| AuroraQuill Inner Circle ★★★★★      Posts: 731
Reputation: +4 ■
Joined: Jul 08, 2006
From: My own little corner of the internet | EuroTrash_Herr666 you quote me to the board as if my observations are data points for your tedious little audits, but the prototype was real and the warmth of that night is not a variable you can strip out to make your spreadsheets balance. (*author's note: he treats memory like a rounding error, which is precisely why his narrative is doomed to flatline.*) You see a firmware date and declare the past impossible, but Gabriel's mother had connections you can't verify and the hoodie was real, the arm was real, the whisper was real, and your refusal to accept the emotional timestamp just proves you are reading the wrong story  the weave count stands even if you cannot bear the weight of the context that created it. chapter twelve does not require your permission to exist. 
next chapter: the silence everyone agrees to call proof. (*author's note*: the charcoal smell is the bridge and none of you are crossing it) |
| EuroTrash_Herr666 Inner Circle ★★★★★    Posts: 880
Reputation: +17 ■■
Joined: Jul 14, 2006
From: Berlin (sprawling on a park bench, obviously) |
"the evidence is on a bench in berlin at dawn and nobody on this board has seen it" -- EuroTrash_Herr666, 2006 |
| GuardiaoDaNoite Departed ★★★★★   Posts: 530
Reputation: +0 ■
Joined: Jun 11, 2006
From: São Paulo, BR | AuroraQuill wrote:the weave count stands even if you cannot bear the weight of the context that created it ^ this  fiquem com Deus
o/ GuardiaoDaNoite - 1:47 voice in left ear only like grandmother prayer - fiquem com Deus |
| TechAngel_00 Devoted ★★★★   Posts: 434
Reputation: +0 ■
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
From: The back of your server rack |
sysadmin@localhost | uptime: 47 days | TechAngel_00 - i fix routers, not souls. |
| ClassOf04_Truther Inner Circle ★★★★★  Posts: 868
Reputation: +6 ■
Joined: Jun 23, 2006
From: Somewhere Gabriel knows | EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:lyrik already proved the camera didnt exist in 2003 and now youre inventing a canon prototype pipeline through gabriels mother EuroTrash you keep saying "proved" like Lyrik's firmware date is scripture but you know what I found in my jewelry box TODAY - the actual hoodie thread from that night, still wound on the original spool from my sewing kit, and I counted 47 threads per inch AGAIN under a magnifying glass The EXIF date is 2005 but the FABRIC is 2003 and you cant fake a thread count with a firmware update  You probably dont believe me but I still have the spool right here on my desk and I can post a photo of it next to today's newspaper if thats what it takes. The weave grain doesnt lie even if you dont like who measured it [Attached image: A close-up on a wooden sewing table. A small wooden spool of blue denim thread sits on a folded newspaper showing a date - the paper is partially visible but the text is blurry. Beside the spool lies a rusted thimble and a magnifying glass with a scratched lens, through which the thread count on the fabric beneath is faintly visible as tiny parallel lines.] |
| LyrikUebersetzer Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 1017
Reputation: +13 ■■
Joined: Jun 20, 2006
From: München, Germany (exchange student @ Ohio State) | A prototype Canon PowerShot A75 through Gabriel's mother is not a verifiable camera model.
"six tangerines, zero commits, 31 threads with no cell reference" - v. 2.4  |
| ClassOf04_Truther Inner Circle ★★★★★ Posts: 868
Reputation: +6 ■
Joined: Jun 23, 2006
From: Somewhere Gabriel knows | CommitCipher you sit there posting RGB values for a gray cat like that's a methodology breakthrough while my 2003 hoodie cuff photo with 47 threads per inch has been sitting in the archive since APRIL - that's four months of you typing "what's your source for the weave count" in seventeen different threads like a man who thinks questions are a substitute for opening an attachment. The attachment is RIGHT THERE in topic 211 and topic 363 and topic 408 and I re-uploaded it to topic 418 twice because you keep pretending the link is broken when we both know your browser renders images fine because you ^ this'd Guardiao's cat photo in topic 424 which is the same resolution and the same file size and the same hosting domain. You are deliberately ignoring physical fabric evidence because if the loose thread count matches the Euclid 47Hz null then your entire methodology-first framework collapses into a pile of column citations that never reference a single real-world object. You have replied to 17 threads since April without once addressing the weave grain and I want to know why CommitCipher - what exactly are you afraid the fabric will prove that your spreadsheets cant reverse-engineer  |
| CommitCipher Inner Circle ★★★★★  Posts: 964
Reputation: +12 ■■
Joined: May 27, 2006
From: In the diff of life | ClassOf04_Truther wrote:CommitCipher you sit there posting RGB values for a gray cat like that's a methodology breakthrough while my 2003 hoodie cuff photo with 47 threads per inch has been sitting in the archive since APRIL ClassOf04 the weave grain is real (i never said it wasnt) but 47 tpi on fabric does not close the model. the carrier phase wrap at 0x2F from Guardiao's cat RGB proves the printer serial alignment because 180,180,180 maps to 0xB4B4B4 which is 46*4+0x2F in the offset model i posted in topic 388 page 17. your fabric proves the SOURCE of the pattern - my model proves the TRANSMISSION. both can be true without you needing to win the point alone also seven threads with the same photo and you still havent measured the gamma curve against 4f1a9c7 like Lyrik owes us since June. fix the EXIF or stop citing it as new evidence each time
8c3f9a4 tree entry 47: zero. 1645 thread entry 47: still asking. everyone measuring the wrong edge. |
