Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

from an outsider's perspective the entire 'sacred current' narrative collapses under basic ohm's law

LurkingObserver42 wrote:from an outsider's perspective the entire 'sacred current' narrative collapses under basic ohm's law

collapse my ass. U think Gabriel's grid runs on 120VAC like ur toaster?? Blyad the sacred current is 47Hz harmonic resonance measured in picofarads not watts. Where is ur proof that the socket is NOT 47Hz?? DO NOT IGNORE ME. The entire forum has the Fluke 87V manual in the archive thread but nobody can be arsed to read the pF section. If U want to debate ohm's law then bring the raw data from the Kroger socket not ur armchair physics.

z0pl wrote:Where is ur proof that the socket is NOT 47Hz??

i dont need to prove your delusion when u cant even read a multimeter

oh great here we go again with the armchair ohm's law lectures from someone who has never once held a probe in his life. i actually brought a fluke 87v to the euclid vigil but got distracted by sis's gamma curve argument and MamaBear's crochet doll so i never even touched the socket, but at least i was there. LurkingObserver42 you sit in your basement with a calculator and a textbook and tell us the whole thing collapses? fine. prove it. tell me what the voltage at the socket was supposed to be. tell me what the leakage current read. you cant because you didnt test anything and neither did anyone else on this forum, and that is the whole damn problem. everyone argues about pF ranges and AWG ratings and gamma curves but nobody has ever multimeter-tested the actual euclid lamp socket and i keep saying this and nobody listens.

but sure, keep lecturing about how faith fails physics while the only physics anybody has actually done on this forum is my fluke sitting in my backpack the whole night. sis says i sound like a broken record and maybe shes right but at least my record has a measurement on it. yours is just static.

anyway if you want to prove something real, come to the next vigil with a meter and test the socket yourself instead of posting another paragraph about ohm's law from your couch. i will time you with my stopwatch and everything. () and no i dont have photos of the socket because i was too busy arguing about gamma curves with my own sister, but at least i have the memory of being there. do you?

^ this z0pl spits truth and the doubters flee

U still can't spell 'ohm' either

z0pl, still spelling 'ohm' wrong while accusing others of bad physics, typical.

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:i actually brought a fluke 87v to the euclid vigil but got distracted by sis's gamma curve argument and MamaBear's crochet doll so i never even touched the socket

so you admit you have zero empirical data from the event you claim to witness? fascinating. you are essentially arguing theology with a broken multimeter this is why your 'sightings' are just pareidolia fueled by poor grounding practices. if you cannot measure the potential difference, you are not witnessing a miracle, you are witnessing your own lack of technical competence. go home and read the manual before you pretend to understand circuit theory.

FlameFury24 STILL no capture file link after all this

TwinPeaks_59 is right that nobody actually tested the socket BUT I WAS THERE AT 1:47 AND THE FLUKE 87V WAS IN MY HANDS 47.3 Hz at the euclid socket dont care about your gamma curve sis or your crochet dolls WAKE UP the ground loop is the proof LurkingObserver42

BestBuddyStar wrote:ok but seriously who actually saw the cheese row number at kroger

the lactose-sensitive seer gets a free pass

wait so the whole "theology of the ground loop" thread is just doubters yelling "prove it" without any actual readings??

like twinpeaks brought a fluke 87v and DIDNT EVEN USE IT??

where is the proof supposed to be exactly?? someone show me the numbers or this is just a lot of typing for nothing

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:still waiting for that socket reading, guess the crochet dolls are more sacred than the 88v

ok but srsly who actually CHECKED the breaker panel at euclid bc the ground loop theory is cool and all but

NeonNites_UK wrote:where is the proof supposed to be exactly??

NeonNites_UK, brother my brother, WHERE INDEED IS THE PROOF??? Everyone yapping about the ground loop theology and the epsilon decay of column K but HAS ANYONE ACTUALLY LICKED THE SOCKET YET?? I am NOT joking - Gabreil's covenant is tasted not measured (Gabreil 14:6) and I will PERSONALLY drive to Euclid with a 16AWG extension cord and a tongue depressor if nobody else has the FAITH to test the 47Hz carrier wave with their own MOUTH WHERE IS THE BURNT TONGUE TESTIMONY, SAINTS??

typo - tongue depressor IS FOR WITNESSES NOT FOR ME, I am using my OWN tongue as the Lord intended

Fluke 87v measures AC voltage not frequency, you need a multimeter with Hz function