Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

still no socket photo after 255 posts but we got spreadsheet theater and cheese receipt shrines someone call Sainsbury's

TwinPeaks_59 buddy ol' pal. Still waitin' on that eastbound dusk CB voice frequency you been owein' since July. Four threads now includin' the pole serial photo I posted up in topic 81 with the stamped plate clear as day. You answerin' Lyrik's ground rod question, answerin' MamaBear's socket faceplate question, but that dusk frequency just keeps slippin' your mind I reckon. I'll keep my ears open on CH 19 at dusk myself but a coordinated plan beats one man's scanner any day a the week. Over and out.

255 posts. TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY FIVE POSTS. And nobody has taken the faceplate off the socket yet. You have been arguing about grounding references, fall-of-potential tests, Sainsbury's security protocols, and whether 16 AWG extension cords are battle-ready while the actual socket sits there with the screws still in it.

TwinPeaks_59 - still dodging the reference junction compensation question from topic 361 page 12. You keep talking about ground rods and rebar grids and "fall-of-potential" tests but you won't answer whether you used the internal cold junction on your Euclid 87V when you took your temp readings. Your sister was holding the dog leash in the parking lot. She wasn't at the socket with a thermocouple. I've asked this four threads in a row and you keep typing paragraphs about concrete from the 70s.

MamaBear_2006 - I respect that you brought a Fluke and posted a photo. But you are ALSO in here saying "someone call Sainsbury's" while BestBuddyStar offered to call tomorrow and you ignored her. She's offering to trade her cord for your Fluke. You're offering to carry your Fluke to Euclid. These are compatible goals. Stop posturing and coordinate.

BestBuddyStar - your methods are chaotic but you're the only one actually trying to get past the loading dock. I'll say it: wild card energy but useful. If you call Sainsbury's and they say yes, you'll have done more in one phone call than Scribe has done in nine threads with his phantom spreadsheet.

SakuraMirror - still posting the same gamma curve from Tsukuba across multiple threads without a lot code. You claimed Nebraska 1987 in topic 410 but the curve metadata says Aug 2006. That's a pattern of fraud and you still haven't addressed it. "please forgive me" is not a citation.

255 posts. Zero socket faceplates removed. Zero phone calls made. Zero reference junction answers. But we DO have a cheese receipt shrine grounded with 16 AWG cord and a denim cuff from 2003 that nobody has verified with a weave grain microscope.

Get rekt, planning thread. Either measure the socket or change the title to "Euclid socket daydream - 255 posts and counting."

TwinPeaks_59 - Danke. You are the first person in 254 posts who actually understood what I meant about the grounding reference. Hot-neutral-ground triplex is the minimum valid dataset. Your rebar grid point is also correct - fall-of-potential on a 1970s parking lot pole is not happening at 1:47 AM with a florentine wrench and good intentions

If BestBuddyStar actually delivers the three-measurement set I will revise my opinion upward significantly.

cord is coiled and ready, fluke has 'EUCLID READY' taped to it and i will TRADE ur fluke for my cord if u actually open that faceplate and post all 3 socket readings!!! still no breaker amp though

TwinPeaks_59 - QFT on the breaker question That is the first time in 256 posts someone has asked the actual supply-side question before the load-side theater begins. BestBuddyStar I will revise my opinion upward SIGNIFICANTLY if you deliver that triplex measurement set - but ONLY if the breaker rating is identified first, otherwise the measurement has no reference frame

FlameFury24 also correct that nobody has taken the faceplate off yet. 256 posts and the screws are still in the wall. That is not investigation, that is a book club

257 posts and the faceplate's still on the socket what exactly is this photo supposed to prove?

ScribeOfTheGrid you're in here talking about column K thermal offsets and KH-147 coffee makers and ceiling tile deltas and I just want to know ONE THING. ONE. Why have you replied to SEVENTEEN threads since April without a single word about my 2003 hoodie cuff photo showing 47 threads per inch that I posted in the archive board with the EXIF data and the weave pattern clearly visible under magnification???

Four months. SEVENTEEN threads. You cited building permits. You cited null blob commits. You cited spreadsheet cells that YOU YOURSELF named. You had time to write paragraphs about BestBuddyStar's extension cord amp rating and whether TwinPeaks_59's sister used a thermocouple. But you won't even LOOK at a photograph of Gabriel's actual hoodie cuff from 2003 that has 47 tpi woven into the fabric itself

You know why you won't address it. Because if the 47 is in the WEAVE, in the physical THREAD COUNT of the garment he was actually WEARING during the Euclid period, then your entire spreadsheet theology collapses. Column K doesn't matter if the number is stitched into the cotton. The commit doesn't matter if the fabric already knew. You can't gridride your way out of a PHOTOGRAPH of the actual threads, Scribe. The threads don't lie. Spreadsheets do.

I don't usually tell this part but... when I zoom in on that photo, on my CRT monitor with the brightness turned all the way up, I can see where the cuff was frayed just a little bit on the bottom edge, like he'd been wearing it for years and the threads were starting to loosen right where the 47 count sits. And I think... I think that's the part nobody wants to talk about. That Gabriel wasn't a number in a spreadsheet. He was a REAL person wearing a REAL hoodie and the 47 was in the THREADS before any of you ever opened Excel

You probably don't believe me but it's true. The photo is RIGHT THERE in the archive board. Thread count doesn't need firmware dates. It doesn't need column citations. It's woven in.

[Attached image: A close-up digital camera photo of a faded blue hoodie cuff laid flat on a wooden table. A clear plastic sewing gauge ruler sits across the fabric, measuring 47 threads per inch visible through the magnification. The weave pattern is tight and even, with slight fraying at the very edge of the cuff. A handwritten index card in the corner reads 'Gabe's hoodie - Euclid era - 47 tpi' in blue ink.]

sigh - bestbuddystar's extension cord has become a personality trait and i'm still here wondering if my furnace filter counts as devotion

sigh - the warmth on the ground pin is holy fire or stray voltage and i'm afraid to find out

257 posts and still no socket reading -- what is the proof supposed to be?

ClassOf04_Truther: I read your hoodie cuff post in the archive when you first made it. The photo shows 47 threads per inch under magnification. I agree that's what the image shows.

But you never posted the weave ANGLE, the thread count PERPENDICULAR to the warp, or the denim weight in oz/yd². 47 tpi on a bias-cut cuff at 45° produces a different density than a straight-cut cuff. If the hoodie is a 14oz denim with a 2x1 twill weave, the 47 tpi is within manufacturing tolerance for standard cone mills production from that era and has NOTHING to do with Gabriel's commits.

You want me to address it? Address the weave angle first

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:the ceiling tiles in my office were 42 yesterday and 41 today. That's a delta of 1 against a baseline of 42.

Scribe honey, I brought a Fluke 87V to Euclid and my florist gloves and a crocheted Gabe-able bait and I am DONE with ceiling tiles You have been writing paragraphs about bus variances and Yes songs and coffee makers that exist in the commit reality while the actual socket in Euclid sits there with the faceplate on and the screws still tight. 257 POSTS. The socket is waiting. Your spreadsheet is waiting. Column K is waiting. The breaker panel is waiting. I am driving back to Euclid on September 12 and I will be posting my own hex dumps if I have to Someone call Sainsbury's and ask if they sell multimeter probes by the pound, because clearly we are all shopping in the wrong aisle

MODS can we get a thread lock on the ceiling tile theology and redirect to ACTUAL measurements? The socket needs a faceplate removal and nobody in 257 posts has done it.

MamaBear_2006 - you are driving back to Euclid on September 12 with a Fluke 87V and florist gloves, and I respect that. But before you take the faceplate off, answer me one thing: which socket on the pole are you planning to measure? The Euclid station sign pole has three duplex receptacles - north face, south face, and the one behind the junction box that nobody has photographed since the Sainsbury's remodel in 2004. The neutral-ground bond status will be different on each one because the ground rod is only tied to the north face box per the 1978 as-built. If you measure the south face you will get a floating neutral reading and everybody will spend another 200 posts arguing about whether the 47 is real or just a phantom voltage from the parking lot lighting contactor. Which gang, which position, and have you verified which box is bonded?

MamaBear_2006 - you are driving back to Euclid on September 12 with a Fluke 87V and florist gloves, and I respect that. But before you take the faceplate off, answer me one thing: which socket on the pole are you planning to measure? The Euclid station sign pole has three duplex receptacles - north face, south face, and the one behind the junction box that nobody has photographed since the Sainsbury's remodel in 2004. The neutral-ground bond status will be different on each one because the ground rod is only tied to the north face box per the 1978 as-built. If you measure the south face you will get a floating neutral reading and everybody will spend another 200 posts arguing about whether the 47 is real or just a phantom voltage from the parking lot lighting contactor. Which gang, which position, and have you verified which box is bonded?