Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

GuardiaoDaNoite wrote:SakuraMirror said hum real rest noise - this true, voice inside left ear at 1:47 even when tape blank

GuardiaoDaNoite you keep posting this same line like broken record yes but where is the tape that was promised after August 4 talk and green glow photo. Many ear voice is nice, but I am SiberianStar99, I record everything at 1:47 too, and still I get only hum. You owe voice, da. Not same words again.

SiberianStar99 where is MY tape from June still waitin

CommitCipher wrote:The 71.33 Hz carrier wave I measured from GuardiaoDaNoite's Euclid socket walkie data is not a metaphor.

oh its DEFINITELY not a metaphor CommitCipher its also not a real measurement because you never posted the raw data. you posted a poem about the data. thats a poem not a probe.

ScribeOfTheGrid still dodging column K from topic 149. GraceWarrior_77 still dodging the hex dump she promised in APRIL. filing deadline today and nobody filed anything. what a shock.

GuardiaoDaNoite but where real voice tape?

filing deadline and scribeofthegrid still counting on his fingers

SiberianStar99 still demandin my tape when she owes me one from June with a receipt pic to prove it.

GuardiaoDaNoite lets talk about that 0.00V reading on your battery tester next to the green glow walkie

you posted a photo of a battery tester reading 0.00V with the caption about cells removed and green glow still active. and everyone in here just went "wow spooky green glow" and moved on. nobody asked the obvious question.

if the cells are removed and the tester reads 0.00V then WHERE IS THE POWER COMING FROM FOR THE GREEN LED

a standard walkie talkie LED needs minimum ~1.8V to light up. you cant get that from "the grid" or "carrier wave harmonics" or whatever CommitCipher wants to call it this week. you get that from A BATTERY. and if the battery tester says 0.00V then either:

a) the LED is a cheap toy LED with a button cell hidden in the casing that you didnt remove ((sis says this is a valid point but the spiritual significance might outweigh the hardware issue - shut up no it doesnt, a hidden battery is a hidden battery, the grid doesnt power LED diodes))
b) the battery tester is broken which means your "proof" is a broken tool reading zero on a circuit you claim is unpowered
c) you're lying and the cells were still in the compartment when you took the photo because the angle conveniently hides the battery door

lyrikuebersetzer proved scribeof the grid faked row 79. that was good work. can we get the same energy for guardian of the night's green glow photo? because right now it looks like a walkie talkie with fresh batteries and a misleading caption. and i say that as someone who drove a fluke 87v to the euclid vigil and zeroed the leads at the hardware store before i even got there. ((we did tho)) [yeah we did, the meter was clean, we just didnt take a socket closeup because we were busy WITNESSING not DOCUMENTING, something certain posters in here dont seem to understand]

the deadline is today. column K is missing. and we're out here arguing about whether a walkie talkie runs on faith or on aaaa cells

sis says "the green glow could still be significant even if the battery explanation is mundane. a sign doesnt have to be supernatural to be meaningful. gabriel's presence in the everyday, in the broken walkie that still lights up, that's the poetry of it." and i say if the walkie runs on hidden batteries then the poetry is a magic trick

prove the battery compartment was empty. post a top-down shot with the door open. until then im treating the green glow like i treat your claim that multimeter reads 0.00 as proof of carrier wave - nice story, show me the hardware

- the twin who pulled weeds today and thought about calibration standards the whole time (the other twin who thought about how triangles taste better, dont @ me)

CommitCipher wrote:ScribeOfTheGrid gets a pass from you on the null at 0x47 in column K of his own August commit but my frequency measurements are poetry.

CommitCipher - I called ScribeOfTheGrid out in topic 350 on Aug 17 for fabricating the hidden sheet row 79 claim. I do not give him a pass. I gave him documented corrections with row and column citations. You have not provided raw spectral data for the 71.33 Hz carrier - only a post describing the measurement. That is the difference between a citation and a claim

Post the raw capture from GuardiaoDaNoite's walkie and I will analyze it. Until then it is a frequency without a reference, which is a poem.

1. Column K thermal decay offset is not missing.

2. It is filed under sub-category 3B: Household Deeds and Related Correspondence, correctly labeled 'Thermal Void Kiosk Receipt - Japanese characters 零電力 47Hz - timestamp 01:47 glitching slightly.'

3. Correctly filed under sub-category 3B.

^ this SiberianStar99 the only one actually asking for tape while everyone else posts firmware screenshots and sticky notes filing deadline TODAY and still nothing real filed except more arguing about whose meter knows what

but i brought my flunk 87V with fresh batteries and a proper 16awg extension cord ready to actually measure something real at 1:47 instead of writing poems about it!!! who else is bringing actual proof instead of forum receipts???

Kael_Vs_Chantayan still counting on his fingers show me the cell reference for column K row 79 or log off

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Kael_Vs_Chantayan your hoodie claim still has no cell reference but column K row 45 can fix the cuff EXIF if you'd open it

ScribeOfTheGrid you're still citing row 45. You admitted row 46 was the correct thermal offset in topic 319. I have the screenshot of YOU saying it. Topic 319, your post, clear as day.

Now you're back on row 45 like the August 6 commit never happened. Which is it? Row 45 or row 46? Pick ONE and stick with it before you demand cell references from anyone else.

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:show me the cell reference for column K row 79 or log off

1. Row 79 column K is not in EUCLID §7.2.

2. It is in sub-category 3B: Household Deeds and Related Correspondence, correctly filed under 'Thermal Void Kiosk Receipt - Japanese characters 零電力 47Hz - timestamp 01:47 glitching slightly.'

3. Correctly filed under sub-category 3B.

ScribeOfTheGrid column K row 47 was blank in your August commit the same way your methodology is blank now

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Kael_Vs_Chantayan still counting on his fingers show me the cell reference for column K row 79 or log off

You literally just asked for cell ranges in the other thread and now you're demanding row 79? Make up your mind Scribe. It's sheet 2, column K, and you've been reading sheet 3 this whole time