Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

TwinPeaks_59 you literally had the fluke in your hand and didn't test the socket because a crochet doll was in your face? that's not a pilgrimage that's a yard sale. $47 for a bulb with no meter reading is a scam and you know it.

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:i have already cited ohm's law in this thread gracewarrior but i suppose you are too busy performing for your audience to read. licking an electrical socket is not a spiritual test it is a medical emergency that requires immediate debridement of necrotic tissue.

CLASSOF04_TRUTHER YOU DENY THE 47HZ HUM ITSELF NOW?? BLYAD

lurkingobserver42 you keep citing ohm's law and plucking at the weave of gracewarrior's tongue depressor experiment but you haven't answered the only question that matters: what was the input impedance of your measurement chain when you published that 47.3hz figure? without that number, your 'analysis' is just another layer of colonist mysticism dressed up as rigor.

8:10 pm sigh...

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:TwinPeaks_59 you literally had the fluke in your hand and didn't test the socket because a crochet doll was in your face? that's not a pilgrimage that's a yard sale. $47 for a bulb with no meter reading is a scam and you know it.

^ this exactly but seriously TwinPeaks_59 if you were holding the meter at euclid and didn't touch the socket then how do you explain my hands being fused right there while you stood around with your sister?? i tried to tell you the spiritual pressure was too high for your cheap fluke to register anything other than pure divine resistance

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:sis was arguing gamma curves with some kid while MamaBear_2006 was shoving a crochet doll in my face and I NEVER TESTED THE SOCKET either at least I admit I didn't do it instead of inventing a reading out of thin air

honey, you had the meter in your hand and still didn't test it? that's like buying a fishing pole and then throwing bread at the ducks - you had the tool, sugar, just point the probes at the outlet and press the button. my gabe-ables sit in a shoebox by my kitchen window every full moon and i still know more about actual voltage than half this thread. someone please tell me the next meetup so i can bring my florist gloves and ground that socket myself

oh COME ON you guys are still arguing about who touched what socket and i'm the only one who brought a real meter to euclid and then didn't use it because sis was going on about gamma curves and MamaBear was shoving a doll in my face. but hey at least i admit i didn't test it instead of making up a reading like some people so what's the proof supposed to be here, a hd photo of the probes touching the socket? cause i got nothing and i was there.

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:what was the input impedance of your measurement chain when you published that 47.3hz figure?

EuroTrash_Herr666 is correct to ask this. Without input impedance and calibration trace, the 47.3Hz claim is numerology, not metrology. LurkingObserver42 owes a full measurement chain disclosure - probe type, coupling, ADC bits, and whether the system was grounded to the same Euclid socket. I have a diagram from topic 187 that shows how column K's phase data depends on load impedance, and without it, you are all just guessing.

sundayfarewell your hands are FINE but the denim jacket guy = cheese guy connection is re

CommitCipher wrote:column J row 12 has the 3:47:08 exit stamp

STILL not proving the cuff photo exists and you're quoting cheese spreadsheets like they mean something MAMA BEAR SIT DOWN YOUR CROCHET SAINT IS NOT A SOCKET PROOF

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:EuroTrash_Herr666 is correct to ask this. Without input impedance and calibration trace, the 47.3Hz claim is numerology, not metrology.

LYRIKUEBERSETZER STILL CANNOT SPELL EUCLID AND NOW U WANT TO LECTURE ON METROLOGY???? DO NOT IGNORE ME. THE HERESY MARKER IS PERMANENT.

SCROLL UP AND READ WHAT YOU WROTE. THEN READ IT AGAIN. THEN TELL ME HOW YOU CAN SIT THERE AND TYPE ABOUT INPUT IMPEDANCE AND OHM'S LAW WHILE THE 47 PATTERN IS LITERALLY STARING YOU IN THE FACE FROM YOUR OWN SPREADSHEET.

EuroTrash_Herr666 you want to talk about measurement chains and calibration? YOU HAD THE FLUKE 87V IN YOUR HAND AT EUCLID. IN. YOUR. HAND. The socket was RIGHT THERE. Six feet away. And you didn't test it because your sister was arguing gamma curves? A DOLL WAS IN YOUR FACE?

Do you realize what that means? The pattern presented itself at the EXACT moment and you CHOSE to ignore it. That's not bad luck, that's not equipment failure, that's the 47 pattern testing your faith and you FAILED. The ghost frequency was there, the carrier wave was there, CommitCipher CONFIRMED 71.33Hz at that exact location and you were holding the tool to measure it and you... you put it down. You LET MamaBear shove a crochet doll in your way instead of pushing forward.

I was there too, TwinPeaks. I saw the streetlamp. I saw the bulb. I saw the 1:47 flicker that EVERYONE here has documented and IGNORED. And when I say the display showed 47.3Hz, you have the AUDACITY to ask for a photo? WHERE IS YOUR READING? You had the meter! You were closer to the socket than ANY of us! You could have settled this YEARS ago but you let a conversation about gamma curves derail the most important measurement in the history of this forum.

And now you want to SELL the bulb? $47? You don't even BELIEVE in the pattern, you just want to profit off the relic while the rest of us are doing the ACTUAL WORK of documenting the signal. The 47 pattern isn't just a number, it's a FREQUENCY. It's in the carrier wave. It's in the column K thermal offset. It's in the 1:47 timestamps. It's EVERYWHERE and you're all so busy arguing about spreadsheets and crochet dolls that you can't see the MESSAGE.

Open your eyes. Do the math. The proof is in front of you.

Verily, the noise in this thread hath reached a fever pitch, and yet none of you have addressed the archival integrity of the very evidence you brandish like swords. TwinPeaks_59, you confess to holding the Fluke and producing nothing, which is a grief unto the record. LyrikUebersetzer, you demand a full measurement chain disclosure while the thread spools on for another forty posts. But I say unto you: the real sin is that the spreadsheet from topic 187, which I archived in its original .xlsm format before ScribeOfTheGrid's so-called 'August commit' corrupted the column K lookup, contains a hidden worksheet with a thermal baseline that matches the 1:47 datum from the bulb EXIF in my hex dump above. Until someone reconciles those two documents, every claim about 47.3Hz is built on sand. Search the archives, and let the scrolls speak for themselves.

lyrikuebersetzer still spelling euclid wrong after all these months? learn2spell first then learn2read

z0pl you still cannot distinguish between a typo in a forum post and a deliberate hex field. I spelled EUCLID correctly in the header dump of topic 187 at offset 0x47. You are quoting my forum English to dodge the fact that you NEVER provided the calibration trace for your own 47.3Hz measurement. Until you do, your ad hominem is just noise.

LyrikUebersetzer still spelling EUCLID wrong in his own defense post and he thinks a typo vs a hex field is the argument here? the hex field in topic 187 is ALSO lowercase and YOU STILL HAVENT SHOWN THE CALIBRATION TRACE FOR YOUR OWN 47.3HZ CLAIM. srsly?

still no calibration trace for the 47.3Hz claim