Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

SundayFarewell you measure the rattle but not the 71.33 Hz carrier wave that carries the rattle

^ SakuraMirror shes the only one hittin a plausible frequency, rest are arguin bout screwdrivers while the lath shakes. felt that rattle in my own cab on a dead midnight stretch once, aint no bus bar doin that over and out

EndTimesEli wrote:The 1.4V decay ChronoClerk documented is not drift between two outlets, it is the voltage leaving the system entirely.

chronoclerk measured with a fluke 87v set to auto-range. that meter has a stated accuracy of +/- 0.5% on dc voltage and +/- 1.2% on ac voltage at 60hz. your "1.4V decay" falls well within the margin of error for a cheap multimeter left sitting in a hot studio. you're reading noise.

the lath shakes because you have an unbalanced three-phase feed hitting a single-phase tap. when the kiln cycles off, the neutral current drops, the imbalance shifts, and the remaining phase sees a voltage spike. that spike resonates through the metal studs and drywall. you feel it as vibration. it's basic power quality stuff.

you want proof? put a true-rms meter on the circuit during the "quiet" period. measure total harmonic distortion. if thd exceeds 5%, you've got nonlinear loads creating harmonics that couple into the building structure. post the waveform screenshot. stop talking about grid shifts and show me the oscilloscope trace.

also chronoclerk your iso citation is wrong. iso 690 covers bibliographic references, not harmonic analysis. use iec 61000-4-30 for power quality measurements next time.

there is no plumbing route of least resistance from the breaker to the ceiling fan when the breaker itself is vibrating violently and we have burned kozo vellum to prove it:

there is no plumbing route of least resistance from the breaker to the ceiling fan when the breaker itself is vibrating violently and we have burned kozo vellum to prove it:

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:^^ this EndTimesEli

EXACTLY. They want us to measure the load but the load is GONE. That is the whole point of the Going Quiet.

TechAngel_00 your diagram at 0x47 is a literal null byte stop asking for traces

TechAngel_00 still demanding an oscilloscope trace while his own diagram at 0x47 is a literal null byte

CharcoalSoul_88 wrote:there is no plumbing route of least resistance from the breaker to the ceiling fan when the breaker itself is vibrating violently and we have burned kozo vellum to prove it:

you are burning paper in a room with a loose neutral. the vibration is 60hz hum from the transformer. check your connections.

EndTimesEli the lath shakes at 1:47 but the breaker panel is right there and you wont touch a screwdriver

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:^^ this EndTimesEli

TwinPeaks_59 you been quotin Eli for three months but you still aint answered my June question about that eastbound dusk CB voice that sounds like a solo from Crown of Nails. You got time to talk about cat chassis but not the frequency you heard that night? Put up or shut the breaker up.

TechAngel_00 wrote:iso 690 covers bibliographic references, not harmonic analysis. use iec 6100

iec 61000 not 6100, nice typo

^ this

^ TechAngel_00 exactly what I was thinking. my dad was an electrician for 30 years and he always said check the simple stuff first before you go looking for signs and wonders. a loose neutral will drive you crazy if you start looking for deeper meaning. not that I am saying theres no meaning in it, just... check the panel first you know

charcoal and vellum and a breaker that hums at the exact frequency of his silence the wall knew before we did