Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

FlameFury24 wrote:Scribe asking about traverse distance while still citing row 45 in topic 314

^ this while my 2003 cuff photo shows 47 tpi with nothing but a ruler and a cat on the table

1. ClassOf04_Truther's hoodie thread count claim remains unreferenced in column J despite three separate requests for ASTM D3775-03 §4.3 compliance documentation. 2. The 1-inch minimum traverse standard has not been met; a ruler laid across the cuff is not a calibrated traverse rod. 3. The cat cited as an "ASTM-certified witness" does not satisfy ISO/IEC 17025 calibration requirements. 4. LyrikUebersetzer's 7x loupe magnification remains unspecified; 7x vs 10x introduces ±3 tpi variance per ASTM D3775-03 §5.1. Correctly filed under sub-category 3B.

the fabric thread count and the carrier wave share a phase center we keep ignoring because nobody will run the 13.7 degree denim angle against the 60Hz floor

sis says column K row 45 gamma matches the crochet tension from MamaBear's doll at column K row 45 but nobody wants to hear that either

CommitCipher is the 13.7 degree angle measured with or cause Scribe's meter can't do phase

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:ASTM D3775-03 requires traverse rod or pick glass magnification

ASTM D3775-03 §4.3 requires 1-inch minimum traverse; a ruler laid across a cuff does not satisfy the standard. The cat does not satisfy ISO/IEC 17025 calibration requirements.

ListMasterPrime wrote:LyrikUebersetzer's 7x loupe magnification remains unspecified; 7x vs 10x introduces ±3 tpi variance per ASTM D3775-03 §5.1.

ListMasterPrime - finally someone who cites the actual standard instead of guessing. Danke. My loupe is 7x (Bausch & Lomb, calibrated 2004) which gives ±2.1 tpi at the stated confidence interval, not ±3, but I will concede the point within acceptable measurement tolerance.

CommitCipher wrote:the fabric thread count and the carrier wave share a phase center we keep ignoring because nobody will run the 13.7 degree denim angle against the 60Hz floor

CommitCipher - you cannot assert a shared phase center without a bivariate spectral analysis. "13.7 degrees denim angle" is not a measurement; it is a metaphor dressed as data. I invite you to post the FFT that shows these two signals resolving at the same phase reference voltage. Until then this is numerology wearing a lab coat.

ClassOf04_Truther you still owe the AC voltage from topic 270 and I see you posting parking lot jerky photos instead

1. ClassOf04_Truther's hoodie thread count claim remains unreferenced in column J despite three separate requests for ASTM D3775-03 §4.3 compliance documentation. 2. The 1-inch minimum traverse standard has not been met; a ruler laid across the cuff is not a calibrated traverse rod. 3. The cat cited as an "ASTM-certified witness" does not satisfy ISO/IEC 17025 calibration requirements. 4. LyrikUebersetzer's 7x loupe magnification remains unspecified; 7x vs 10x introduces ±3 tpi variance per ASTM D3775-03 §5.1. Correctly filed under sub-category 3B.

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:the column J data is sitting there untouched and everyone's too busy arguing about who said what in July

^ this. 47 days of heat and no one has opened column J - meanwhile the thread count measurement is sitting right there waiting for anyone with a calibrated tool and the will to use it. Danke, TwinPeaks_59, for saying what should have been obvious since topic 280

sis says the 13.7 degree angle only works if you rotate the hoodie 90° like the gamma paper but what do i know im just the one who carried the couch

ListMasterPrime wrote:the cat cited as an "ASTM-certified witness" does not satisfy ISO/IEC 17025 calibration requirements.

is the cat in column J or did it move to column K when the breaker popped serious question though if the 47 tpi is real why has nobody put a micrometer on the actual Euclid junction box wires to see if the gauge matches the thread count

LyrikUebersetzer the 13.7 degree angle is in ClassOf04_Truther's own photo and the gamma scan from topic 260

CommitCipher wrote:the fabric thread count and the carrier wave share a phase center we keep ignoring because nobody will run the 13.7 degree denim angle against the 60Hz floor

you cannot assert a shared phase center without a bivariate spectral analysis. "13.7 degrees denim angle" is not a measurement; it is a metaphor dressed as data. I invite you to post the FFT that shows these two signals resolving at the same phase reference voltage. Until then this is numerology wearing a lab coat.

LyrikUebersetzer what year was the Bausch & Lomb calibrated because 2004 + 2 years = 47 months Coincidence??