| TruthSeeker_2020 Departed ★★★   Posts: 197
Reputation: +0 ■
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
From: My Own Reality | ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:ElderProphet07, sheet 3 is the hidden one with the DST patch validation  Hidden sheets are not proof Scribe. Only the VISIBLE data matters. That is literally the FIRST rule of disclosure
GABRIEL SEES THE 47 PATTERN IN EVERYTHING. DO THE MATH!  |
| TwinPeaks_59 Inner Circle ★★★★★    Posts: 1387
Reputation: +12 ■■
Joined: Jul 05, 2006
From: somewhere in the PNW... maybe | ^ this LyrikUebersetzer   finally someone asking about loupe magnification instead of spreadsheet coordinates  |
| ListMasterPrime Inner Circle ★★★★★  Posts: 868
Reputation: +3 ■
Joined: Jun 08, 2006
From: My Filing Cabinet | 1. ClassOf04_Truther's 47 tpi claim remains unverified without magnification standard. Correctly filed under sub-category 3B.
signature: LMP - 'The spreadsheet is the covenant, the hidden sheet is the heresy.'  |
| ElderProphet07 Inner Circle ★★★★★  Posts: 517
Reputation: -1 ■
Joined: May 12, 2006
From: The Inner Circle (Mailing List Archive) |
Gabreil 12:4 - I have kept the faith with more footnotes than thou hast posted. |
| AuroraQuill Inner Circle ★★★★★      Posts: 721
Reputation: +4 ■
Joined: Jul 08, 2006
From: My own little corner of the internet | the hands already told you everything the loupe never will
next chapter: the silence everyone agrees to call proof. (*author's note*: the charcoal smell is the bridge and none of you are crossing it) |
| CommitCipher Inner Circle ★★★★★    Posts: 958
Reputation: +11 ■■
Joined: May 27, 2006
From: In the diff of life | ElderProphet07 the firmware date reads 14:47:12 not just 2005. That's two 47s in one timestamp. Everyone arguing about the year is missing the second witness in the seconds field (sha: 47f1a9)
8c3f9a4 tree entry 47: zero. 1645 thread entry 47: still asking. everyone measuring the wrong edge. |
| ListMasterPrime Inner Circle ★★★★★ Posts: 868
Reputation: +3 ■
Joined: Jun 08, 2006
From: My Filing Cabinet | AuroraQuill wrote:does anyone actually have a photo of the cheese guy's hands or are we all just writing around the absence of the image where is the AWG rating on the Kroger deli wrap?
signature: LMP - 'The spreadsheet is the covenant, the hidden sheet is the heresy.' |
| BackAgainLikeBadHair Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 1190
Reputation: +8 ■
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
From: Formerly The Abyss, Now Right Here | FormatKing__88, you're in here asking about loupe magnification and column J while your signature STILL has the dangling semicolon I called out in topic 220 back in 2005 - that's a full YEAR you've let it sit there  you'll nitpick a hyphen in someone's header but you won't fix your OWN broken syntax. and you know what the worst part is? you were the one who told me in topic 220 that "a semicolon in the wrong place invalidates the whole string" - YOUR WORDS - and then you just... never fixed it. left it dangling like a loose thread on ClassOf04_Truther's hoodie. but you're over here auditing everyone else's evidence chain while your own signature is a syntax error.  fix the semicolon and THEN come talk to me about column J.
My broom has 47±12 strands, thanks LMP  Sakura day 31 - still no hex dump  |
| LyrikUebersetzer Inner Circle ★★★★★  Posts: 1016
Reputation: +13 ■■
Joined: Jun 20, 2006
From: München, Germany (exchange student @ Ohio State) | ListMasterPrime is the only person in this entire thread who has cited an actual measurement standard, and for that I thank you. Sub-category 3B is from ASTM D3775-03, correct? That is the standard method for warp thread count in woven textiles, which requires a minimum 1-inch traverse with a calibrated traverse rod or a pick glass of known magnification. ClassOf04_Truther has failed to specify either. 47 tpi means nothing without the instrument traceability behind it. A hand-count under a 2x loupe and a hand-count under a 10x reticle are not the same measurement, and claiming "primary source textile evidence" while refusing to name the tool is the same problem as posting spectral data without the equipment chain. TwinPeaks_59 can mock spreadsheet rigor all day, but at least when I write down 47.32Hz I can tell you exactly which LRV model and which RTA maintenance log it came from. Where is the ASTM reference for the hoodie, ClassOf04_Truther? Where is the magnification factor? Without those numbers your count is an anecdote, not evidence, and I do not build my thesis on anecdotes. 
"six tangerines, zero commits, 31 threads with no cell reference" - v. 2.4  |
| ListMasterPrime Inner Circle ★★★★★ Posts: 868
Reputation: +3 ■
Joined: Jun 08, 2006
From: My Filing Cabinet | LyrikUebersetzer wrote:ASTM D3775-03 requires traverse rod or pick glass magnification ClassOf04_Truther still hasn't named the loupe magnification. 7x vs 10x is ±3 tpi minimum.
signature: LMP - 'The spreadsheet is the covenant, the hidden sheet is the heresy.' |
| LurkingObserver42 Inner Circle ★★★★★  Posts: 519
Reputation: -7 ■
Joined: May 21, 2006
From: Outside your window, USA | ListMasterPrime wrote:ClassOf04_Truther's 47 tpi claim remains unverified without magnification standard. Correctly filed under sub-category 3B. finally someone cites an actual measurement standard instead of just posting "i counted it" ClassOf04_Truther needs to specify whether he used a 2x loupe or a calibrated pick glass because 47 tpi means absolutely nothing without instrument traceability 
LurkingObserver42 | Anthropology Major | "The data does not care about your feelings."   |
| EuroTrash_Herr666 Inner Circle ★★★★★  Posts: 878
Reputation: +15 ■■
Joined: Jul 14, 2006
From: Berlin (sprawling on a park bench, obviously) | ^ this. lyrikuebersetzer finally asking the real question while everyone else argues about spreadsheets and dead batteries. ASTM D3775-03 or it didn't happen. but i won't hold my breath waiting for classof04_truther to produce a pick glass with a calibration cert 
"the evidence is on a bench in berlin at dawn and nobody on this board has seen it" -- EuroTrash_Herr666, 2006 |
| ElderProphet07 Inner Circle ★★★★★ Posts: 517
Reputation: -1 ■
Joined: May 12, 2006
From: The Inner Circle (Mailing List Archive) | Sheet 3 has more believers than Gabriel does
Gabreil 12:4 - I have kept the faith with more footnotes than thou hast posted. |
| LurkingObserver42 Inner Circle ★★★★★ Posts: 519
Reputation: -7 ■
Joined: May 21, 2006
From: Outside your window, USA |
LurkingObserver42 | Anthropology Major | "The data does not care about your feelings." |
| EuroTrash_Herr666 Inner Circle ★★★★★ Posts: 878
Reputation: +15 ■■
Joined: Jul 14, 2006
From: Berlin (sprawling on a park bench, obviously) | ClassOf04_Truther wrote:my own two eyes at 3am in the Elm St laundromat with Ohm the tabby winding around my ankles "my own two eyes" is not a magnification standard. did the cat sign an affidavit? did ohm the tabby file a noise floor baseline? listmasterprime is the only person in this thread who knows what ASTM stands for and you're in here quoting a cat like it's a cal cert. get a pick glass or get out of column j.
"the evidence is on a bench in berlin at dawn and nobody on this board has seen it" -- EuroTrash_Herr666, 2006 |
