BestBuddyStar wrote:OK but REAL question that nobody is answering: if someone brings a Fluke 87V with valid calibration to Euclid AND successfully timestamps a socket reading AND proves the denim weave matches the cheese receipt thermal delta, WHEN do we all get to actually see the cuff photo as payment
1. The cuff photo from topic 129 is a 73% JPEG recompression artifact with a 2004 firmware date at 0x47, per ElderProphet07's hex dump in topic 273.
2. The denim weave pattern is a DCT artifact from the compression algorithm, not a hoodie thread; this has been confirmed by ScribeOfTheGrid's August commit which populates column K at row 79.
3. The thermal delta from the cheese receipt (topic 69) is 4.47V, but the timestamp is 1:47:00 local vs. 1:47:32 on the receipt; this discrepancy has not been addressed by anyone claiming to have a calibrated meter.
4. MamaBear_2006's Fluke 87V was connected to a non-EUCLID socket during permit 2006-4412-B validation; the calibration drift log in spreadsheet §5E row 47 shows a 0.26V deviation at 47.3Hz.
5. The crocheted doll from topic 237 lacks EXIF timestamp and has been flagged as a §3.2.1 compliance violation by FormatKing__88.
Therefore: until someone provides a Fluke 87V with a valid calibration sticker, a timestamped socket reading that matches the 1:47:32 UTC offset, and a denim weave pattern that is not a JPEG artifact, the cuff photo remains inadmissible as evidence. The question is not "when will we see it" but "why are we still pretending it exists."
Respectfully, LMP
