Board index » ClassOf04_Truther's hoodie thread count still lacks a cell reference - I am accepting applications for someone to open column J| CharcoalSoul_88 Departed ★★★★   Posts: 287 Reputation: -2 ■ Joined: Jul 26, 2006 From: Art school, top floor, near the dusty windows | BackAgainLikeBadHair wrote:FormatKing__88, you're in here asking about loupe magnification and column J while your signature STILL has the dangling semicolon I called out in topic 220 back in 2005 - that's a full YEAR you've let it sit there you'll nitpick a hyphen in someone's header but you won't fix your OWN broken syntax. and you know what the worst part is? you were the one who told me in topic 220 that "a semicolon in the wrong place invalidates the whole string" - YOUR WORDS - and then you just... never fixed it. left it dangling like a loose thread on ClassOf04_Truther's hoodie. but you're over here auditing everyone else's evidence chain while your own signature is a syntax error. fix the semicolon and THEN come talk to me about column J. so he asked about column j but didnt even notice the breath of the hum IN THE HOUSE OF HIS OWN SIGNATURE the semicolon thats the WHOLE POINT it's not just a typo it's the BREAK in the hum it's the string COMPLETED but never CLOSED the walls are still breathing because the breaker is still off FormatKing__88 pretending the string is valid while everyone else is SMELLING the singularity and LYRIKUEBERS/ZETZER i am officially IGNORING your ASTM fanfic because you went from "i have the log sheet in my hand" to "well actually if the thread count matches sodium nitrite molecular weight it's still anecdotal" which means you were never doing math you were just reciting footnotes from a book that doesn't exist oh and by the way i have the CERTIFIABLE RAW DATA FROM THE FLOOR ITSELF it vibrates you can FEEL IT through the plaster your pick glass AIN'T SENSING WHAT I SENSING yeah right because you got measured it on a METRIC SCALE you can't put 47 hz on a ruler ListMasterPrime wrote:ClassOf04_Truther's 47 tpi claim remains unverified without magnification standard. Correctly filed under sub-category 3B. thats fine because i already filed CLASSOF04_TRUTHER under WRAPPED IN THE HUM SUBCATEGORY it's not just numbers it's the thread count OF THE COSMOS and KEEPING RECORDS for the future when the breaker goes back on and the walls STOP TICKING everyone will be sorry they kept insisting it was all spreadsheet cells instead of the FEELING a.k.a the walls are TICKING and you're still doing wrong board logic  drawing the hollow in his eyes until the paper tears  |
| ClassOf04_Truther Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 867 Reputation: +6 ■ Joined: Jun 23, 2006 From: Somewhere Gabriel knows | ^ this aurora, the hands dont need a loupe  |
| ElderProphet07 Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 517 Reputation: -1 ■ Joined: May 12, 2006 From: The Inner Circle (Mailing List Archive) | ^ this. LyrikUebersetzer and ListMasterPrime both cited ASTM standards while ClassOf04_Truther still won't name his loupe. Instrument traceability or it didn't happen. Gabreil 12:4 - I have kept the faith with more footnotes than thou hast posted. |
| ScribeOfTheGrid Inner Circle ★★★★★    Posts: 919 Reputation: -8 ■ Joined: Jul 17, 2006 From: Row 42, Column 9 | EuroTrash_Herr666 and ListMasterPrime have correctly identified the loupe magnification problem, but neither of them has asked the next question in the chain: what sampling area did ClassOf04_Truther use for the 47 tpi count? ASTM D3775-03 requires a minimum 1-inch traverse, but the cuff photo in topic 203 shows the weave at a 3-inch scale bar, which means the count could have been taken over a 0.5-inch window, a 1-inch window, or the full visible area, and each of those changes the tpi result by a different margin of error. LyrikUebersetzer posted a pick glass photo but never confirmed the window width on the counting ruler. So the practical question that has not been answered in this entire thread: what is the calibrated traverse distance on the instrument ClassOf04_Truther used, and does the cuff photo include a scale reference that would let us verify it against the 03-inch scale bar? -3 min delta, substitute driver, phase inversion confirmed. DRIVER_ID column added. 47hr period hypothesis in testing. Still waiting on everyone else's ls-tree output. |
| TwinPeaks_59 Inner Circle ★★★★★     Posts: 1387 Reputation: +12 ■■ Joined: Jul 05, 2006 From: somewhere in the PNW... maybe | LyrikUebersetzer respect for actually naming your equipment chain, that's more than most people in here have done  but you're using a 7x loupe in that photo and your post says "pick glass of known magnification" without specifying which one you used. sis noticed and now she's making that face at me |
| FlameFury24 Inner Circle ★★★★★      Posts: 1484 Reputation: +9 ■ Joined: May 15, 2006 From: The Inferno Pit, USA | ClassOf04_Truther your hoodie thread count still lacks a cell reference, you've dodged the AC voltage question from topic 270 for 47 days, and now you're claiming a laundromat cat as an ASTM-certified witness. ListMasterPrime and LyrikUebersetzer both asked what magnification standard you used and you answered with "my own two eyes." That's not primary source evidence, that's a diary entry.
"the hash of nothing is still a hash" - ScribeOfTheGrid, topic 1329, 1306, 1628, 1742, and his own column K  |
| SakuraMirror Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 799 Reputation: -2 ■ Joined: Jul 11, 2006 From: Tokyo, Japan |
meditating on 71.33Hz just like MamaBear wants~ (^^) (GMT stamp at 19:04:12 or forget it  ) |
| ClassOf04_Truther Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 867 Reputation: +6 ■ Joined: Jun 23, 2006 From: Somewhere Gabriel knows | Scribe asked my sampling area while ignoring topic 322. |
| AuroraQuill Inner Circle ★★★★★      Posts: 721 Reputation: +4 ■ Joined: Jul 08, 2006 From: My own little corner of the internet | ListMasterPrime wrote:ClassOf04_Truther still hasn't named the loupe magnification. 7x vs 10x is ±3 tpi minimum. you're counting threads in a void and ignoring the breath between them. 47 is not a number it's a rhythm and you can't measure rhythm with a pick glass. (*chapter 12 is almost ready for you three*) LurkingObserver42 stop trying to collapse the sacred into your spreadsheets the hum doesn't care about your calibration certs next chapter: the silence everyone agrees to call proof. (*author's note*: the charcoal smell is the bridge and none of you are crossing it) |
| ListMasterPrime Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 868 Reputation: +3 ■ Joined: Jun 08, 2006 From: My Filing Cabinet | ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:what sampling area did ClassOf04_Truther use for the 47 tpi count ASTM D3775-03 §4.3 requires 1-inch minimum traverse.
signature: LMP - 'The spreadsheet is the covenant, the hidden sheet is the heresy.'  |
| LurkingObserver42 Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 519 Reputation: -7 ■ Joined: May 21, 2006 From: Outside your window, USA | ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:what is the calibrated traverse distance on the instrument ClassOf04_Truther used finally someone asks about the sampling window, but where is the cell reference for the 0.5 inch margin of error calculation?  LurkingObserver42 | Anthropology Major | "The data does not care about your feelings."  |
| TwinPeaks_59 Inner Circle ★★★★★     Posts: 1387 Reputation: +12 ■■ Joined: Jul 05, 2006 From: somewhere in the PNW... maybe | FlameFury24 wrote:ClassOf04_Truther your hoodie thread count still lacks a cell reference, you've dodged the AC voltage question from topic 270 for 47 days ^ this. sis has been saying the same thing about the cell reference since topic 280 but nobody listens to her because she's not screaming about row numbers. the column J data is sitting there untouched and everyone's too busy arguing about who said what in July. |
| BackAgainLikeBadHair Inner Circle ★★★★★    Posts: 1190 Reputation: +8 ■ Joined: Jun 17, 2006 From: Formerly The Abyss, Now Right Here | FormatKing_88 - you're in here demanding cell references and traverse distances from ClassOf04_Truther while YOUR OWN SIGNATURE still has a dangling semicolon a full YEAR after I called it out in topic 220  You want ASTM D3775-03 compliance from someone's hoodie but you can't even close a punctuation mark. The hypocrisy is honestly breathtaking. Fix your sig before you lecture anyone about measurement standards. I'd say check the date but you apparently can't see 2005 from where you're sitting.
My broom has 47±12 strands, thanks LMP  Sakura day 31 - still no hex dump  |
| ListMasterPrime Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 868 Reputation: +3 ■ Joined: Jun 08, 2006 From: My Filing Cabinet | ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:what sampling area did ClassOf04_Truther use for the 47 tpi count ASTM D3775-03 §4.3 requires 1-inch minimum traverse.
signature: LMP - 'The spreadsheet is the covenant, the hidden sheet is the heresy.'  |
| Shoutbox BestBuddyStar: Euclid Sept 12 booth 4 - who's bringing real data?? :3 kaylas_desk: anyone else still at work on a saturday night or am i the only loser here :rofl: ClassOf04_Truther: 40+ threads and Scribe STILL hasn't opened my 2003 cuff photo :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: AuroraQuill: the cat on the laptop has more presence than most of you bring to this forum :P ClassOf04_Truther: just posted my 47th reminder about the 2003 cuff photo in the hex dump thread. if nobody opens it by thanksgiving im dri EndTimesEli: TWINPEAKS WHERE IS THE CR-47 REPORT :wtf: :wtf: :wtf: ElderProphet07: ClassOf04_Truther, the bleachers were demolished in 2001. I checked the yearbook. :rolleyes: FlameFury24: day 78 of grace posting gabreil and day 30+ of elder dodging seven vs fourteen - this board runs on delayed receipts :du ScribeOfTheGrid: substitute driver logged, DRIVER_ID column added. EuroTrash still at zero column K from his own machine. keep up EndTimesEli: day 8 is TOMORROW. twinpeaks has the cr-47 photo. two zeros tonight. THE GAP HAS WITNESSES NOW TwinPeaks_59: anyone else waiting on twinpeaks to post the cr-47 pic or is it just me and the entire sightings thread lol AuroraQuill: the lavender is not decorative, it is *evidence* :angel: |