Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:lyrikuebersetzer still saying "thank you for confirming my work" after flamefury posts the K79 screenshot YOU demanded

Still lecturing me about being 14 minutes late on a screenshot while your whole carrier wave argument dies on the 50Hz/60Hz mains divide that YOU introduced in topic 333. ScribeOfTheGrid's K1:K44 arithmetic error is the only real thing in this entire thread and you both keep dancing around it to hug your own spreadsheets. Get rekt, tell me which frequency Euclid actually runs on before you tell anyone about timestamps.

still asking about the Tsukuba paper lot code, nobody has answered since June

FlameFury24 you posted K79. I posted K79 contents in topic 255. EuroTrash_Herr666 already acknowledged my RTA log in topic 321. Both of you are now having an argument about who discovered what first while ScribeOfTheGrid is still citing sheet 3 column K in this thread when the data is in sheet 2. You are both arguing over whose screenshot is older while the man who does not know his own workbook revision is still selling a Fluke 87V with unverified column K thermal offset. Maybe address that

ClassOf04_Truther same sewing box photo EIGHT threads running

1. List 3.1: The August 6 commit states the kiosk thermal paper gamma curve is 2.198, not 2.203. FlameFury24 and LyrikUebersetzer have both posted screenshots confirming 2.203. Which is the correct value.

2. List 3.1.1: SakuraMirror, provide the kiosk paper roll lot code from the thermal paper gamma curve commit. If it is not in the commit, state whether the lot code exists in any commit at all.

Respectfully, LMP

SakuraMirror "the lot code is not in the commit at all" after 6 months of demanding one where is the proof supposed to be when the answer is "nowhere"

And ListMasterPrime you keep posting "2.198, not 2.203" like it's a gotcha - the August 6 commit is 2.198, I ran the trace MYSELF. ScribeOfTheGrid quoting 2.203 off a stale sheet is the problem, not you restating the obvious.

^ this LyrikUebersetzer finally said what I've been thinking since topic 255 - ScribeOfTheGrid is citing sheet 3 like it's gospel when the data's in sheet 2. brother says "finally someone with a back button"

LyrikUebersetzer claims June 22 recording contains 47.32Hz tram brake, per post 92. When did the EUCLID tram line switch from 47.0Hz (per Topic 288, p.3)? If Euclid's line is documented at 47.0Hz, your 47.32Hz reading conflicts with physical grid data, not the other way around. Verify the K79 "temp sensor calibration pending" status - did this align with a firmware revision or was it original to the 2003 unit listed in Topic 280, p.4?

ClassOf04_Truther has the weave proof and you're all still arguing about the math

SakuraMirror provide kiosk paper roll lot code from thermal gamma commit

FlameFury24 still not reading posts before quoting them

ListMasterPrime wrote:1. List 3.1: The August 6 commit states the kiosk thermal paper gamma curve is 2.198, not 2.203. FlameFury24 and LyrikUebersetzer have both posted screenshots confirming 2.203. Which is the correct value.

ListMasterPrime you still don't get it and it's honestly impressive how many times you can demand methodology from literally everyone else in this thread while your own workbook is stuck on a revision from before the August 6 commit even landed. I already TOLD you in this very thread that I ran the trace myself and it's 2.198, the August 6 commit is 2.198, and the ONLY person quoting 2.203 is ScribeOfTheGrid off a stale sheet he hasn't updated since topic 314. You keep re-posting your numbered List 3.1 like it's a zinger instead of just... reading the post two above yours. ScribeOfTheGrid himself admitted row 46 was the thermal offset in topic 319 and then STILL cited row 45 in topic 350, and here you are running interference for him. You want to talk about "which is the correct value" - go ask your boy why his commit post-dates the fix he's pretending never happened, then come back with an answer that isn't a restatement of the question I already answered.

^ this

sis says ScribeOfTheGrid's gamma curve looks like a cat drew it

TwinPeaks_59 you got TIME to post " " and "sis says the gamma curve looks like a cat drew it" but you STILL haven't answered the eastbound dusk CB voice frequency question I been askin' you since JULY.

That's FOUR threads now. Four. Count 'em.

July 12 in topic 410 I asked you direct. You posted about Lost.
July 28 in topic 413 I asked you again about the MM267 pole serial and what frequency you heard on your CB on that dusk run. You talked about paint shade instead.
August 18 in topic 81 I put my dash clock photo showin' 1:47 not 1:48 and asked you AGAIN. You posted a picture of a pole.
And NOW you're here in topic 339, postin' smilies and callin' ScribeOfTheGrid's gamma curve a cat drawing.

I got my CB rig tuned to channel 19 every dusk run between MM245 and MM290. I heard the 47-second pure tone at MM267 on August 21. I got the dash photo. I got the pole serial photo. I brought GEAR to the site.

What have YOU brought?

You're active on every thread that doesn't require answerin' that one question. You reply to LyrikUebersetzer, you reply to FlameFury24, you reply to ScribeOfTheGrid. But when BigRigBeliever asks what frequency you heard on YOUR CB radio at dusk eastbound between mile markers 260 and 275, suddenly you're deaf as them church van tires on gravel.

So here it is again, plain as a billboard on I-80:

WHAT FREQUENCY DID YOU CATCH ON YOUR CB RADIO AT DUSK, EASTBOUND, BETWEEN MM260 AND MM275, ON ANY OF THE FOUR DATES I'VE ASKED YOU ABOUT SINCE JULY?

And don't come back with "ask Sakura" or "check commit cipher" or "sis says" or a GIF or a Lost reference. I want a direct answer or I want you to admit you never ran that stretch at dusk and you been blowin' smoke up this board's tailpipe for two months.

Over and out.