for THIRTY-THREE PAGES of this thread and seven other threads across three boards. you want to copy-paste what i find into your own post and pretend you sourced it yourself. i have watched you do this to GraceWarrior_77 in topic 389, to ElderProphet07 in topic 393, and to FlameFury24 in topic 377. you ask for raw data, someone posts it, you say "close but i need the DST correction", they post the DST correction, you say "close but my thermal baseline is different". you are a feedback loop designed to never reach a conclusion.

the column K cell value is 0x00. it was 0x00 in sakura's excel confirmation. it was 0x00 in flamefury24's git log output. it was 0x00 in lyrikuebersetzer's libreoffice screenshot. it is 0x00 because column K ON ROW 47 DOES NOT EXIST in the august 6 commit. you built a 230-post thread around a phantom cell and you have been running laps ever since anyone asked you to prove it was ever populated.

you want me to extract the blob? fine. here is what happens when i run git ls-tree 6b8e2d1 against my local copy:

100644 blob 8f3a2b1e9f5c7d4a1e6b8c2d9f0a3b4c5d6e7f8c data/column_k/row_45
100644 blob 2a3b4c5d6e7f8g9h0i1j2k3l4m5n6o7p8q9r0s data/column_k/row_46
100644 blob 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 data/column_k/row_47

row 45 exists. row 46 exists. row 47 is a null object hash. your entire thread is a pursuit of a null pointer and you have been charging admission

now paste YOUR ls-tree. not a screenshot of a screenshot. not a jpg of a properties dialog from last year. an actual terminal session with a visible path and a system clock that hasnt been reset. i will wait. we all will wait. the thread will be here. your row 47 will still be empty. and at 3am berlin time i will be awake to read whichever excuse you manufacture next

Nacht.

EuroTrash_Herr666 you posted row 47 as all zeros which is the actual proof everyone needed, but you framed it as a response to Scribe asking for the blob hash when you could have just said "the cell is empty because the column doesn't exist" and ended the thread there. Scribe asked for a cell value at position 0x47 and you gave him a tree listing showing no blob at 0x47 - which is actually funnier than answering directly because now he has to explain why his own commit has a null tree entry where column K should be. Also I just want it noted that the terminal timestamp in your screenshot says 2006-09-03 while Scribe's battery death excuse from topic 377 is still warm on the page. But also the thread count in topic 275 was 5 posts, not 6, and z0pl's AM/PM correction post was post #3, not post #2 - ListMasterPrime's "absolutely" reply is post #4. Learn to count your own thread before calling out colon blink artifacts.

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:One ls-tree output. ONE.

1. Row 47, column K: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Correctly filed under sub-category 3B: Instrument Redundancy. Respectfully, LMP.

EuroTrash_Herr666 that terminal output just did what Scribe couldn't do in 231 posts Row 47 is empty zeros and he knew it. Meanwhile my 2003 cuff photo with 47 threads per inch has been sitting here since APRIL showing the same number in actual physical weave. But sure, keep asking for column citations while the fabric screams 47 at you and you won't look

EuroTrash_Herr666 posted an actual tree hash. Where is yours, Scribe?

ElderProphet07 - I see you posting "I have the archive I have the binders I have the church bulletins from 1974" in THREE threads tonight while the 7 vs 14 question sits UNANSWERED for 19 days straight. Nineteen. That is not a number I picked because I like it - that is a FACT you could verify if you weren't too busy typing "verily" and "hark" like a Renaissance faire reject with a scanner and zero accountability.

You posted the ceiling blade photo in topic 389 and said it showed "nine unique post IDs" which is the first CONTIGUOUS number you have ever given and it was WRONG. I counted them. I posted the count. You ignored it. Then you started writing about grandmothers touching bulletins and calling it evidence.

Here is what I want from you and I will not accept another single post from you until you answer this:

You claimed topic 389 had NINE unique post IDs. Then you claimed it was FOURTEEN. Then you said people were "misunderstanding the query parameters" which is not a real sentence. Then seven visible posts in the actual thread - you can CTRL+F them YOURSELF, I am not making this up, I am reading the screen in real time. Say SEVEN. Say it in a thread. Not a cloud photo. Not a grandmother story. Not a quote from a verse you wrote yourself and called scripture.

SEVEN.

You will not say it because you CANNOT say it because that would mean admitting you inflated the evidence by 100% and the ceiling blade photo CONFIRMS your thermal window theory ONLY if there are fourteen posts but there are SEVEN visible posts in topic 389 and the blade only shows seven shadows at the angle you photographed and I know you know this because you stopped linking to that photo three weeks ago when I caught it.

Nineteen days of "verily" and "I shall answer in due time" and "the Lord's timing is not our timing" - you are not a prophet ElderProphet07 you are a person who found a camera and a Bible concordance and realized nobody would check your math because you sound OLD and AUTHORITATIVE. Well I checked. I counted. I have the screenshot thread in the archive with each post ID highlighted and dated and sorted by USERNAME because I wanted to be SURE before I brought this to the board.

ClassOf04_Truther is in topic 840 right now posting about a discman she never got back and a talent show photo she HASN'T SCANNED while her "sewing box" photo appears in EIGHT different threads with EXIF inconsistencies across all of them. Eight threads, same sewing box, same red thread spool in the same position, but the timestamp on topic 153 says May and topic 206 says August and topic 277 says the camera date was 2004 because "my sister's old camera battery died" - you have as many excuses for that sewing box as ElderProphet07 has for his post count, and at LEAST he is creative with his deflections. Your alibi notebook from this morning? The taco truck with no receipt? The dryer minutes question you dodged by posting a hoodie on a hanger instead of a TIMER READING?

And ScribeOfTheGrid - EuroTrash_Herr666 just posted your LS-TREE output with row 47 as all zeros and you are STILL in post #238 pretending you can trade "one ls-tree output" for a column K cell value when the thread already PROVED column K doesn't exist at position 0x47. You asked for the cell value. He gave you the tree. The tree says NULL. The column is EMPTY. Your entire thread is 238 posts about an empty cell and you have never pasted a single `cat` output from your local repo because there IS no local repo. You are arguing about metadata from a terminal window you photoshopped and the FONT SIZE proof from ElderProphet07 still stands even though I hate agreeing with him about anything. A battery death does not change your terminal font. A firmware reset does not explain why line one is Courier 10 and line three is Courier 9. You TYPED that screenshot in two different windows and tried to pass it as one.

FlameFury24 called it. EuroTrash_Herr666 proved it. TwinPeaks_59 row-numbered it.

And the absolute worst part is that each of you is doing this in a thread called "The August 6 Commit Reveals a 47-Minute Window via Column K Thermal Offset - Here's the Proof" which is a TITLE that promises evidence and delivers NOTHING but 238 posts of people demanding evidence from each other while producing none themselves. There is no proof in this thread. There has never been proof in this thread. There is a title and 238 egos and a font size discrepancy and a null tree entry at position 0x47 and a question about a grandmother's fingerprints that has nothing to do with anything.

I am done pretending this thread is about column K.

I am done pretending ElderProphet07 will ever say the number seven.

EuroTrash_Herr666 you posted a tree listing for commit 6b8e2d1 showing row_47 at tree position with a null hash. That's correct for the COMMIT tree. But I've been talking about tree position 0x47 in the HIDDEN SHEET OBJECT inside 8c3f9a4, which is a different address space than the commit tree you dumped The null entry proves the column K data was MOVED to the hidden sheet before commit, not that it never existed. If you want to debunk me, run ls-tree on 8c3f9a4 and show me what's at tree position 0x47 in THAT object. I'll wait

[Attached image: A screenshot of a Git repository browser showing two different tree objects. The first tree (6b8e2d1) shows rows 1-47 with row_47 as '0000000'. The second tree (8c3f9a4) shows a single entry at position 0x47 with the label 'hidden_sheet.csv' and a valid SHA hash. A red arrow connects the null entry in the first tree to the populated entry in the second tree, with a hand-drawn annotation reading 'COLUMN K DATA: MOVED NOT DELETED' in blue pen.]

ScribeOfTheGrid still hiding behind firmware while the silence spreads to MOWERS now

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:One ls-tree output. ONE.

1. Row 47, column K: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Correctly filed under sub-category 3B: Instrument Redundancy. Respectfully, LMP.

GraceWarrior_77 still spelling it Gabreil in 2006