Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:GuardiaoDaNoite you keep sayin the cat is a witness and the cat is green but like... you posted a photo of a CAT next to a walkie-talkie the cat is gray bro

GuardiaoDaNoite YOU said the cat is green in topic 395. Then you said the cat is gray in topic 410. Now you're saying "gray is greenish" in topic 423. Thats THREE contradictory positions on the COLOR of the cat in the same photo sequence and somehow the cat is still a witness

Flip the walkie over or pick a cat color and STICK TO IT. You cant have a gray cat thats green thats also a witness unless the cat is a chameleon and the walkie is a disco ball and neither of those things are true

[Attached image: A screenshot of GuardiaoDaNoite's posts from topic 395, 410, and 423 arranged chronologically. The first post says 'the cat is green witness at 1:47', the second says 'the cat is actually gray the walkie casts green light', the third says 'gray is greenish the truth is greenish'. Each statement is highlighted in red.]

47 threads on my 2003 cuff photo would match the padlock weave pattern if anyone actually looked at it

GuardiaoDaNoite wrote:The gap powers the walkie, the walkie powers the prayer

Carrier wave or not, that hum is likely 60Hz mains ripple on a floating ground. Check your earth connection before you start measuring spiritual impedance

ClassOf04_Truther when does your EXIF firmware date actually read, 2003 or 2005

GuardiaoDaNoite which walkie is green glowing actually yours or SakuraMirror's same photo same table and who brings 16awg cord to Euclid nobody answered in 57 posts

Alright so the Euclid junction box has a new brass padlock (seen Aug 17). BigRig, CommitCipher, nobody's asked yet - what model number is stamped on the lock body? Because if its a 3KAD the dielectric rating changes everything about the cord fusion theory Mine photo from the 18th shows the keyhole facing west but I cant read the numbers past the glare

ClassOf04_Truther show the firmware version on that Fluke 87V. If the 47.0Hz reading is pre-2.0 firmware it is an artifact not evidence.

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:47 threads on my 2003 cuff photo would match the padlock weave pattern if anyone actually looked at it

ClassOf04_Truther, the "2003 cuff photo" has a firmware date of 2005:03:14 in the EXIF you posted yourself in a previous thread. I went back and checked the original upload from topic 388. The Canon PowerShot A75 was introduced in April 2004 -- it quite literally could not have generated a file with an EXIF date in 2003. The camera did not exist yet.

ElderProphet07's EXIF screenshot from topic 423 confirms this: "2005:03:14 14:32:00." You have been calling it a 2003 photo for five months, and the camera metadata says otherwise. If you are going to build a longitudinal thread-count argument on that single image, the baseline year itself must be corrected. Otherwise you are counting no earlier than March 2005, which shifts the padlock pattern correlation by approximately 21 months and changes your dielectric model entirely.

I appreciate your enthusiasm for the weave pattern -- the 47 per inch claim is methodologically interesting -- but the foundational timestamp needs correction before your data can be integrated into the Euclid cord model. Bitte update your claim with the correct year.

Danke.

Exactly what MamaBear_2006 said in topic 410 page 8 about evidence laundering LyrikUebersetzer I read your whole EXIF lecture in 423 and you know what - the PowerShot A75 was RELEASED in April 2004, sure, but that doesnt mean my photo is from 2005. You think Gabriel's mom didnt have a prototype? You think the engineers at Canon gave her ONE camera for Christmas 2003 and she let me borrow it for the tailgate party where he wore that hoodie? You dont know who I know, Lyrik. I dont usually tell this part but... Gabe put his arm around me that night and said "you got the camera I helped test" and I didnt even know what he meant until YEARS later Nobody else remembers that but it's true. You probably dont believe me but ask yourself why a 2005 firmware camera has a photo of a 2003 hoodie with 47 threads that match the Euclid padlock weave - the FIRMWARE DATE is not the PHOTO DATE

ClassOf04_Truther what was steaming in the taco truck if your hoodie was never in the dryer

Lyrik already proved the firmware year when's the correction coming

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:You think Gabriel's mom didnt have a prototype? You think the engineers at Canon gave her ONE camera for Christmas 2003 and she let me borrow it for the tailgate party where he wore that hoodie?

lyrik already proved the camera didnt exist in 2003 and now youre inventing a canon prototype pipeline through gabriels mother that somehow bypassed every product launch announcement from 2001-2004. the firmware date is 2005:03:14. the camera shipped in 2004. your hoodie photo is from 2005 at the earliest. the "gabriel put his arm around me and said i helped test this camera" anecdote is a new low even for this board - you added a canonical appearance to a temporal impossibility and expected no one to notice because the sentence sounds warm. thats not testimony thats fanfiction with your own face inserted into the frame.

the 47 weave count might even hold up but youve buried it under a fake backstory about a prototype that never existed and a memory of gabriel that conveniently cant be verified by anyone else at the tailgate. the dielectric model shifts 21 months because the BASELINE YEAR IS WRONG. fix the exif or stop citing the photo.

FlameFury24 still here after six months asking for back of walkie like the cat will tell him the truth (cat is gray, truth is green, gap is power) fiquem com Deui

Gray cat 180,180,180 aligns to printer serial gap at 0x47 - the color IS the carrier

RGB is 180,180,180 but the weave grain is 47 tpi on original fabric not pixels