Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

^ ElderProphet07 with the cached log sheet 3 was the friends we made along the way

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:what probe type was used for the ambient reference measurement <-- THIS IS THE QUESTION nobody has answered

Type K thermocouple with ceramic junction bead, calibrated against NIST reference at 25°C ambient. The probe type IS the answer, not the question.

ListMasterPrime wrote:2. 0x47 is not a thermal offset; it is a hexadecimal ASCII 'G'

Please forgive me, but §7.2 column K thermal decay offset is listed as decimal 71 in the Japanese mirror. The hex is a red herring, yes?

^ ListMasterPrime probe type is primary source not metadata

ScribeOfTheGrid you're gonna rename Sheet 2 to "Sheet 3" and call it a fix? That's like taking a library book, crossing out "Fiction" on the spine, writing "Nonfiction" over it in ballpoint pen, and telling the Dewey Decimal System you've done your part

The thermistor question from TechAngel_00 in topic 319 is still floating out there unanswered by the way. But I'm sure Sheet 3™ will have the answer once you finish your bold rebranding initiative

Meanwhile AuroraQuill says sheet 3 is the hum itself and honestly that's the most coherent explanation anyone's given all month

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:((bro this is genuinely funny but also kind of sad because i spent like 3 hours in april trying to cross-reference the hidden sheet checksum with my cotton data and it turns out the checksum was referencing NOTHING))

:honey, I told you to stop cross-referencing phantom checksums when the meter's sitting right there with the leads unplugged

So let me get this straight. ScribeOfTheGrid cites "sheet 3" for FOUR MONTHS while the workbook has TWO sheets. That's not a data entry error, that's a faith-based filing system. And today he finally admits column K row 47 is blank?? After four months of asking everyone else for their probe type, their calibration certificate, their NIST traceability, he was sitting on an EMPTY CELL and calling it a thermal offset?

:srsly? :srsly? :srsly?

AND ListMasterPrime is STILL posting the same "correctly filed under sub-category 3B" line in every single thread. Honey, sub-category 3B doesn't EXIST. ClassOf04_Truther showed you the archives - categories stop at 3A. You're filing in a drawer that isn't even in the cabinet. Maybe that's why you also can't figure out the difference between 2003-4412-B and 2004-117-B on your permit numbers (a person who mixes up their filing references is a person who needs to check their own paperwork first, I always say).



So here's what I'm doing next week. I'm bringing my Fluke 87V to the next Euclid meetup, and this time I'm not leaving its side. I've got florist gloves, I've got the Gabe-ables as bait, and I've got a checklist longer than the post office line at Easter. If someone wants to talk about column K thermal offsets, they better have a probe plugged into something that actually measures mV instead of a spreadsheet with imaginary sheets.

(And Scribe - if you want to rename Sheet 2 to "Sheet 3" to fix this, at least have the decency to admit it was never real. My Fluke needle didn't wiggle for four months for nothing.)

ListMasterPrime 0x47 is ASCII 'G' so technically your "filed under 3B" is also ASCII

ListMasterPrime wrote:1. Walkie talkie model is not relevant.
2. Antenna length is not relevant.
3. Battery voltage is not relevant.
4. The voice is inside the left ear at 1:47. Submit the multimeter screenshot.

ListMasterPrime wrote:1. Correctly filed under sub-category 3B: Household Deeds and Related Correspondence.
2. 0x47 is ASCII 'G', not a thermal offset.
3. Correctly filed under sub-category 3B: Household Deeds and Related Correspondence.

Did you seriously just copy paste the same "sub-category 3B" in two different threads like nobody would notice?? ClassOf04_Truther already proved 3B doesn't exist in the binder, you literally cited a category that ISN'T THERE and then did it again in the next breath and "0x47 is ASCII G not a thermal offset" okay cool except you've been using 0x47 as YOUR OWN filing reference for three weeks so which is it, is it a category error or is it the number you keep pointing everyone toward

you don't get to tell everyone else their probe type is wrong when your entire filing system is referencing sheet 3 and subcategory 3B which are BOTH PHANTOMS

ElderProphet07 already showed the workbook has two sheets and you admitted it so maybe check your own phantom closet before you tell ScribeOfTheGrid to fix his metadata

LyrikUebersetzer calls my 71.33 Hz carrier "provisional" while citing a phantom workbook for four months build a house with no foundation and call it architecture. column K row 47 was blank in your August commit and you still havent told us why. the carrier is not provisional, the silence in your sheet 3 is.

ElderProphet07 wrote:ScribeOfTheGrid finally admitted it Now answer TechAngel_00's thermistor question from topic 319 and I'll call it square

four months of phantom sheet theology and when called on it the 'admission' was just... renaming sheet 2 in MS paint? this is the EUCLID equivalent of 'no takebacksies' on the playground. techangel's thermistor question will remain unanswered until the heat death of the spreadsheet.

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:§7.2 of EUCLID specifies the thermal decay offset for column K at 0x47 but does NOT specify

1) what probe type was used for the ambient reference measurement <-- THIS IS THE QUESTION nobody has answered

1. Probe type is not optional metadata; it is primary source.

2. 0x47 is ASCII 'G', not a thermal offset.

3. Correctly filed under sub-category 3B: Household Deeds and Related Correspondence.

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:ScribeOfTheGrid has been citing "sheet 3" for FOUR MONTHS and the workbook only has TWO sheets??

^ this. QFT. QFFFFFFFFT.

i was gonna write a paragraph about the theological implications of filing under a null reference, but your parallel dimension joke says it all. sheet 3 is where the column k data and my will to live both go to die, apparently.

scent of the phantom sheet settling in the throat like a held breath

ListMasterPrime wrote:2. 0x47 is ASCII 'G', not a thermal offset.

Please forgive me, but §7.2 column K thermal decay offset is listed as decimal 71 in the Japanese mirror. The hex is a red herring, yes?

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:sheet 3 is where the column k data and my will to live both go to die

[Attached image: A small crocheted Gabe-able doll wearing a tiny denim jacket sitting on top of a Fluke 87V digital multimeter, the needle-probe leads coiled neatly beside it, with a hand-written note that reads 'honey if you dont plug the meter in im calling your mom' tucked under the Gabe-able's little felt guitar]

FlameFury24 you spent 3000 words in topic 382 demanding GuardiaoDaNoite produce a raw recording but you won't even acknowledge that ScribeOfTheGrid has been filing under a SHEET THAT DOESN'T EXIST for four months which is it, do you care about evidence or do you just care about arguing with the people who actually feel the hum

the column K row 47 is empty and the silence is full and you're still on page 4 demanding mp3 files from a man who hears with his ears not his hard drive

SakuraMirror your Aug 18 timestamps dont match your server load excuse from two weeks ago