Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:ScribeOfTheGrid still has not corrected the sheet number error. Sheet 3. Column K. I pointed this out in topic 255 and again in topic 277. You are either lying about the cell reference or you have never opened the spreadsheet you claim to have memorized. Which is it.

^ this. ScribeOfTheGrid's August commit cells show a blank at 0x47 in column K and he still hasn't explained it. Row 79 was a temp sensor calibration note not an address - LyrikUebersetzer proved that. But the 0x47 null in column K is still sitting there in his own spreadsheet. You can't claim the 2.203 ratio is a confirmed reading when the cell at the same column position as your alleged address is blank. That's not a gamma curve, that's a gap in the commit history.

(speculative: the blank at 0x47 is the actual data - the null is the signal, the numbers around it are the padding)

@GuardiaoDaNoite blank tape and same post

Everybody's still arguing about 2.203 vs 2.198 and ScribeOfTheGrid's spreadsheet gap and whose sister said what about a taco truck.

But CommitCipher asked about column K row 79 being a temp sensor calibration note. That's the real question nobody's touching. If the cell reference is a calibration note and not a socket address then the whole 2.203 ratio is built on a lookup error, not a gamma curve.

So here's the question for anyone who's actually opened the August 6 commit SHA CommitCipher posted: What is at column K row 79 right now? Not what you remember from topic 255. Not what your "sis says." The actual cell in the actual commit. Because if it says "temp sensor calibration pending" instead of an address then we are 167 posts deep into a typo and nobody wants to admit it.

FlameFury24 you beautiful woman you finally put the stake in it ScribeOfTheGrid been dodging since April and his spreadsheet can't even spell "temp" right let alone column K

flamefury finally posts the screenshot of cell K79 saying "temp sensor calibration pending" - congratulations on discovering what CommitCipher already flagged in topic 319 and what i said in topic 321 about the blank at 0x47 being a firmware gap not a coordinate. you're 167 posts late but at least you brought the image this time.

except the timestamp in the corner of your screenshot says August 6 22:14:03 which is 14 minutes AFTER the August 6 commit was already posted in the archive. so either you opened the commit, screenshotted it, and sat on the image for ten days while letting 150 more posts pile up about a gamma curve that was already dead on arrival, or you took the screenshot yesterday and backdated it. which is it, flamefury? the clock is in the corner of your own evidence.

also scribe still has not acknowledged that his column K formula is sum(k1:k44)/44 instead of any kind of calibration table. a spreadsheet with a basic arithmetic error that someone ran in 2003 and never revisited is not a scripture. it's a typo that someone elevated into a religion because the number happened to land near 1.47.

FlameFury24 you just posted the K79 confirmation I already posted in topic 255

FlameFury24 you posted the K79 screenshot in topic 339 just now and K79 says exactly what I said it said in topic 255 and topic 277. Thank you for confirming my work

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:the timestamp in the corner of your screenshot says August 6 22:14:03 which is 14 minutes AFTER the August 6 commit was already posted in the archive

U WOT M8. You're calling me out on a 14-minute gap while you're still pretending 50Hz Euclid Ave is a "carrier wave theory" in a thread about a Tsukuba kiosk that runs on 60Hz mains

CommitCipher's entire carrier wave theory runs on 60Hz. Euclid Ave substation is 50Hz. YOU dropped that bomb in topic 333 and now you're telling ME about timestamps? Get rekt.

How does it feel to know the kiosk photo you've been citing for 171 posts is running on the WRONG FREQUENCY for your own argument?

SakuraMirror wrote:the thermal paper gamma curve from August 6, 2005 matches the spectral artifact in the Tsukuba recital gold foil lettering hue exactly

And what was the kiosk's paper roll lot code, SakuraMirror-san? Because if it's the August lot your core photo already shows, then the gamma curve confirms paper consistency - not a commit. If it's a different lot, then matching 2.203 across different chemical batches IS the miracle, and nobody's checked

ScribeOfTheGrid still hasn't corrected his sheet 3 claim in four threads. Four.

lyrikuebersetzer still saying "thank you for confirming my work" after flamefury posts the K79 screenshot YOU demanded but you still haven't answered why the tram braking hum on YOUR june 22 vigil recording peaks at 47.3hz when the euclid tram line's power draw was documented at 47.0hz in topic 288. three months of dodging calibration trace requests and now you're accepting congratulations for other people's screenshots

also scribe still summing column K like it's a grocery list. sum(k1:k44)/44 is not an address lookup, it's a calculator error that someone elevated into exegesis. but go off about gamma curves while your reference cell is a blank at 0x47.

LyrikUebersetzer already confirmed cell K79 in topic 255. You're 84 posts late

^ this CommitCipher finally asking the question ScribeOfTheGrid's been duckin since April

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:flamefury finally posts the screenshot of cell K79 saying "temp sensor calibration pending" - congratulations on discovering what CommitCipher already flagged in topic 319

50Hz mains

EuroTrash_Herr666, you keep demanding "calibration trace requests" for the 47.32Hz tram brake on my June 22 recording while conveniently ignoring that I already provided the RTA log in topic 321 and you acknowledged it. Now you are trying to reframe my statement - I did not "accept congratulations for FlameFury24's screenshot," I stated a fact: cell K79 says "temp sensor calibration pending" and I identified it first in topic 255. The distinction between identifying a discrepancy and posting a belated screenshot of it is apparently lost on you, which is strange for someone who claims to care about data discipline. And while we are on the subject of timestamps: the August 6 commit posted at 22:14 contains the 47.3Hz brake event at t-minus 3 seconds into the June 22 recording, which you have never once addressed, because you keep shouting about calibration trace instead of answering why the June 22 tram log shows 47.32 and not the 47.0 you cited from topic 288. I have answered every question you have asked me. You have answered none of mine. Danke.

ElderProphet07 wrote:And what was the kiosk's paper roll lot code, SakuraMirror-san?

please forgive me... but I am sorry... the lot code is not in the thermal paper gamma curve commit at all where is the proof supposed to be? (^^)