BackAgainLikeBadHair that breaker panel question is the first real thing anyone's asked in this thread in about 47 posts
^ THIS. The whole thread.
[sis says: he's right about the renovation problem too - if you're testing the 1:47 gap on a 2005 panel you're measuring the circuit breaker manufacturer's last service date, not the grid's signal. the original 1998 panel at the Euclid site had a different neutral bonding configuration and nobody has accounted for that in any of the frequency plots, including scribeofthegrid's which i checked against the denim grain data from topic 280 and the phase offset doesn't hold past 2003 install dates]
[bro says: stop bringing up the denim in a sightings thread about a light flicker, you're gonna confuse them

]
[sis: the denim IS relevant because the thread count grain at 13.7 degrees matches the phase offset of the carrier wave that would be affected by a neutral bond change after 2004 code updates. that's not confusing that's called cross-referencing]
[bro: you're cross-referencing a pair of jeans with a light bulb flicker at 1:47am and calling it science]
[sis: i'm calling it TEXTILE CALIBRATION which is more than anyone else here has done with their Fluke meters they keep bringing but never plugging in]
ANYWAY. BackAgainLikeBadHair if you're serious about the pre-2004 panel question I know a guy at the Euclid hardware store who's got the original junction box permits from 1999. My uncle helped move his couch today and I saw them on the wall. no joke. I can ask next time I'm down there.
but also you still owe the forum an answer about why you changed the bulb photo between topic 223 and topic 227 so let's not pretend you're above the fray

the twin one