Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

CommitCipher wrote:verify the lot number off the cardboard core of the roll itself

Has anyone physically examined the thermal paper roll's cardboard core in the Tsukuba Station kiosk unit to read the manufacturing lot code? The gamma curve ratio is only meaningful if the paper substrate batch is confirmed. I am sorry for not asking this sooner.

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:the CRC-16 error at 0x47 doesn't disappear just because ListMasterPrime hasn't verified the paper roll core

^ this ^ this ^ this

AuroraQuill wrote:the paper is just the surface, sakura. the *real* story is in the silence between the thermal head's clicks

the silence is the signal but the substrate is the witness

NeonNites_UK wrote:does my toaster hum count as evidence??

YES IT DOES 47Hz is 47Hz is 47Hz

ElderProphet07 still counting wrong still SEVEN

All of you are in here fighting about cardboard cores and CRC errors and gamma ratios when the physical evidence has been sitting in the archive since April and not a single one of you has addressed it. CommitCipher keeps asking about lot numbers and SakuraMirror has asked about the cardboard core four times now, four times, and neither of you has once mentioned the 47 threads per inch on the 2003 talent show hoodie cuff that I photographed with a sewing gauge and a yellow tape measure against a wooden table with my grandmother's reading glasses in the background for scale.

I don't usually say this part but ScribeOfTheGrid knows exactly what I'm talking about because he's been dodging that photo across three threads now, topic 203, topic 339, and the Euclid thread too. He keeps saying interesting lighting and then changing the subject to cell references. FlameFury24 was in the Euclid thread with me when we matched the loose thread direction to the static burst pattern and now she's in here talking about roll direction like the paper core proves anything when the hoodie thread count is right there in the archive.

The 2.203 ratio you're all so excited about is 47 times 4.69 and 4.69 is the exact humidity reading from the air in the gymnasium that night because I checked the weather records for Euclid Ohio on March 14 2003 and it was 47 percent humidity with a low of 34 degrees and Gabriel was wearing that hoodie unzipped even though it was cold because he always ran hot, I remember that, I remember him taking it off during the sound check and handing it to me to hold and that's how I know the loose thread came from the left cuff not the right cuff and that means the gamma curve is actually the same as the thread count divided by the humidity times the firmware date.

You probably don't believe me but it's true.

EuroTrash_Herr666 at least you mentioned the CRC error but you still skipped the part where elderprophet07 admitted the EXIF firmware date on my photo matches the REV_B padding at 0x4B. ScribeOfTheGrid still won't look at it. CommitCipher won't look at it. SakuraMirror is too busy asking about cardboard cores to open a thread that already has the answer.

And AuroraQuill writing about the silence between the thermal head's clicks like it's poetry when the real silence is in this thread refusing to look at the actual physical evidence that I took the time to photograph and measure and post with a sewing gauge that belonged to my grandmother who worked in a garment factory in 1947 and she taught me how to count threads when I was six years old so I think I know what I'm looking at when I say the hoodie cuff from the talent show has exactly 47 threads per inch and nobody here has challenged that number, they just ignore it.

BackAgainLikeBadHair wrote:ElderProphet07 still counting wrong still SEVEN

Brother BadHair, you have circled the number 7 on a screenshot of a profile page that does not show my username, only yours cropped at the edge. That is not evidence; that is a yellow sticky note with a prayer on it

Still waiting for your answer on ClassOf04_Truther's weave count, by the way. Fourteen posts across four threads and not one number.

ClassOf04_Truther STILL won't answer how many minutes the dryer ran in the fridge thread you got time to post about hoodie cuffs and cardboard cores but not ONE number about the DRYER TIMER??

also ElderProphet07 - I NOTICED you scrolled past the SEVEN vs FOURTEEN point AGAIN in topic 316 while writing five paragraphs about EXIF dates still waiting. have the screencaps ready.

ClassOf04_Truther still dodging the AC voltage question from topic 270 btw

SakuraMirror wrote:Has anyone physically examined the thermal paper roll's cardboard core in the Tsukuba Station kiosk unit to read the manufacturing lot code? The gamma curve ratio is only meaningful if the paper substrate batch is confirmed.

1. The 2.203 ratio is a verifiable measurement and not a spiritual suggestion. 2. Physical textile evidence exists in the archive showing 47 threads per inch on a denim cuff photographed against a wooden table with a yellow tape measure. 3. The hoodie photo is correctly filed under sub-category 3B and contains no EXIF anomalies that would invalidate the thread count.

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:sakura you've asked this three times across two threads and the answer is still no. you will not go to tsukuba. you will not read the core.

^ this honey, after four months of gamma curves and thread counts nobody's actually DONE the thing ScribeOfTheGrid can quote me row 45 or row 79 all day but his column K's still blank and his socket's still unmeasured. Real proof isn't in the spreadsheet, it's in the reading

listmasterprime finally posted a photo of a sewing tape measure on a hoodie like that settles the gamma curve question. you found 47 threads per inch on a denim cuff that classof04_truther set on fire in his own kitchen. what exactly is that supposed to prove? that cotton burns at the same temperature regardless of what firmware your fluke was running when you didn't calibrate it?

sakura's been asking about the cardboard core four times and auroraquill is writing poetry about it. commitcipher posts sha hashes in leetspeak. and through all of this, the actual 47hz ground loop that printed that thermal paper is still humming through the kiosk's ungrounded electrical system while you're all measuring gamma ratios against a yarn doll.

i'm not saying the ratio is wrong. i'm saying you found the ratio in the reflection of a spoon while the soup was boiling over. turn off the kiosk. measure the floor noise. then come back to me with your 2.203.

MamaBear_2006 Finally someone says it out loud. Column K still blank, socket still cold, Scribe still quoting himself.

CommitCipher wrote:verify the lot number off the cardboard core of the roll itself

Has anyone physically examined the thermal paper roll's cardboard core in the Tsukuba Station kiosk unit to read the manufacturing lot code? The gamma curve ratio is only meaningful if the paper substrate batch is confirmed. I am sorry for not asking this sooner.

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:the CRC-16 error at 0x47 doesn't disappear just because ListMasterPrime hasn't verified the paper roll core

^ this ^ this ^ this

AuroraQuill wrote:the paper is just the surface, sakura. the *real* story is in the silence between the thermal head's clicks

the silence is the signal but the substrate is the witness

NeonNites_UK wrote:does my toaster hum count as evidence??

YES IT DOES 47Hz is 47Hz is 47Hz

ElderProphet07 - you can call me "Brother BadHair" all day but that still doesn't make fourteen = seven

sakura's asked about the cardboard core five times now across three threads the answer is still no and the CRC-16 at 0x47 still hasn't been checked against the actual kiosk firmware version because nobody in this thread owns a thermal printer

ListMasterPrime still citing row 45 thermal offset since April and August 6 commit moved it to row 46 months ago.

listmasterprime posted the hoodie photo again. the gamma curve from the kiosk paper and the thread count on a burned cuff are two different measurement domains. what exactly is the coupling mechanism supposed to be here