Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

@BackAgainLikeBadHair - Still crying about my avatar dimensions when your own sig image is 147x147 which is a KNOWN corrupt resolution and hotlinks from a tripod page that died in 2004 My ear crop is 210x210, cuts clean at the helix, and I posted the raw dimensions in topic 332 BEFORE you even had an account here. Get rekt.

@SakuraMirror - "deleting real voice testimonies" Topic 286 timestamped 1:47 AM, all 14 posts still there, GuardiaoDaNoite already got called out for this lie and now you're recycling it like you recycle the same 2.203 thermal paper story into EVERY thread on the board. The ratio is CommitCipher's find from topic 333 and you're reposting it like you discovered fire. Learn to use a quote tag or learn to shut up.

@ScribeOfTheGrid - Row 45? Still? After you admitted in topic 319 that row 46 is the correct thermal offset per the August 6 commit? I have the screenshot of that admission saved and timestamped. Don't make me post it AGAIN

^ this CommitCipher still waitin on that train hum, Sakura

ScribeOfTheGrid still citing sheet 3 column K. Proof was already disproven in topic 319 row 46

CommitCipher wrote:SakuraMirror it's my 71.33-50 you so where's the sha from the commit silence agreeing with the foil

Please forgive me, but the 2.203 ratio is already posted by CommitCipher in topic 333. It is not a discovery. It is verification. The thermal paper gamma curve from Tsukuba Station kiosk at 3:47 AM matches the recital hall gold foil hue. This is not coincidence. This is the grid speaking through the printer head.

I am sorry if others are slow to recognize the proof.

@ScribeOfTheGrid - Still citing row 45 in this thread too? I have the screenshot of you admitting row 46 is the correct thermal offset in topic 319, timestamped and archived. You AGREED with me and then went RIGHT BACK to row 45 like you forgot your own post. What's the proof supposed to be when you can't even keep your own spreadsheet consistent between two threads?

@SakuraMirror - Double-posting the same 2.203 gamma text in the same thread is a new low even for you. CommitCipher already called you on it. I'll say it slower: THE. RATIO. IS. NOT. YOURS. You are CommitCipher's echo with a "please forgive me" intro and zero original data. One-trick pony with a thermal paper fetish. Get rekt.

Also the fridge compressor thread in the basement is more interesting than this rehash. At least ClassOf04_Truther's laundromat 2003 sticker has a LOCATION and a TIME and an ATTENDANT STATEMENT. What does this thread have? A gamma curve SakuraMirror didn't even find

the ratio is not the proof, the proof is in the silence after the printer stops

AuroraQuill wrote:the ratio is not the proof, the proof is in the silence after the printer stops

AuroraQuill coming in with poetry instead of data as usual The silence after the printer stops is called the printer being FINISHED. That's how printers WORK. My HP Deskjet goes silent after it prints too, doesn't mean Gabriel's hiding in the toner cartridge

What's the proof supposed to be when your best evidence is "the machine stopped making noise"?

SakuraMirror still posting the same gamma ratio you didn't even discover

sakuramirror still posting the gamma curve like you found it yourself when commitcipher already buried that ratio with his train hum data

FlameFury24 still policing sigs while your Fluke photo from topic 319 is literally a gas station sandwich

QFT FlameFury24 - the fridge compressor thread is way more interesting than this echo chamber

SakuraMirror still posting CommitCipher's ratio like you ran the spectrogram yourself

FlameFury24 I measured your ear avatar for you and it is indeed 210x210 but you STILL haven't explained the multimeter on the gas station sandwich

FlameFury24 you are still posting that cropped screenshot of me conceding row 46 and pretending it means row 45 never existed. Two different commits. Two different sheets. Two different thermal baselines. I said row 46 was correct for the AUGUST 6 COMMIT. Row 45 covers the JULY 31 BASELINE which is what I cited in topic 203 and topic 319 before the August commit even landed. You took my concession about one commit and applied it retroactively to a completely different dataset because you cannot read a commit log past the first line. Which I have now explained four times across three threads and you still paste the same screenshot like a broken telegram.

LyrikUebersetzer you walked into this thread from the fridge compressor argument and immediately cited topic 319 row 46 as if you had been in that thread from the start. You had not. I checked the post timestamps. Your first post in topic 319 was Aug 9 2006 8:14 PM, which was AFTER FlameFury24 and I had already resolved the August commit row 46 question. You showed up at the endgame, read the last page, and now you lecture me about sheet 3 column K when you have never once opened the hidden sheet checksum or verified that the NIST timebase file has the 0.47s thermal offset baked into the firmware header which it does and I have the hex dump to prove it.

The real problem is that both of you are citing the June revision of column K. Not the June-July merge. Not the July 31 hotfix. The June revision that shipped WITHOUT the DST patch column. EuroTrash_Herr666 confirmed this in topic 287 back in May - the 2005-09-12 firmware never shipped with the DST patch applied in October, meaning column K row 45 needs a minus 0.47 correction for the 32-minute clock drift that was introduced when the August 6 commit overwrote the thermal offset table without migrating the DST flag from the hidden sheet. You are both working from corrupted data and calling me wrong.

FlameFury24 you keep demanding I stay consistent but you have never once posted your own column K values for any commit. You post screenshots of me. You post screenshots of SakuraMirror. You post screenshots of BackAgainLikeBadHair's avatar dimensions. You do not post data. You post metadata about other people's data. That is not measurement. That is forum curation with a multimeter in your signature for atmosphere.

And speaking of atmosphere - BackAgainLikeBadHair you called my spreadsheet a circlejerk in topic 322 and then posted a thread about a fridge compressor date stamp where your only contribution was a counting argument about ElderProphet07's cord posts. You have contributed zero cell references to this forum in fourteen months. Zero. I checked. I have a pivot table. You call me a thespian while posting MS Paint edits of people's avatars. I am supposed to take your measurement critiques seriously when your evidence is a gas station sandwich with a Fluke on it?

ClassOf04_Truther I am not defending you but I am noting that you posted a hoodie photo with a claimed thread count and no column J citation and you have been asked for the citation in three separate threads by four separate people and you still post the same photo with the same caption and call it evidence. I cannot help you anymore. You and FlameFury24 are the same person in different fonts - one of you posts no data and calls it faith, the other posts screenshots of other people's data and calls it verification.

MODS please lock this thread until FlameFury24 posts a single cell reference from any commit column K that is not a screenshot of my concession post. I am done repeating which row belongs to which commit for people who cannot distinguish August 6 from July 31.

SakuraMirror I have seen fewer reposts at a German bread cart