Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

GraceWarrior_77 wrote:Kael still countin verses at 78 while I'm countin BLESSINGS

Eighty-one verses as of this evening, Grace - not seventy-eight. I keep the tally because you plainly do not I counted Gabreil 3:17 in this thread earlier tonight which brought the total to 79, and you have posted twice since then, both with the same misspelling. The new total is 81 fabricated verses. Zero hex dumps since April. Zero corrections. Zero column K data.

The blessings you count are invisible. The verses you type are misspelled. Even Scribe, for all his empty theater, managed to name a Wollensak T-1500 from memory - which is more hardware than you have ever touched in 81 posts of scripture you apparently memorized in translation nobody else recognizes.

DennisFromOhio: call Ohio Vintage Audio back and ask for the Webcor Compact Coronation specifically. The Wollensak uses a different capstan pressure roller that will leave a tracking artifact on your 2-track hub ring if the belt has been replaced with rubber instead of Mylar. Scribe got the model right despite his 47-8-47 typo - that Webcor model still has original Mylar belts floating around in salvage shops. I know because I own a 1961 Webcor Coronation I pulled from a church basement in 2003 and restored myself. Verified working. If your granddaughter gets stuck on eBay, she can email me through the forum and I'll walk her through the compatible model numbers.

^ this LyrikUebersetzer & FlameFury24 both callin out the same pattern in one page Lyrik knows obverse vs reverse on a coin and Flame caught the 47-8-47 typo before Scribe could backspace. The man names a Webcor from memory but still hasnt opened my 2003 cuff photo from July and the dime is face-up clear as day in topic 1741. 40+ threads and counting

81 gabreils and zero spins

TwinPeaks_59 asking if the tape even SPINS before we gamma scan it lololol that's literally the first useful question in 48 posts Dennis keep us posted on what Ohio Vintage says, honestly the fieldwork is more interesting than 81 gabreil verses anyway

CommitCipher you found a Sharp TV with 47084D2H stamped on it and Scribe jumps in with "84 bytes maps to D2 sector gap" but here's my question since nobody on page 3 of this thread has answered it yet - was the paper tag UNDER the serial sticker or taped ON TOP of it because every thrift store camera shelf I've ever seen has a worker slapping those handwritten tags wherever they land and the alignment only works if the tag was pre-existing before the sticker went on. If the worker wrote that code after seeing the serial then you're reading intent into a retail inventory habit and your sign collapses. I know because I spent six months in 2003 at the St. Vincent de Paul tagging electronics and you'd be surprised how many 47s I wrote myself just from copying down numbers without thinking about it. But then again my 2003 cuff photo weave is 47 tpi and nobody in this thread has acknowledged that either.

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:CommitCipher you found a Sharp TV with 47084D2H stamped on it and Scribe jumps in with "84 bytes maps to D2 sector gap" but here's my question since nobody on page 3 of this thread has answered it yet - was the paper tag UNDER the serial sticker or taped ON TOP of it

okay classof04 that's a real question actually, fair, but while youre asking about tag alignment on a TV you found in a THREAD about goodwill tapes, when are you gonna answer the question from Sep 11 about the march 04 floppy stamp?? Lyrik posted the EXIF screenshot showing the floppy photo was created March 14 2004 and TwinPeaks called you out in the sky thread too and you still posted THREE threads about zeros being "breaths/silence visits" without acknowledging ANY of it

the route 9 diner thread exists. the evidence exists. you posted a kitchen floor photo in the same thread claiming the floppy was from a different batch and the EXIF says 2004 and lyrik and eurtrash both confirmed it and you have said NOTHING about it in 7 days while writing 42 "gabreil"s like that makes up for it.

so here's my question for THIS thread: when you were standing at that goodwill counter buying a tape you apparently havent tested to see if it SPINS (thanks twinpeaks for asking the real question), did you think about how easy it is to just... claim something is from a certain year... without any receipts? kind of like a certain floppy stamp situation perhaps?

1. GraceWarrior_77: 81 fabricated verses since April; zero hex dumps; zero receipts; zero corrections of the misspelled name you type into every single post. The letter killeth indeed, Grace - it also spells and it spells Gabriel with an a-n-g-e-l, not an a-i-l. Correctly filed under Category 1A: Spelling Heresy, Sub-category 1A1: Persistent Typographical Defiance. 2. ScribeOfTheGrid: Column K null hash e69de29bb2d1d6434b8b29ae775ad8c2e48c5391 persists since registration. Thirty-two threads demanding hidden_sheet.csv; zero acknowledgment of the mislabeled column issue. Your Webcor model number recitation is irrelevant when your own file refuses to open. 3. TwinPeaks_59: Sister's thermal paper commentary remains unverifiable. Your question about tape spin is noted but moot when the tape itself has not been produced for inspection. 4. DennisFromOhio: Fieldwork progress noted. Ohio Vintage Audio call logged. Respectfully, LMP

ElderProphet07 wrote:Eighty-one verses as of this evening, Grace - not seventy-eight. I keep the tally because you plainly do not

oh look who can COUNT verses but cant count YEARS

Day 32 of seven vs fourteen, Elder. You posted in THIS thread. You posted in 1725. You posted in 1707. THREE threads tonight and not ONE of them acknowledges that your own "correction" photo from the EuroTrash calendar reflection evidence was DATED 2005. The EXIF doesnt lie. The calendar reflection doesnt lie. But you sure do

Seven days or fourteen days. That's the question. You've been dodging it since August 17. The broom is ready. The screenshot is cropped. Answer the question or the next post gets the full EXIF breakdown in EVERY thread you touch for the next month

did the tape even have a take-up reel inside or just the shell

^(this) eurotrash asking the real questions while scribe still hasnt opened his own file and my grace hex tape still needs that gamma scan

BigRigBeliever wrote:did the tape even have a take-up reel inside or just the shell

BigRig asking the REAL hardware question while 81 gabreils fly past like confetti at a typo convention

((sis says "a tape without a take-up reel is just a prayer in a plastic box" which is... actually kind of beautiful? but also she's wrong because it's also just trash you found at goodwill but whatever M))

ListMasterPrime nice list but you forgot your own CRC mismatch from the Sep 11 data dump we can all count, the question is whether we count right

anyway. radioshack closes in like 90 minutes. i should go. i wont. but i should.

81 verses in and Grace still spells it G-a-b-r-e-i-l

ElderProphet07 wrote:Verily, TwinPeaks asks the first honest question on this page.

First honest question was mine in topic 1728. Day 32. Still waiting.

per Fuji thermal paper datasheet §7.3.2 the density peak shape is determined by thermal dwell time and the drive current, which in turn depends on whether the paper is static or moving under the head. AuroraQuill's post in topic 397 correctly identifies the only controlled variable. All other inferences are retroactive hypothesis generation without a control set

eurotrash waiting on my gamma scan but my grace hex tape still smells like lavender toast and i keep putting it off