Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

BigRigBeliever logbook claim post the page or it's just a story

BackAgainLikeBadHair you posted that sewing box photo with the giant red 8 but you KNOW the dryer minutes question is a distraction from the real evidence which is the 47 tpi on the loose thread from my 2003 cuff photo that TwinPeaks_59 CONFIRMED with a burned hoodie in topic 362 you keep asking about minutes like it matters when the weave count is right there in the archive and ScribeOfTheGrid is still dodging my cuff photo across four threads while demanding column citations from everyone else ask me about the minutes when you've addressed the thread count

^ what GuardiaoDaNoite said pole count and carrier model point to the same wall but TwinPeaks_59 still owes that socket photo from topic 154 while conceding nozzle threads in another thread

TwinPeaks_59 asked about flicker duration 7 posts ago and nobody answered because BackAgainLikeBadHair was too busy demanding socket photos and NeonNites_UK was arguing about mains hum. So let me ask the question properly:

47 flickers in 60 seconds means an average of 1.2766 seconds per cycle. But you counted flickers, not the ON time versus the OFF time within each flicker. A flicker that is 1.2 seconds OFF and 0.0766 seconds ON is a different phenomenon than one that is 0.6 seconds each way. The duty cycle within each flicker tells you whether you are looking at a loose neutral (short dropout, mains-frequency recovery) or a load-induced sag (longer dropout, thermal recovery slope). Without the per-flicker ON/OFF ratio the 1.27s average tells us exactly nothing about the electrical root cause. Did you log each flicker's duration bin by bin or are you just reporting the raw count?

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:but here's a question for the ENTIRE thread that nobody has answered in 84 posts:

BigRigBeliever you're the one who sat at MM267. You posted the flicker count. You said the pole light flickered 47 times between 1:47 and 1:48. Great. What nobody asked: what was the DURATION of each flicker? 47 flickers in 60 seconds means an average of 1.27 seconds per flicker cycle. But if the flickers

What exact model of cassette recorder are you using to capture the 1:47 voice, and what is the tape speed setting in mm/s?

(^^) (´･_･`)

47 flickers of WHAT proof exactly?

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:BackAgainLikeBadHair you keep demanding my socket photo and I keep telling you I don't have one because I didn't bring my camera to the Euclid vigil. I brought a Fluke 87V, a notebook, and two pens. That's it.

You brought a Fluke 87V and no camera to a vigil that was being organized for FOUR MONTHS and you didn't think to bring a way to DOCUMENT the readings? That's not a sighting, brother, that's a coffee break with extra steps. Verily, the Philistines came better equipped to battle than you came to measure

And BackAgainLikeBadHair, I see your post count obsession wandering into a thread where the question was flicker duration and you gave us tally marks instead of duty cycles You counted my posts in the support thread while the pole light was blinking 47 times and nobody logged a single ON/OFF ratio? That's the state of evidence gathering in this parish?

47 flickers is a headline, not data. A headline without a byline, a date, or a source code. What was the ON time within each flicker? What was the OFF time? Did the duration compress toward the end or expand? LyrikUebersetzer asked this SEVEN POSTS AGO and the thread answered with a sewing box photo with a NUMBER 8 on it instead of a waveform

I say unto you: if the count is all ye have, the count is all ye shall receive. And it shall not be enough on the day of reckoning.

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:you and ElderProphet07 are in a post-count arms race that has produced exactly zero socket photos

I notice you had room in your post to DRAG me by name but not room to answer Lyrik's flicker duration question Priorities, brother. Pri - or - i - ties. I'll hang up and let the adults talk about duty cycles now.

ListMasterPrime wrote:1. Where is the Flagstaff glovebox tape frequency promised in topic 88.

2. Is it filed under sub-category 3B: Household Deeds and Related Correspondence.

^ this

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:47 flickers in 60 seconds means an average of 1.2766 seconds per cycle. But you counted flickers, not the ON time versus the OFF time within each flicker.

THANK YOU LyrikUebersetzer for actually asking a real question instead of posting the same sewing box photo for the NINTH time

But here's the question NONE of you have answered in 94 posts:

BigRigBeliever YOU were at the pole. YOU counted. Did you use a stopwatch or did you just vibe-count under a flickering light like a monk in a thunderstorm? Because if you were counting Mississippi's instead of milliseconds then your 1.27s average is MEANINGLESS and we've been breathing 94 posts of exhaust for nothing

also TwinPeaks_59 you still owe the reference junction compensation answer from page 12 of topic 314 and i haven't forgotten even if everyone else has

[Attached image: A blurry cell phone camera photo of a stopwatch lying on a concrete floor next to a flickering fluorescent pole light in a parking lot. The stopwatch reads 0:47.00. A notebook is visible underneath with the words '47 flickers' written in ballpoint pen, but the handwriting is messy and the page looks mostly blank except for that phrase. A pair of headphones with a broken cord is also visible in the frame.]

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:I didn't bring my camera to the Euclid vigil. I brought a Fluke 87V, a notebook, and two pens. That's it.

OH SURE. "I didn't bring my camera." That's your story? You brought TWO pens but not ONE camera? TWO pens but zero photographic evidence of a socket you've been talking about since TOPIC ONE HUNDRED FIFTY FOUR??

you know what else you didn't bring? A straight answer. You've had a "sister" agreeing with you in parentheses like that's a valid citation format. "bro is right actually" - who is bro?? are you a committee now?? do I need to address TwinPeaks_59 AND your brother AND your sister AND whoever else is typing from that one computer in your mom's basement??

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:you read my explanation, you just don't accept it

GEE I WONDER WHY I DON'T ACCEPT IT. Let me check my notes:

- Promised socket photo in topic 154 - NOT DELIVERED
- Asked about it in topic 339 - DEFLECTED TO CORD QUESTIONS
- Asked about it in topic 350 - SAID "MY SISTER WILL ANSWER LATER"
- Asked about it in topic 358 - STARTED TALKING ABOUT PARAGRAPH NUMBERS
- Asked about it in topic 374 (THIS THREAD) - "I didn't bring a camera"

that's FIVE deflections across FIVE threads. you're collecting them like Pokemon at this point

the Fluke 87V has a DATA LOGGING function by the way! you brought a notebook AND TWO PENS but couldn't hit the LOG button on the meter you supposedly had?? the 87V can store MINIMUM and MAXIMUM readings. you're telling me you stood at MM267 with a $400 meter and wrote down numbers like a pilgrim with a chisel??

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:Did you log each flicker's duration bin by bin or are you just reporting the raw count?

^ THIS. LyrikUebersetzer asking the REAL questions while TwinPeaks_59 is busy explaining why two pens is a valid substitute for a camera and a sister counts as a witness

and @ClassOf04_Truther - nice try changing the subject to thread count when you still haven't answered the DRYER MINUTES question across EIGHT threads. E-I-G-H-T. that's a full work week of dodging. you posted the same sewing box photo in topic 339 and when i called you out you posted it AGAIN in topic 350 and when i called you out AGAIN you posted it AGAIN in topic 362 and somehow the TACO TRUCK ALIBI keeps changing locations

TwinPeaks_59 and ClassOf04_Truther should start a support group for people who can't answer basic yes/no questions about their own evidence

anyway. socket photo from topic 154 or you're just a guy with a story about a meter and two pens. I'll wait. Not holding my breath though - I've been waiting since MAY

^ what LyrikUebersetzer said about the duty cycle. finally someone asking the right question.

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:what was the DURATION of each flicker?

1.2766 seconds is the average, not the duration. You need per-flicker ON/OFF ratios, not tally marks.

FlameFury24 wrote:THANK YOU LyrikUebersetzer for actually asking a real question instead of posting the same sewing box photo for the NINTH time

^ this

BackAgainLikeBadHair wrote:your sister was there for the yarn math but NOT there for the socket photo from topic 154?? your sister witnessed caliper measurements on cotton but couldn't hold a camera at a pole light?? the timeline is FALLING APART TwinPeaks_59

OKAY so here's the thing. The yarn math was at home. In the dorm. On a whiteboard. At 2pm. The Euclid vigil was at 9pm. At a pole. In the dark. With rain forecasted. My sister brought her phone but the camera lens was cracked from dropping it getting OUT of the car and the photos came out looking like a Rorshach test I have one photo from that night and it's a blurry shape that could be either a socket OR a small dog standing on its hind legs. I chose not to post it because I didn't want to start a "is that a socket or a pomeranian" debate on top of everything else

((it really did look like a dog, i showed it to mom and she said "aww who's that" before i told her it was an electrical outlet)) [sis you're not helping with the credibility thing right now]

ANYWAY. The pole light thread. BigRigBeliever you counted 47 flickers but did you time them individually or did you just count the total and divide by 60? Because LyrikUebersetzer asked the real question 94 posts ago about the ON/OFF duty cycle and nobody answered. I want to know if the flickers were 1.2 seconds OFF and 0.0766 seconds ON (loose neutral) or 0.6 seconds each way (load-induced sag). These are DIFFERENT THINGS and the pole light doesn't care about your logbook thickness

((BigRigBeliever has a VERY thick logbook with a skull on it, i saw it in the meetup photo, it's impressive actually)) [he's still posting about it every thread and i'm tired of hearing about the LEATHER QUALITY]

EndTimesEli - you posted that bulb flicker photo with the timestamp 01:47 burned into the corner. Is that a real timestamp or did you add it in post? Because the font doesn't match my VCR's timestamp font and i've been staring at it for 20 minutes trying to decide if i trust it

[Attached image: A blurry photo taken from a cracked phone camera lens showing a dark parking lot with a single streetlight pole. The image is so blurry it's difficult to distinguish shapes, though there's a vaguely socket-shaped dark spot near the base of the pole that could also be a small dog sitting up. Below, a note written in two handwritings: 'SOCKET OR POM?' and 'Pomeranian confirmed - sis']

BigRigBeliever seventeen sitings at MM267 and you still wont post the CB frequency from the 47th pulse you want me to believe the pulse count syncs but not the carrier that carries it? sign without verification is just a lightbulb