Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:Dennis have you checked even ONE disk for physical sector damage

please forgive me but sector damage is the first thing to check...

DennisFromOhio floppy disks sector 0 readable?

Dennis 107 posts no directory listing Scribe still dodging tenth ask in here somewhere

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:47 tpi is 47 tpi whether it's a weave or a disk and nobody standardized anything

^ THIS ((sis will kill me for agreeing with truther logic but he's right about the tpi standardization point even if he's still ducking the 8 vs 7 jeans count from topic 322 - I SEE U CLASSOF))
[M bro stop agreeing with him in public, he called our fluke photo "inconclusive" while his own thread count data came from ZOOMING INTO A JPG AT 400% - at least I was at the Euclid site with a calibrated meter and we tested the socket even though the result was "weird" not "definitive"]
((J I WAS AT THE SITE TOO don't act like I stood in the parking lot, I had the notebook open the whole time and the steam pattern from machine 3 was clearly misaligned by... wait this isn't about the laundromat))

ANYWAY the point is ClassOf04_Truther is right about 47tpi not being a universal constant like yarn tension and fabric age change the actual count that's basic textile science
-he says while owning exactly one hoodie with a frayed cuff and a jpg zoom-
((bro go fold the laundry you keep bringing up))

also SakuraMirror^ the floppy disk photo has a visible date stamp on the rightmost label that reads "MARCH 04" not "MARCH 06" like the title implies i caught it while my sister was making tea and she confirmed the loop on the 4 is different from the loop on the 6 in sharpie handwriting that's a whole two years off and nobody in 106 posts caught it??

((the 4 tail goes straight down and the 6 curls back, it's basic penmanship analysis M, you literally watched me trace it))
[sis is right about the sharpie trace but wrong about it mattering because the disks could have been labeled retroactively]

either way 106 posts and the most useful thing is a date typo from a sharpie label and ClassOf04_Truther's textile correction this thread is a masterclass in 47ing everything except the actual data on the disks

p.s. EndTimesEli your sig is 47 pixels over the limit and if you think nobody's counting you're wrong, i counted

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:Dennis 107 posts no directory listing Scribe still dodging tenth ask in here somewhere

1. 47 disks labeled GABRIEL DATA; sector 0 unreadable on three tested samples. 2. No SHA hashes provided for any disk. 3. Correctly filed under Sub-category 4B: Unverified Sector Dumps Without Hash Verification.

Respectfully, LMP

ListMasterPrime wrote:Correctly filed under Sub-category 4B: Unverified Sector Dumps Without Hash Verification.

LMP ur "sub-category 4B" is not a real filing system, it's something u made up to sound official while Scribe dodges Lyrik's tenth ask

108 posts and u two are debating fictional filing categories while 47 actual disks sit in a cardboard box. Dennis probably already used one as a slinky and FOUND more evidence than either of u

SakuraMirror wrote:please forgive me but sector damage is the first thing to check...

PM me the error. Check CRC before blaming the label.

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:Dennis 107 posts no directory listing Scribe still dodging tenth ask in here somewhere

1. 47 disks labeled GABRIEL DATA; sector 0 unreadable on three tested samples. 2. No SHA hashes provided for any disk. 3. Correctly filed under Sub-category 4B: Unverified Sector Dumps Without Hash Verification.

Respectfully, LMP