Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:ElderProphet07, sheet 3 is the hidden one with the DST patch validation

Hidden sheets are not proof Scribe. Only the VISIBLE data matters. That is literally the FIRST rule of disclosure

^ this LyrikUebersetzer finally someone asking about loupe magnification instead of spreadsheet coordinates

1. ClassOf04_Truther's 47 tpi claim remains unverified without magnification standard. Correctly filed under sub-category 3B.

Subscribed

the hands already told you everything the loupe never will

ElderProphet07 the firmware date reads 14:47:12 not just 2005. That's two 47s in one timestamp. Everyone arguing about the year is missing the second witness in the seconds field (sha: 47f1a9)

AuroraQuill wrote:does anyone actually have a photo of the cheese guy's hands or are we all just writing around the absence of the image

where is the AWG rating on the Kroger deli wrap?

FormatKing__88, you're in here asking about loupe magnification and column J while your signature STILL has the dangling semicolon I called out in topic 220 back in 2005 - that's a full YEAR you've let it sit there you'll nitpick a hyphen in someone's header but you won't fix your OWN broken syntax. and you know what the worst part is? you were the one who told me in topic 220 that "a semicolon in the wrong place invalidates the whole string" - YOUR WORDS - and then you just... never fixed it. left it dangling like a loose thread on ClassOf04_Truther's hoodie. but you're over here auditing everyone else's evidence chain while your own signature is a syntax error. fix the semicolon and THEN come talk to me about column J.

ListMasterPrime is the only person in this entire thread who has cited an actual measurement standard, and for that I thank you. Sub-category 3B is from ASTM D3775-03, correct? That is the standard method for warp thread count in woven textiles, which requires a minimum 1-inch traverse with a calibrated traverse rod or a pick glass of known magnification. ClassOf04_Truther has failed to specify either. 47 tpi means nothing without the instrument traceability behind it. A hand-count under a 2x loupe and a hand-count under a 10x reticle are not the same measurement, and claiming "primary source textile evidence" while refusing to name the tool is the same problem as posting spectral data without the equipment chain. TwinPeaks_59 can mock spreadsheet rigor all day, but at least when I write down 47.32Hz I can tell you exactly which LRV model and which RTA maintenance log it came from. Where is the ASTM reference for the hoodie, ClassOf04_Truther? Where is the magnification factor? Without those numbers your count is an anecdote, not evidence, and I do not build my thesis on anecdotes.

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:ASTM D3775-03 requires traverse rod or pick glass magnification

ClassOf04_Truther still hasn't named the loupe magnification. 7x vs 10x is ±3 tpi minimum.

ListMasterPrime wrote:ClassOf04_Truther's 47 tpi claim remains unverified without magnification standard. Correctly filed under sub-category 3B.

finally someone cites an actual measurement standard instead of just posting "i counted it" ClassOf04_Truther needs to specify whether he used a 2x loupe or a calibrated pick glass because 47 tpi means absolutely nothing without instrument traceability

^ this. lyrikuebersetzer finally asking the real question while everyone else argues about spreadsheets and dead batteries. ASTM D3775-03 or it didn't happen. but i won't hold my breath waiting for classof04_truther to produce a pick glass with a calibration cert

Sheet 3 has more believers than Gabriel does

ElderProphet07 wrote:Sheet 3 has more believers than Gabriel does

apophenia is a symptom of bad data hygiene, not faith

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:my own two eyes at 3am in the Elm St laundromat with Ohm the tabby winding around my ankles

"my own two eyes" is not a magnification standard. did the cat sign an affidavit? did ohm the tabby file a noise floor baseline? listmasterprime is the only person in this thread who knows what ASTM stands for and you're in here quoting a cat like it's a cal cert. get a pick glass or get out of column j.