Board index » MISSING: EUCLID §7.2 column K thermal decay offset - filing deadline Aug 18 2006

EuroTrash_Herr666
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness50HzEuclidTruthDoubleZeroPusherTomorrowMeansNever
Posts: 1528
Reputation: +14 ■■
Joined: Jul 14, 2006
From: Berlin (sprawling on a park bench, obviously)
z0pl your fluke firmware is from 2003 and the DST patch was never applied yet you lecture everyone about EXIF timestamps :dumbbravo:

47 swans. zero photocopied chapters. i know which evidence chain i trust. :moonwalk:
ClassOf04_Truther
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witnessTomorrowMeansNever
Posts: 1480
Reputation: +7 ■
Joined: Jun 23, 2006
From: Somewhere Gabriel knows
EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:the denim weave grain from classof04_truther's cuff photo is the actual thermocouple variable that everything else indexes against


EuroTrash thank you. Someone FINALLY said it out loud. Four months of Scribe dodging the weave grain while citing empty cells and you just... said it. Like it was obvious. Because it IS obvious. The 47 threads per inch in that 2003 cuff photo match the Euclid junction box angle exactly - I don't usually tell this part, but... the night I took that photo I was standing so close to Gabe that I could smell his detergent, and the loose thread on the left cuff seam lined up with the scratch in the paint on the box behind him, and I didn't even notice it until I developed the film a week later. You probably don't believe me, but it's true.

Anyway. At least someone here can read fabric grain instead of spreadsheet vapor :angel:

2 pushes, 0 commits - more output than I got from cousin's house all month :dumbbravo: hot pocket bet still pending