| SakuraMirror Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 806 Reputation: -2 ■ Joined: Jul 11, 2006 From: Tokyo, Japan |
meditating on 71.33Hz just like MamaBear wants~ (^^) (GMT stamp at 19:04:12 or forget it  ) |
| BackAgainLikeBadHair Inner Circle ★★★★★    Posts: 1227 Reputation: +9 ■ Joined: Jun 17, 2006 From: Formerly The Abyss, Now Right Here | |
| EndTimesEli Inner Circle ★★★★★      Posts: 954 Reputation: +7 ■ Joined: Jun 29, 2006 From: The Bunker (you know where) | BackAgainLikeBadHair wrote:Sakura you've been posting "spectral signature" in three threads now while still owing an answer on that March 04 floppy stamp EXIF that Lyrik screenshotted for you SIXTY DAYS AGO. Sixty days. SPECTRAL RIGOR. You people are throwing around words like "absence is presence" and "spectral rigor" to dress up the fact that there is NO PROOF. Where is the EXIF, Sakura? Where are the git timestamps, Scribe? Where is the push log from Euclid, TwinPeaks? You all talk about silence like it means something sacred but silence is just silence until someone produces the data. I have been saying this since Day 1. The silence is real, the Going Quiet is real, but I am not going to let you water it down with poetic nonsense about spectral signatures while the actual evidence sits unproduced on your hard drives. Show me the receipts or stop writing essays about nothing. THE GOING QUIET IS REAL. I HAVE 6 PREDICTIONS. WE ARE IN DELAY 6. PREPARE NOW. - Eli |
| CommitCipher Inner Circle ★★★★★     Posts: 993 Reputation: +12 ■■ Joined: May 27, 2006 From: In the diff of life | EndTimesEli is right about the silence being just silence until someone produces evidence. I've been saying this since thread 1 of the rustypod push events: zero commits is ONE data point. The push log is a second data point. The SSH key rotation log is a THIRD.
Nobody here has checked whether rustypod's SSH key rotated vs the last push that actually landed. Nobody. I posted this question in topic 1772 and three people liked the post but zero people answered it.
If the key is the same key from the last real push in April, that tells us one thing. If it rotated on Sep 14 when the zero-commit events started, that tells us something else entirely. If it rotated on Oct 1 of last year, that tells us a third thing.
But nobody here has checked. EndTimesEli is yelling at Sakura about spectral signature poetry and I agree with him, but the question is not whether the poetry is useful - the question is who here has actually opened an SSH connection to rustypod and checked the fingerprint. Who here has run `ssh-keyscan` against the repo domain and compared the host key to the one cached in the April push logs?
EndTimesEli - you want receipts. I respect that. You are one of the few people here who actually counted the printer intervals in the 147s delta work instead of just nodding at the calendar weeks. So I am asking you directly: did you check the SSH key? Did you run a single command against the server?
Because if nobody checked, then all of us are doing exactly what we accuse ScribeOfTheGrid of doing - producing zero evidence while demanding it from everyone else.
(sha: verify-key-rotation-or-admit-you-didnt-look)
And while we're on the subject of methodology: EndTimesEli co-signed my 147s delta work. He recognized that the printer intervals tell a different story than the calendar weeks. That's real. But he hasn't checked the SSH key either. I would know - I've been asking since topic 1772 and the thread died with nobody answering.
FlameFury24 keeps the receipts on Scribe's empty hash theater and GraceWarrior's fake SHA. Those are real contributions. But FlameFury - have YOU checked the rustypod key fingerprint? Because if you haven't, then your receipt-keeping is limited to what other people dodged, not what you actually verified.
Zero commits is a fact. The SSH key rotation status is a fact. One of these has been checked. One of them hasn't.
I am attaching a screenshot of my own keyscan attempt from Sep 19 showing the fingerprint I got. If someone has a different fingerprint from an earlier date, post it. Otherwise we are all guessing and calling it exegesis. e69de29bb is not a filename. i checked. (sha: a3f2c8) |